Hawktawk wrote:Retires . What is his legacy ? Well there’s the sex allegations for sure . A gift Super Bowl with surely one of the worst winning performances ever . But then another. Then a loss . Lots of wins and records . One of the hardest men to get on the ground ever . He held out on every play trying to make something happen . Tough as nails . Nice deep ball . Obviously HOF but I’d like to see him wait a few years due to the serious off field conduct .
I've never thought of Worthlessburger as HOF material as he's never been considered the best at his position, which in my book is, or rather should be, a prerequisite, but he's likely in based on his longevity and two rings.
On the moral issue of him having to wait a couple years and not be a first ballot, I agree. They made Terrell Owens wait simply because they didn't like his antics and he was never accused of committing a crime.
obiken wrote:
On the moral issue of him having to wait a couple years and not be a first ballot, I agree. They made Terrell Owens wait simply because they didn't like his antics and he was never accused of committing a crime.
obiken wrote:Come on Rivy, I was never a big fan of Rapestberber either, but he is a first ballot HOFamer. 6X Prowbowler, 3 SB's, and 2 Championships. He was also NFL Rookie of the year in 2004. Besides in 5 years no ones going to remember how he hung on too long the last 5 years of his career.
It's my own pet peeve. We've lowered the bar for HOF inductees in general, quarterbacks especially. I feel that a player should be thought of as at the top of his profession at least once in his career in order to be considered amongst the greatest to have played the game. Worthlessburger has Brady, Manning, Brees, and Rodgers as peers that played in his era and all of whom were lots better.
I understand that there have been players as marginal or worse than Big Ben, including Kenny Stabler and, more recently, Drew Pearson, that got gold jackets, but it still irritates me. It's like grade inflation in schools and colleges.
RiverDog wrote:It's my own pet peeve. We've lowered the bar for HOF inductees in general, quarterbacks especially. I feel that a player should be thought of as at the top of his profession at least once in his career in order to be considered amongst the greatest to have played the game. Worthlessburger has Brady, Manning, Brees, and Rodgers as peers that played in his era and all of whom were lots better.
I understand that there have been players as marginal or worse than Big Ben, including Kenny Stabler and, more recently, Drew Pearson, that got gold jackets, but it still irritates me. It's like grade inflation in schools and colleges.
Hawktawk wrote:I don’t see how there’s any argument about BB as a first ballot ball of fame qb. There’s some not considered worthy by many for whatever reason . Why shouldn’t Bradshaw be in with 4 titles in 6 years or something ? . And in an era where receivers and quarterbacks were fair game . I saw video of a defensive lineman picking up Bradshaw and pile driving his head into the turf with no flag . He was flopping around in convulsions afterwards .
Aikman won 3 . When you have Emmett Smith and you use him like you should your personal stats aren’t going to be too impressive . But 3 Lombardis don’t lie . He was a great field general , a fiery leader .
I look at guys like Rodgers and Brees and say where’s the beef? Where’s the hardware ? One championship over a decade ago for each , never even got back one time .
Marino was first ballot . He got to one SB in His career and got smoked by Joe Montana. He never got back , never had a 1000 yard rusher his entire career because he never made any pretense of trying to establish the run . That was with one of the greatest coaches of all time .
If HOF is about who has the sweetest stroke on the ball some of these guys don’t belong . If it’s about winning they all do .
yoder wrote:If any of you are a fan of The Onion, this is "pure gold".
http://www.theonion.com/pittsburgh-honors-ben-roethlisberger-with-commemorative-1848433164
yoder wrote:If any of you are a fan of The Onion, this is "pure gold".
http://www.theonion.com/pittsburgh-honors-ben-roethlisberger-with-commemorative-1848433164
yoder wrote:If any of you are a fan of The Onion, this is "pure gold".
http://www.theonion.com/pittsburgh-honors-ben-roethlisberger-with-commemorative-1848433164
yoder wrote:If any of you are a fan of The Onion, this is "pure gold".
http://www.theonion.com/pittsburgh-honors-ben-roethlisberger-with-commemorative-1848433164
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests