Hawktawk wrote:As I said Genos actions at the station were DEPLORABLE. But the arrest and the probable cause were fairly routine . My point about a high horsepower vehicle driving 90 is explaining how easy it is to be doing 90 and not even realize it. It’s a toenail on the pedal in a Bentley with 6 or 700 horsepower.
Geno's arrest was anything but routine. It's not every DUI suspect that threatens the arresting officers, tells him that they have small dick syndrome, and needs to be physically restrained to take a court approved blood sample even with their employer's representative was present. But now that you explained your 90 mph comment, I'll give you a pass on that part of your story.
Hawktawk wrote:I can’t judge a man for a DUI because been there done that . It was the extra curricular stuff that really elevated it . I’ve never behaved like that with a law enforcement officer and I plead guilty against the advice of my attorney .
And who knows with his frame of mind he may have driven away from an accident scene . But again Sherman did in fact do so after 36 units of Jamison . Ruggs was 17 shots or the equivalent of .24 doing 156 which means Sherman should have been dead drinking twice as much . If he weren’t a famous athlete in the community with an admitted fan for a judge he would have done months in jail at a minimum . But when the judge says you’re a “pillar of the community “ or words to that effect you get off with a slap on the wrist . That’s trivializing a DUI. Geno won’t get that treatment .
I was and continue to be somewhat surprised Seattle is still interested in Geno and if I were him I’d take the offer . And get Uber on your phone .
Where did you see that Sherman had
"36 units of Jamison"? As far as I know, his BAC was never revealed. We don't know anymore about Sherman's BAC than we do Geno's, yet you continue to repeat unsubstantiated rumors about how much Sherman had to drink. Besides, had Sherman consumed as much as you claim, he would not have been able to physically function well enough to nearly tear down a door.
The prosecutor in Sherman's case said that the punishment he received was in line with comparable cases, and neither you nor I have any tangible reason to doubt him. They know what kind of public scrutiny they were under, how they'd be stepping into a hornet's nest if Sherman were treated any differently one way or another. Through the Freedom of Information Act, news reporters have been able to search court documents and expose the Good 'ol Boy network that you and me grew up with. The kind of things you're talking about just doesn't happen anymore.
The fact that you continue to characterize Geno's arrest as 'garden variety' or routine, along with your over dramatization of Sherman's incident by making unprovable statements and accusing the prosecution without any evidence of giving Sherman a favorable sentence, all in an attempt to make Geno's DUI seem tame in comparison, indicates to me that you are trivializing it.