NorthHawk wrote:Good player, but we've got way too much invested in the Safety position.
RiverDog wrote:
This.
More evidence that Pete feels that we're not rebuilding, that we're reloading. Diggs might have played well enough to deserve this contract, but re-signing him isn't what's going to get us back to the Super Bowl.
mykc14 wrote:Shouldn't we keep a good player? He was the best player on our D last year. PC needs a Free Safety who can cover the whole field. He needed ET and he needs Diggs. If it comes down to it in two years we can cut Adams and keep Diggs. I understand not wanting to put too much money into one position, but letting a guy like Diggs walk doesn't make sense. He is getting like 13 mil/year which is probably a little underpaid for a pro-bowl safety. If we are re-building it is not crazy to think we could be competing in 3 years and Diggs would still be on the team. Plus we have $130 million in cap space next year. Personally I think that $13 mill is well spent.
Hawktawk wrote:so far it doesn't look like a rebuild signing the same defenders from last year. Woods and Sydney Jones are also signed. They are betting on Hurt
RiverDog wrote:
Then get rid of Adams. The two highest paid players on our defense are going to be safeties, and I don't think that's a formula for success.
Then get rid of Adams. The two highest paid players on our defense are going to be safeties, and I don't think that's a formula for success.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests