NorthHawk wrote:If Pete and the FO actually believe they are only a player or two away from a championship, then they can't wait until FA is over then
pick at the bargain bin hoping for a miracle. That hasn't worked for 8 years or more and all it has done is given the team some
questionable backups and FA failures.
If they do the same this year then we will know they don't really believe we are close and it's another sales job from Pete.
obiken wrote:
Yeah we are a long ways from 1 or 2 guys making us a playoff team, especially in our division.
obiken wrote:Yeah we are a long ways from 1 or 2 guys making us a playoff team, especially in our division.
Hawktawk wrote:I get the doom and gloom . But I’m not feeling it. I feel like after 2004 into 2005 I just felt it . That’s the year I met up with Whatsyourprob. I feel like I did after 2012 and the last second loss to Atlanta . The last few weeks of 21 I saw a balanced but explosive offense , a pass rush coming to life , a secondary demonstrating great depth and good talent . a QB back to playing like a pro bowl qb.
We swept the 9ers . Split with AZ whose coach is looking light in the loafers and the little midget is spinning out mentally and getting beat up physically . We gotta solve the Rams . Or more correctly Russ has to solve the Rams . They are his kryptonite . To solve them we need our offense to be what it was at seasons end and problem solved . That means the 2 most important FAs on offense are Penney and Phil Haynes. We need diggs back . We need Russ bought in and healthy . But it’s clear with all the new young blood on the staff they aren’t getting paid to just answer to Pete. His replacement might be on this staff now . I think Seattle will be players in FA outside their own roster and who knows in the draft . Not a draft guru but have heard deep in line talent.
I wouldn’t be shocked to see us win this division next year .
Hawktawk wrote:I get all that . But Cincy was a play from a Lombardi with the worst O line in the league . Rams were a dropped pick from possible defeat . In the NFC there is great parity . We can say we lost 5 of 9 or we can say we won 4 of our last 6 , should have definitely been 5 of 6 with the Bears fiasco . And our maligned defense held the Rams to 10 points for much of the game as Russ had a typical dreadful game vs them . Even then a no call on a pass interference or who knows about that one . We were 0-5 in games decided by 3 points or less and Russ should not have been playing in a couple , then had to heal . At seasons end we were playing as well as anyone in the conference . It will be interesting to see what happens in FA especially our guys and the draft but yeah , I’m feeling it . At my age maybe it’s gas but I feel something is brewing with this team . I feel way better then after Green Bay etc.
TriCitySam wrote:I'm more with Hawktawk on this, mainly because a) we have some real core talent, b) I think these last 2 draft classes are really developing and 3) we played even in our division, and nobody - not even the Rams - dominated. So, we have a real chance to compete for the top spot, benefited by strength of scheudule.
RiverDog wrote:About 3/4 of the league can 'compete for the top spot.' and can justifiably say that they have draft classes that are "really developing". The problem is that we haven't changed anything from what we've been doing over the course of the last 7 seasons, yet this season, we somehow expect the results to be different.
I'm not necessarily pessimistic, but I want to see something other than throwing a couple of assistant coaches into the volcano, a ritual that has become an annual event.
RiverDog wrote:About 3/4 of the league can 'compete for the top spot.' and can justifiably say that they have draft classes that are "really developing". The problem is that we haven't changed anything from what we've been doing over the course of the last 7 seasons, yet this season, we somehow expect the results to be different.
I'm not necessarily pessimistic, but I want to see something other than throwing a couple of assistant coaches into the volcano, a ritual that has become an annual event.
TriCitySam wrote:Sorry, I don't agree with that assessment at all. They're not standing pat. The coaching changes are very positive, much more dramatic than we've seen in 4 or 5 years....and since nothing as happened yet in FA or the draft, pretty impossible to say that nothing's changed there. The last two drafts will likely produce at lease 2 PB caliber players, and that is not average. But your partially right, about 1/2 the league can compete.....and if RW stays healthy, so can we.
RiverDog wrote: But Cincy was a play from a Lombardi with the worst O line in the league .
What Cincy did this season was pretty rare, if not unprecedented. How many times has a team won just 4 games in one season and came as close to winning it all as they did the following year? They were emblematic of the type of season it was, unpredictable and dynamic, with almost all of the playoff games, including the Super Bowl, going down to the last minute. Whether this past season was an anomaly or the start of a trend remains to be seen.
RiverDog wrote: But Cincy was a play from a Lombardi with the worst O line in the league .
What Cincy did this season was pretty rare, if not unprecedented. How many times has a team won just 4 games in one season and came as close to winning it all as they did the following year? They were emblematic of the type of season it was, unpredictable and dynamic, with almost all of the playoff games, including the Super Bowl, going down to the last minute. Whether this past season was an anomaly or the start of a trend remains to be seen.
Hawktawk wrote:Joe Burrow blew out his knee after 4 games last year . Earlier this season he had to adjust to coming back from injury . But they went to the super bowl because Burrow led the league in completion percentage , qbr , qbr on contested throws while throwing for 4700 yards and 34 TDs. That was the difference .
govandals wrote:I try to be optimistic this time of year. It's fun to go through possible scenarios of adding players through the draft/FA. However, Pete's track record lately has made me quite the pessimist.
All the media reports of Desai and Hurtt having some control of game planning and player acquisition is nothing but lip service right now. I wanna see results!
By my count, 8 of the 22 starters on this team are UFA's. All those FA dollars will go quickly. I don't see room for a big splash in FA, MAYBE if they cut Wagner. Add to that a looming extension for DK who is a UFA after 2022.
RiverDog wrote:
Boy, Hawktalk, once a player flicks your Bic, you never let go of him. Now "Joe Cool" has such a grip on you that you're grossly misstating facts relating to him.
First of all, Burrow didn't get hurt in Game 4 last season, he was hurt in Game 10:
Joe Burrow tore the anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament in his left knee in his 10th game last season
read://https_sports.yahoo.com/?url=http ... 25463.html
Big difference.
Secondly, the Bengals were 2-7-1 after their first 10 games, so Burrow hadn't learned how to walk on water yet. Plus at 2-4, they had a better results AFTER he went down than they did before, so his going down wasn't the difference in their 2020 season. And lastly, Burrow finished 2020 ranked 24th in both passer rating and QBR, 22nd in completion percentage, so he definitely hadn't attained the deity status that you've adorned him with over the past few weeks.
Burrow had a great season and is a fine quarterback and may eventually take his place with the other great, young QB's around the league like Mahomes, Jackson, Allen, Hebert, Mac Jones, et al, but he's not MVP quality yet and won't be until he learns how to deal with a pass rush and/or the Bengals figure out how to do a better job of protecting him. He took a league high 51 sacks last season, and that's not counting the playoffs where he took 19.
Hawktawk wrote:""My bad on last year I got # of wins confused with the injury. Shouldn't be spitting stuff on here off the top of my head after a martiniIm not backing off any assessment I've made about the play of any player good or bad.Nor changing my flamboyant writing style . No matter how much it apparently bugs you. Its what it is."
Hawktawk wrote:"I would have to see the stats for last year to see what kind of player he was then.I know they play the browns Ravens and Steelers 2 times a season.Also joining a 1 win team with a 30 something year old second year coach.
Hawktawk wrote:But thats not now. The league leading categories are what they are. Jamaar Chase was a huge add and they have the potential to be one of those all time QB receiver combinations. He went off for 280 of Burrows 525 4 TD no pick strafing NFL record over Baltimore and then another 446 and 4 touches vs KC to get the division."That set another record of back to back games with 400 yards plus and 4 TDs.
" The line is one of the worst in pass blocking in the league. You say hes got to stop taking sacks I think hes got to be protected and using the KC game as an example he was only sacked once but took a pounding and saved the game with 3 long scrambles on 3rd downs, high stepping out of a tackle on one which saved the game as his line was shot. Taking 9 sacks vs the #1 seed and Vrabel dialing up every thing in the book. Threw a perfect dime to win it."
"In the super bowl he was sacked 7 times and hit and hurried many more in the game including the last play. But he and Chase hung up 160 on Ramsey(most hes ever given up) and had them beat for the game winner with Ramsay falling on his face when the real MVP made a play. As it was Burrow got the ball to the outlet who dropped it."
" After that game PFF gave his line the worst grade of any line in the league in any game in the entire season. As it was ,still 1 play away from it all. We cant have it both ways. there is a difference between taking a sack and getting sacked. Ask Russ hes gotten sacked and taken more sacks than anyone the last 10 seasons. Is he an OK QB?Why does Burrow take sacks and Russ just needs a better line?
Time will tell. My guess there might be 6 or 7 GMs in the league that wouldn't trade their guy for him right now, maybe less.
You underestimate the guys play, its record breaking potential. And unlike a certain Rb with similar potential he has a pretty solid body of work.
Hawktawk wrote:Burrow can’t get hit like that . But if I had to describe him I’d say he’s a blend of Brady and Manning in terms of arm talent , leadership and charisma . Physique wise as well , very similar . A bit more nimble but not enough for that line . I think if they keep him standing up he will have a hell of a career . If they don’t he can’t sustain it forever . My guess that team will be a huge player in the O line market . It’s set up well for them next year . Steelers need a QB. Lamar Jackson is breaking down in Baltimore and they crushed them last year anyway . Then the Browns with all their questions . I could see Cincy having a run in division next few years .
Hawktawk wrote:I don’t recall being particularly enamored with Manziel but I’ll go to my grave believing Tebow could start and win in the nfl. He got blackballed for his faith , his kneeling to praise god instead of trash cops , his rabid posse demanding he start . He had too many chefs trying to fix his arm motion which really hurt .but he won a division and a home playoff game in his only starting year taking over an 0-5 team . Tebow got hosed .
