Hawktawk wrote:I heard a saying once . Better check how big your parachute is before you jump out of the plane . Whose really out there that’s sure fire better ? But it clearly goes for a qb like Russel too. Who is going to be an upgrade ?
The decision may have come down to the final weeks and the teams improved play . Had they lost out after the bears game It may have been a different conversation.
So doesn’t this mean they clearly side with PC ? I think Russell’s future is very much in play . It was 18 months ago they erupted in a coaches meeting to ask for more input on game planning . Unless it’s all patched over I can’t see how Russel wants 2 more years of it .
RiverDog wrote: We'd probably end up with a place card holder for a year or two.
RiverDog wrote: We'd probably end up with a place card holder for a year or two.
tarlhawk wrote:Now who is the optomist? By not having a QB as a first round pick...let alone a second round selection...will "lightening strike twice"? ...allowing us to "discover" a generational QB like RW (3rd RD pick)...or Tom Brady (6th rd pick)? You have 20+ teams competing for such "treasure" in this current NFL climate. Without an above average QB...let alone an elite QB...your drafted play makers on both sides of the Off/Def sides would have no incentive to seek a contract beyond their rookie contract.
RiverDog wrote:I'm not exactly sure what is optimistic or pessimistic about my comment. I'm simply stating a fact as I've always seen it. If we trade Russell, then we're in for a major rebuild.
Hawktawk wrote: We went to 49 and some could debate 48 in spite of Russ but because our defense was lock down . If we have something in the middle qbs wise and run the ball and play defense we can win a lot of games without Russ not to mention he was 6-8 as a starter this year. Is he going to start improving at 34 .
RiverDog wrote:I'm not exactly sure what is optimistic or pessimistic about my comment. I'm simply stating a fact as I've always seen it. If we trade Russell, then we're in for a major rebuild.
tarlhawk wrote:I implied optimism because you said we'd only have a couple years of having a QB "place card holder". Here's the current projected FA QB beginning in 2022.
Tyrod Taylor QB 33
Jameis Winston QB 28
Cam Newton QB 33
Jacoby Brissett QB 30
NorthHawk wrote:What's better a good HC or a good QB?
tarlhawk wrote:The simple answer is why choose...both are desired and both are currently our team's blessing.
RiverDog wrote:
Tyrod Taylor QB 33
Jameis Winston QB 28
Cam Newton QB 33
Jacoby Brissett QB 30
If we were to trade Russell, we'd end up with a lot of capital for him. It wouldn't necessarily have to mean the end of the world.
RiverDog wrote:So if Russell does come out and demand a trade, if you were Pete, how would you respond? "Screw you, Russell! Get with the program! If you don't like it, tough chit, I'm the coach and you're the player!" Or something to that effect?
Hawktawk wrote:Brock and Salk were discussing a report regarding GMs around the league and their perception of Wilson . I don’t recall the reporters name but it was a big one . He said clubs aren’t as high on Wilson as he or JS thinks they are .
Again maybe just a waste of ink but I speculated on it earlier in the year when he was playing dreadful. If he doesn’t move it might be because nobody’s giving a kings ransom for a guy with some baggage and some question marks .or perhaps they are trying to suppress the market . We shall see.
tarlhawk wrote:” Is he going to start improving at 34 .”?
He doesn't need to start "improving" ...he showed in our promising season ending that whatever was "keeping him down...confidence/injury" he got over it and played like a winner again. The QB type you mention as middle QB wise is often referred to as a "game manager" which Russell quickly shrugged aside that label as he soon set passing/winning records for the start of a career. If stuck with a "game manager" you need a sustained stellar defense and even then your chance of winning close games becomes far from automatic.
Finding a lasting winning coach in this era isn't as easy as some suppose. A winning head coach is not only appreciated by a team's fan base...but trusted by team ownership. Many unwanted headaches for upper management can be the result of a bad choice of coach.
Hawktawk wrote:Unless I missed something Russ spotted AZ 14 points in a 38 -30 win . That means our defense gave up 16 points and the back went for 190 .
Russ was way better once Penney got rolling but still figured out how to lose to the bears with Penny going off for 135 and changing field position all night with chunk runs . Lots of people worry about whether Penney’s resurgence is real . We could ask the same of Russ . He’s making 35 million to be a clutch difference maker . Tell me his last clutch RW signature walk off win ? There were half a dozen chances late in games this year . Is his league worst 3rd down completion % an abberation or is this who he is now ? These are big questions . Anyone completing less than 50% on 3rd down needs to improve I don’t care who they are .
Hawktawk wrote:It’s kind of important to be right about the next few years of this guys career . If he declines we have 35 million in a declining QB who isn’t worth as much in trade as has been reported by some GMs already . Even if he’s as good as new nobody thinks he wants an extension . If he’s good and I think Penney as the feature back I don’t care beyond the next couple years . If he goes out and can’t move the chains like much of the last season and a half it does not matter who is coaching D.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests