mykc14 wrote:No question they will want to keep as many picks as they can. They also will want to get a high pick from trading Mayfield, but the reality is they have completely backed themselves into a corner on this one. They agreed to the stupidest contract in NFL history while giving up 3 1st, a 3rd, and a 4th round pick. Not only did they guarantee $80 million more than any other player in NFL history but they also put themselves in salary cap hell after this year just to make sure Deshaun loses as little money as possible due to suspensions this year. They have three players who will account for over 1/2 their total cap next season. They have completely burned every bridge with Mayfield- everybody knows they can't keep him around. They can't pay him $19 mil this year and everybody knows it. The other reality is that Mayfield on a one year rental isn't worth that much anyway. No leverage plus Mayfield's cap situation means that the reality is they are probably going to have to give up something to get rid of Mayfield. My guess is that they either have to part with their 3rd MINIMUM or create some sort of deal where they are paying part (probably around half) of Mayfield's contract. If they pay money they might get a late round pick for him.
NorthHawk wrote:I’m not sure we do have the Cap space.
Spotrac has us with 16M and his contract is 18M.
As well we still have to address the OT situation and sign draft picks.
obiken wrote:Barring injuries, I just think Mayfield is done as a starting QB in the NFL. Never the less, the NFL is ALL about injuries.
NorthHawk wrote:I’m sure it could be done, but it complicates things and in a rebuilding year it might not
be the best strategy.
Hawktawk wrote:I don’t see a rebuild . I see a reset . I’m optimistic .
NorthHawk wrote:I keep hearing what he said about Tarvaris Jackson in my head.
I think he was saying the same things.
obiken wrote:Pete is done, he has ZERO credibility left! Him and John scouting Josh Allen, is like the fat guy going to the strip club when he has a gorgeous modelesque wife sitting at home who loves him.
If that butthurt the little 35 million man F him.
It's impossible for me to take you seriously when you spout pure hateraid like that.
Aseahawkfan wrote:And you don't put your young players in a bad position to fail like Pete and Bevell did to our guys. You don't put guys in a position to fail like that.
Hawktawk also never likes to mention we wouldn't even be in a Super Bowl without Russell Wilson. He loves to overlook that.
Hawktalk wrote:If that butthurt the little 35 million man F him.
c_hawkbob wrote:It's impossible for me to take you seriously when you spout pure hateraid like that.
RiverDog wrote:If that butthurt the little 35 million man F him.
It's impossible for me to take you seriously when you spout pure hateraid like that.
Honestly, Hawktalk, it's getting to that point with me, too. Your attitude towards Russell has changed to such a degree that it's affecting your objectivity. You go through these unabashed love affairs with some players, highlighting their relatively modest achievements and make excuses for their failings, while trivializing the accomplishments of a player like Russell that had the misfortune of landing on your personal $hit list.
For example, in one recent thread, you were critical of the strip sack Russell gave up in the 2014 NFCCG against the Niners and Aldon Smith, that it was part of your ridiculous claim that we got to the Super Bowl in spite of Russell, while several months ago, an almost identical strip sack that Geno gave up in overtime against the Steelers wasn't his fault, rather you credited the efforts of DPOY candidate TJ Watt's phenomenal play while constantly pumping Geno up for his performance against the 3-14 Jacksonville Jaguars.
Hawktawk wrote:As for my remark about Josh Allen butt hurting Russ last I checked the Pack actually drafted a real bad QB in the first round and Rodgers still stayed loyal in the end . Might have been a bit hard on the wording but I don’t like it in any pro athlete . Russ lost a lot with me . You all want to fight for a guy that left and slung mud and lied go for it . Facts aren’t hate .
trents wrote:So, getting back to the thread subject, what about Mayfield?
RiverDog wrote:As for my remark about Josh Allen butt hurting Russ last I checked the Pack actually drafted a real bad QB in the first round and Rodgers still stayed loyal in the end .
Facts aren't hate, but four letter words damn sure are. A little hard on the wording is an understatement. It was a disrespectful, inflammatory way to make your point.
This is just my take so don't interpret it as me lecturing you or anyone else. Russell didn't "lose a lot with me" because I didn't have the admiration and worship of him that others had in him in the first place. So when he told us that he wanted to play for Seattle for another 10 years or whatever it was he said, I didn't believe him for a second.
Lying and dishonesty are standard operating procedure in that environment, in the fish bowl. If Russell doesn't say that he's going to play that long and answers with a 'no comment' or tries to brush them off, someone is going to write an article saying he is unhappy and the rumor mill starts churning out gossip, so he really had no choice. Same thing with Pete. Everyone has been asking those two the same question for the past 9 months. It was impossible for either of them to answer it honestly.
That doesn't mean that I don't have my criticism of Russell. I think he's a charlatan, tells who ever is in his presence whatever it is they want to hear, is obsessed with his public image. Like you, I, too, have grown tired of him and wasn't all that disappointed to see him go. But I'll never say "F-him". That type of response I reserve for the true jerks and a-holes.
Hawktawk wrote:Well when I describe what you just described in who Russ has become now and I just read where Obi blames some scout trip for Russell’s “camp” being upset I guess F him is just a natural reaction to that cherry on top for him . I never thought he was a god or a perfect person , just less phony by far then he was . As for scouting Allen etc it was clearly due diligence . Too bad he didn’t fall to them .
RiverDog wrote:The NFL owner's meeting will be held later this week, and there's speculation that there could be a deal reached during the meetings. The Seahawks are consistently mentioned as the top landing spot for Mayfield, but we haven't shown the slightest interest in him, although that could be just a smoke screen to drive down the price. But for sure, if we really wanted him, we would have made an offer by now.
The top 4 destinations that I've seen mentioned are Seahawks, Saints, Falcons, and Texans.
RiverDog wrote:The NFL owner's meeting will be held later this week, and there's speculation that there could be a deal reached during the meetings. The Seahawks are consistently mentioned as the top landing spot for Mayfield, but we haven't shown the slightest interest in him, although that could be just a smoke screen to drive down the price. But for sure, if we really wanted him, we would have made an offer by now.
The top 4 destinations that I've seen mentioned are Seahawks, Saints, Falcons, and Texans.
NorthHawk wrote:The teams without a clear starting QB will always be mentioned in articles. It's like the authors say hey, these teams need a starting QB, so I'll associate them with wanting Mayfield.
Whether or not we are really interested? Who knows at this point and I think the Saints just re-signed Winston so if I read that correctly they would be out of the running.
NorthHawk wrote:Jimmy G. had surgery on his throwing shoulder, so that complicates any trade for him at this time, so for now the field is down to Baker as a starting QB for those teams who want to be at least somewhat settled at QB before the draft.
Hawktawk wrote:I read that the Browns are in constant contact with Mayfields agent trying to work out something . He could be cut . I’ve heard a few rumors linking Garropolo to Seattle but again for that money ? Your paying him almost as much as Russ who is a far more dynamic QB. However Garrapalo has been to a Super Bowl and possibly a dropped int from 2 in the last 3 years while Russ hasn’t been past a WC in 8. Returning to Mayfield who is the first qb in Cleveland to win anything but had a dreadful down year after a nice year. . So you say well we’re getting a guy Wilson’s stature , not as athletic or accurate . Far more turnovers for 19 million. I don’t know what Lockes # is but my guess is far less for a cleaner sheet of paper and he’s a mobile 6’4” moose with a” hose “ arm . I was watching the first regular season game he played and thought at the time he looked pretty dynamic .
Geno can be had for probably 2 million and proved last year he’s far better than he was early in his career . He moved the chains , conducted a 98 yard drive vs the world champs cold , had an excellent final game . he’s 6’3.5, fairly mobile with a big accurate arm . Younger than Russ with 20% as much mileage . I could make a reasonable case for rolling with some combination of those guys , battle it out .
In other news the Thome family has cut ties with the browns over bringing in Watson . I’ll tell you it’s terrible Karma .
obiken wrote:River, trying to reach HT now is like trying to reach a Trump supporter. All we can do is wait and play out the charade, 10 wins, give me a break!
RiverDog wrote:River, trying to reach HT now is like trying to reach a Trump supporter. All we can do is wait and play out the charade, 10 wins, give me a break!
I'm not trying to 'reach' anyone. My object isn't to convert anyone to my POV, I'm just expressing my opinion. And I don't think it preposterous to feel that we could win 10 games next season, at least not at this point. After all, we have on paper what looks to be a very soft schedule. But, yes, our friend HT has suddenly joined the glass half full side of the forum, and that's perfectly fine with me. We don't all have to be Debbie Downers.
Hawktawk wrote:Not sure what you’re quip about getting me hopes up meant?
Hawktawk wrote:If JS wants to move on from Geno it’s his perogative . I trust him more than Russ. All I know is at the same press conference regarding Wilson officially being traded Pete specifically mentioned Geno , said he had “ total command “ of the offense and so was ahead of the competition in that regard . So if he isn’t signed to me it means they are planning on taking a QB or signing mayfield or something . It would also illustrate once again the power shift as PC has already insinuated he didn’t want to trade Wilson and that he had wanted to try to keep Wagner .
My optimism is not all of a sudden . It started growing in the last 6 games as we finally had a dominant run game to set up
Play action and give the defense a rest . We won 4 of 6, should have been 5 and could have been all of them with a little better QB play I attributed to injury . The last 2 games he was mostly great , Penney set NFL records . I was ready to run it back out with Russ and was somewhat surprised when it went down . But the more I learn about the utter dysfunction there had to be with coaches in that locker room coupled with a substandard year from the disgruntled guy I can imagine the paint on the walls of the V Mac turned a lighter shade . It had to be a 5000 lb gorilla for a couple years .
Razz all you want but I noticed in Genos starts how hard guys fought , postgame razzing on Twitter . DK “. Never had a ball like that “ Diggs “ you’re slower than at West Virginia and you suck at video games . “ a real affection. Something tells me the reaction would have been the same with any team first backup . It’s the first guy in 10 years not named Wilson . They rallied .
I think PC and JS and a lot of our guys coming back have a point they want to prove . Let’s see if they can .
NorthHawk wrote:If Geno was starting material he wouldn’t be waiting to be signed. There are too many teams
looking for a starting caliber QB or improvement to let him sit, so it would seem HT is out of
step with the coaches and gms of the NFL.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 59 guests