Elway brought in Manning who got beat at home his first year and got crushed by the Lob his second . In 2015 they won a super bowl with him going 1-14 on 3rd down with his noodle post HGH scandal arm .
Since then? It’s been the curse of Tebow .
Elway despised Tebow , was jealous of his adulation in Denver . He traded him to a team with another coach the toe sucking perv Ryan who hated the clean cut Tebow . He refused to give him a start. Tebow got Kapped, in a far different way . It’s a mistake that was made when you look at the league to say he was not one of the 30 best players at the position . No more so than by John Elway who couldn’t set his ego aside .
Burrows is already considered one of the top 10 or better QBs in the league by the experts . He’s generally ranked ahead of Russ .he outplayed Mahomes twice in a month . As I say his numbers including record performances tell me barring injury he’s not going to have much trouble adjusting to anyone . Like I say he hung well over 200 passing yards targeting arguably the best corner in the game . Had him beat again if not for Donald . I stand by my analysis of his potential. you will never hear this kid whine about getting hit or be complacent . He led the league in every meaningful statistic with no line coming off a horrific injury you pointed out was fairly late in his first season . Barring injury he’s gonna be really really good for a while .
Hawktawk wrote:Was Elway in charge when Tebow was drafted ? Not sure about that . Even so Tebows last year there when he won the division and outplayed Big Ben in the playoff win in Denver every big play he made Elway would frown , say negative stuff after wins . If you look at Elways and Tebows stats early in their career in Denver it’s eerily similar other than Tebow had success his first year.
Hawktawk wrote:The trade to the jets was the end for Tebow . The Jets owner wanted him to clean up the image of the team . Rex Ryan’s mini scandal being identified as a man sharing videos of him sucking his wife’s toes and speaking suggestively to the internet was one of the distractions at the time. Ryan didn’t want him. Ryan refused to play Tebow at all despite a lackluster roster . I don’t believe he started him a single time but was just given a trick play here and there which normally failed since everyone knew it was coming when he was sent in.
NorthHawk wrote:The problem with Tebow was he was not a good thrower of the ball and in his time at QB didn't make good decisions on a regular basis.
He would be great in a Veer Offense, but the NFL values its QBs and pays them too much to get them beat up early in the year.
Hawktawk wrote:How the hell do we go from draft and FA to Tebow ? Because I always take the bait.
Hawktawk wrote:Tebow was not beating out Brady . Looking at Chip Kelly’s record at Philly not a lot of his decision making proves anything . He won in Denver . Won a playoff game . He worked on his stroke which was great in college but too slow for the pros in the opinion of pro coaches . The meddling put his arm in no mans land . He completed something like 70% in college.
Hawktawk wrote:Go back and compare his one year starting in Denver with Elways rookie year that included lining up behind a guard .Elway wasn’t super accurate and made many big plays running around and launching with a powerful arm after the defense broke down . I saw it many times unfortunately . Similar games .
The Broncos were Tebow home . He was adored by the fans .He was a first round pick coming off a 9-4 season and a playoff win and the responsible thing would have been to develop him .
Elway screwed him .
Hawktawk wrote: For his career he (Tebow) completed 56% of his passes and his qbr is in the 70s , 90 something all time qbr. But he still win a lot and threw 300 TDs . Why ? Because he was a big athletic guy with a cannon arm who ran around and beat people as we both saw.
Hawktawk wrote:My point is had he stayed in Denver with a GM that liked him he would have only gotten better . He’s a positive minded never say die winner , much like a young Russ . He is an excellent analyst who would have improved at reading the field etc .
Aseahawkfan wrote:Tebow did seem like a good guy. But he was a freak show athlete whose game only did well in college when his athletic prowess at QB was far ahead of the people he faced. Freak show athleticism doesn't get you much at the NFL level where everyone is a freak show athlete. You're just another guy at that point if you can't quickly process the field and make plays against complex NFL defenses who are taking away everything you want to do while the fastest, largest freak show athlete pass rushers are barreling down on you looking to put you on your ass as painfully as the rules allow.
c_hawkbob wrote:If he'd (Tebow) have been willing to try TE earlier in his career we may be talking about him as a perennial pro bowler, but that willingness came way too late.
c_hawkbob wrote:Tebow wasn't a freakshow athlete, he was a strong, smart kid with a reasonable arm and good speed and a decent head on his shoulders. What separated him from the pack in college (making him one of the greatest college players ever) was his heart and his will to win. Those attributes stood him well in the pros but were not enough to separate him amongst other pros as was the case in college. If he'd have been willing to try TE earlier in his career we may be talking about him as a perennial pro bowler, but that willingness came way too late.
I have a friend that grew up with Tebow (played with him in HS and college) and also played Div 1 baseball with Russ. I asked him straight up who the better athlete was and he said their is no comparison, Wilson by far. He said Tebow was a tank, stronger than you and more determined than you but Russ was a Ferrari, lightning fast, agile and could do anything he wanted athletically. Russel Wilson is the freakshow athlete.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests