Hawktawk wrote:You hate the guy (Brady) I get it . He can be a complete ass. I find him far more acceptable then Rodgers.
Stream Hawk wrote:There may be an asterisk or two, but he’s the GOAT of qbs.
mykc14 wrote:Maybe this deserves it's own thread but when was the last time a QB won a SB when they were taking up anywhere near the cap percentage that RW is??
RiverDog wrote:Peyton Manning, Broncos in Super Bowl 50. Manning was making $19.2M a season and the salary cap in 2015 was $143M, or about 13-14% of the cap.
RiverDog wrote:Peyton Manning, Broncos in Super Bowl 50. Manning was making $19.2M a season and the salary cap in 2015 was $143M, or about 13-14% of the cap.
mykc14 wrote:But his cap hit in 2015 was only 17.5 mil which was 11% of the cap that year. I'm not looking at the average of the QB's over the course of their contract, but the percent of total cap they take up in the year they win.
NorthHawk wrote:Brady didn't win it last year, his Defense did along with the KC OL being decimated.
I will say this about him, he is the Greatest Opportunist of All Time as he's been along for the ride in many years and has been worthy of winning some Super Bowls.\
But to say the greatest QB of all time is a very high bar that cannot be proven. It can be shown to be suspect though as you would think the best ever would hold many
if not most of the QB records. He holds very few if any, and others who played less and had fewer chances of going deep into the playoffs hold more.
Hawktawk wrote:He might leave after this game . He’s getting knocked around pretty good . Rams are going to the super bowl by my eyes . 9ers aren’t beating them .
obiken wrote:I have always said teams win Championships. NE was the model of the Salary cap era. Is he a winner yes, he was willing to take Pay-cuts. Better as a single entity than Elway, no. As a Hawks fan who did I fear more, Elway or Brady? Elway by far. Moreover the game changed, QB's are way more important than they used to be. You cannot win on just a running game and defense anymore, Hostetler, Simms, and Rypen, all won SB's, that cannot happen anymore.
RiverDog wrote:Just a couple years ago, Nick Foles won a SB by starting out the season as a backup, so it's not like you can't win without a Pro Bowl QB.
Hawktawk wrote:Nick Foles beat our 35 million guy . But you are correct . Guys like Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson won Superbowls . But those type of guys don’t win 7. If this was his swan song Brady was valiant and lucky in the Brady way to even be in it . But the TD pass to Evans traveled 55 yards in the air and he threw for 217 in the second half after a brutal first half at almost 45 years old . I think he should retire now . He’s got nothing to prove to anyone anymore .
c_hawkbob wrote:Did you seriously just attempt to put Tom Brady in the same category as Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson?
RiverDog wrote:Yeah, sort of. At least at one point in his career.
Brady never did squat in college and was a 6th round draft pick. If he had more talent, like an Elway or Manning did, he would have shown it much earlier. He was an athlete that made the absolute most out of his God given gifts and was at the right place at the right time. If I had to pick a baseball player to compare him to, I'd select Pete Rose.
RiverDog wrote:Did you seriously just attempt to put Tom Brady in the same category as Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson?
Yeah, sort of. At least at one point in his career.
Brady never did squat in college and was a 6th round draft pick. If he had more talent, like an Elway or Manning did, he would have shown it much earlier. He was an athlete that made the absolute most out of his God given gifts and was at the right place at the right time. If I had to pick a baseball player to compare him to, I'd select Pete Rose.
Old but Slow wrote:Brady is the most accomplished QB. But GOAT? How can that even be approached? The game has changed too much to make such a judgement. The football itself has changed, as it was once rounder and more difficult to throw. Roughing the passer wasn't really a thing, and receivers could take their lives in their hands to run across the middle because blind-side and clothesline tackles were just part of the game. The game was more run centered with formations like T-formation and single wing. Splitting. receivers out wide was an innovation--remember the lonesome end?
Players like Johnny Unitas changed the game by refining the passing game, and he was the Brady of his day. He wasn't mobile enough to be great in the modern game, but he was a master of that era. Sammy Baugh, Norm Van Brocklin, Y A Tittle all played a different game.
Give Brady credit, marvel at Wilson, Mahomes, and the yoyo at GB, appreciate the greatness and the beauty, but forget ranking them over eras. It is difficult enough to compare quality within a single season, much less the quality over different eras.
GOAT? Why?
Old but Slow wrote:Brady is the most accomplished QB. But GOAT? How can that even be approached? The game has changed too much to make such a judgement. The football itself has changed, as it was once rounder and more difficult to throw. Roughing the passer wasn't really a thing, and receivers could take their lives in their hands to run across the middle because blind-side and clothesline tackles were just part of the game. The game was more run centered with formations like T-formation and single wing. Splitting. receivers out wide was an innovation--remember the lonesome end?
Players like Johnny Unitas changed the game by refining the passing game, and he was the Brady of his day. He wasn't mobile enough to be great in the modern game, but he was a master of that era. Sammy Baugh, Norm Van Brocklin, Y A Tittle all played a different game.
Give Brady credit, marvel at Wilson, Mahomes, and the yoyo at GB, appreciate the greatness and the beauty, but forget ranking them over eras. It is difficult enough to compare quality within a single season, much less the quality over different eras.
GOAT? Why?
Hawktawk wrote:If it’s about winning it’s not close...Just win baby .
RiverDog wrote:Mickey Mantle has more World Series home runs, 18, than any other player in the history of baseball. Yogi Berra has won 10 World Series rings, more than any other player. If it's all about winning, it's not close.
But no one is going to argue that Mantle or Berra are the GOAT of baseball because it isn't all about playing on a winning team.
RiverDog wrote:Mickey Mantle has more World Series home runs, 18, than any other player in the history of baseball. Yogi Berra has won 10 World Series rings, more than any other player. If it's all about winning, it's not close.
But no one is going to argue that Mantle or Berra are the GOAT of baseball because it isn't all about playing on a winning team.
Aseahawkfan wrote:That's not even comparable. Yogi and Mantle played on the same team with the same core players for their entire run.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I still cannot believe you rated him with Brady Smith and Trent Dilfer. That's one these most ridiculous ideas I've ever seen you post and you couldn't prove that rubbish no matter how hard you tried.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Well, at least things aren't decided by people talking on a forum. Brady is the GOAT QB because his stats and rings say he is, not the opinion of people on a forum. He will be acknowledged as such football historians and the NFL until someone matches or exceeds what he did.
Old but Slow wrote:If forced to choose a GOAT, I might say Brady, but I simply do not think that choosing one makes sense. What automobile is the GOAT? Which actor? The best burrito? Step right up and make your opinion known, and I'll just shake my head indulgently.
Hawktawk wrote:In football we have the math. It’s undeniable unless your criteria is who throws the sweetest football . That’s an unwinnable argument . But Jesus H 14 divisional wins in 20 years . Russ has 2 in 10. Go on down the line all the one and done QBs . It’ laughable to say Rodgers is better or anyone else really at being a field general leading your team to wins . In football the most important person on most every team is the QB. Brady win Suosrbowls with guys who were 5 years old when he won his first .
Winning is obviously a very big factor in evaluating a football player's performance, and as you say, even more so for a QB as he's the most influential player on the field, especially in this day and age. But it is far from the only metric.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests