c_hawkbob wrote:Penny ain't gonna take a prove it deal, he's an unrestricted FA, someone's gonna be willing to pay him.
RiverDog wrote:Cbob is exactly right. There is no extending Penny. We opted out of that option when we declined to pick up his 5th year option. He is an unrestricted free agent and is going to command top dollar. Despite his injury problems, Penny not only had a very impressive last 6 weeks, he's a former first round pick. Someone is going to pay him, and it won't be a "prove it" contract. He's going to get a multiyear deal in the neighborhood of $10M a season.
Running backs have the shortest careers of any other position on the field. It simply does not make sense to pay a high risk player that kind of money when we already have one under contract and have so many other mouths to feed.
Hawktawk wrote:Someone is going to sign him. Why not us? besides it seems a month ago almost nobody thought he would be worth a damn or draw any interest![]()
There isn't another back quite like him right now.ELITE
tarlhawk wrote:I think the use of a Franchise Tag is the only way an Unrestricted free agent (irregardless of how he became a UFA) can be kept by a team willing to offer a pay jump without getting into a bidding war. The Non-Exclusive FT would force a team to surrender two first Rd Picks to take him off our hands.
mRiverDog wrote:
We've gone over the reasons why not for weeks, so there's no sense kicking a dead horse. I get it, you have a Geno like infatuation with him.
There are quite a few running backs out there that don't have the injury history that Penny has, including Melvin Gordon and Sony Michel, that are going to cost about the same as will Penny, but I don't see us going after any of them:
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/contracts/s ... limit-100/
BTW, this site has Penny valued at $10.7M, about what I expect him to sign for.
There are other FA running backs out there that don't have the injury history that Penny has:
tarlhawk wrote:I think the use of a Franchise Tag is the only way an Unrestricted free agent (irregardless of how he became a UFA) can be kept by a team willing to offer a pay jump without getting into a bidding war. The Non-Exclusive FT would force a team to surrender two first Rd Picks to take him off our hands.
RiverDog wrote:Cbob is exactly right. There is no extending Penny. We opted out of that option when we declined to pick up his 5th year option. He is an unrestricted free agent and is going to command top dollar. Despite his injury problems, Penny not only had a very impressive last 6 weeks, he's a former first round pick. Someone is going to pay him, and it won't be a "prove it" contract. He's going to get a multiyear deal in the neighborhood of $10M a season.
Running backs have the shortest careers of any other position on the field. It simply does not make sense to pay a high risk player that kind of money when we already have one under contract and have so many other mouths to feed.
RiverDog wrote:Cbob is exactly right. There is no extending Penny. We opted out of that option when we declined to pick up his 5th year option. He is an unrestricted free agent and is going to command top dollar. Despite his injury problems, Penny not only had a very impressive last 6 weeks, he's a former first round pick. Someone is going to pay him, and it won't be a "prove it" contract. He's going to get a multiyear deal in the neighborhood of $10M a season.
Running backs have the shortest careers of any other position on the field. It simply does not make sense to pay a high risk player that kind of money when we already have one under contract and have so many other mouths to feed.
TriCitySam wrote:It will be interesting to see what kind of offers he gets. I had heard last week in the media they thought it would be $3-4MM. I kinda find both ($10MM and $3MM) surprising numbers, but if it's on the low end I would expect us to take a shot. His production has always been good on a YPC side, and in '21 nobody's close (Chubb is 5.5, Penney is 6.3 - Carson is 4.3). Too bad he couldn't stay on the field these past couple years.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Penny isn't going to command top dollar. I don't think anyone is going to be that stupid. But he might get an offer that at least puts us out of the running. Top dollar is 12 to 15 million a year and I doubt anyone is shelling that out. It doesn't have to be top dollar to beat us. No intelligent GM is going to give him some long-term deal based on 4 games at the end of a contract year. NFL GMs know RB is one of the toughest positions in the NFL and you don't spend much money on them because they don't last long. The highest paid RB in the NFL is making 15 million a a year, which is on the low end of contract money for a position. They are making that low money because the NFL shelf life of a RB is pretty low.
Penny's last four games may have some excited some GM to spend more than others on him. But most smart GMs are going to look over his entire body of work and go from there. That likely means some kind of 2 or 3 year deal with prove it incentives. This idea Penny has tons of leverage is pretty ridiculous. He doesn't. The best RBs in the NFL are already getting paid and already set. Penny is a guy who flashed at the end of a contract year. That is more often than not fool's gold for the person who overspends at the RB position. You don't want to lock up that much money and a contract into a position is that has a short shelf-life.
The euphoria of the past weeks will wear off pretty quickly as negotiations start.
TriCitySam wrote:It will be interesting to see what kind of offers he gets. I had heard last week in the media they thought it would be $3-4MM. I kinda find both ($10MM and $3MM) surprising numbers, but if it's on the low end I would expect us to take a shot. His production has always been good on a YPC side, and in '21 nobody's close (Chubb is 5.5, Penney is 6.3 - Carson is 4.3). Too bad he couldn't stay on the field these past couple years.
RiverDog wrote:If Penny were to come in somewhat less than $5M, it might not be a bad gamble. But there's only one team, the Browns, with two RB's making over $5M per season, and you have to think that there's a reason why more teams don't pay for depth at that position.
Stream Hawk wrote:I agree that Penny does not have plenty of leverage. But not the argument that he suddenly showed up in the last few weeks being fool's gold. If it was true fool's gold, then where the hell was in first 3/4 of the season? If Penny (or anyone) had a magic button to turn on, then sign me up for that!
In my opinion, Penny produced because something finally clicked. AP perhaps had something to do with that. And the luck of not getting hurt after every play. He has always had that extra gear, and it finally clicked with the blocking scheme here.
I could be wrong, but think the Hawks will bring him back. He was drafted here, and I bet they have some pride to keep their own.
RiverDog wrote:If Penny were to come in somewhat less than $5M, it might not be a bad gamble. But there's only one team, the Browns, with two RB's making over $5M per season, and you have to think that there's a reason why more teams don't pay for depth at that position.
tarlhawk wrote:Because RB is no longer an offensive feature when NFL rules have been altered to benefit 3 and 4 WR sets. A respected WR can cut off a route and pickup more yards than your avg RB can on a rush...your special RB's who can create Explosive plays (20+ yds) are able to earn a place...but they are fewer and fewer which is why a play making WR can command way richer contracts than your typical RB. The nice thing about the O-Line is that most College Football O-Line can still Run Block well but Pass Pro ready O-Linemen are fewer and harder to find.
And that's what a GM has to figure out. Did something click or does he come back after getting signed next year, get hurt early, and go back to what he was the previous 3 and a half years.
In the first 3/4 of the season, people thought this guy is doing nothing and he's gone after this year. Four or five games later, now a certain segment of the fan base is just sure Penny's 3 and a half years prior was the false Penny and this four games is the new Penny.
That's what a GM has to figure out. What do I risk on that and for what price?
I think the good teams like the Baltimore's, New England's, Pittsburgh's, and Green Bay's, the perennial contenders won't spend unreasonable money to find out. They contend every year because they're good at drafting and developing and don't spend much money in free agency or for stupid trades and contracts like the Jamal Adams trade and conrtract.
But some team wanting to make a splash may overspend on Penny and maybe they'll be right. But I would not make that bet for a high price if I'm the Seahawks GM. I would be running my team like a perennial contender always knowing my drafting and development is good enough to win at any point in time without having to make stupid trades or take on stupid contracts.
Stream Hawk wrote:It's not just a segment of the fanbase. Don't forget about former players and "the media".
If we (sorry, I consider the Hawks as "we") are staying the course, then Penny is a CRITICAL component to our success as a true contender. Penny has generational/blue-chip talent. True SuperBowl contenders have such players. Carson is great, but not blue-chip great. I can imagine Schneider knows this and will do his best to lure Penny back. As far as other contenders, the Packers resign their key players, such as Aaron Jones. I realize AJ had a huge track record compared to Penny, but sometimes a good GM has to take risks.
Hawktawk wrote:Some of us were on his jock the day they picked him. Plenty were paying attention when he started going off in 2019 . My question was whether he would recover from the injury and if so would he still have the elite burst and top speed . We see the answer now and everyone in the league thinks it’s enough of a sample size now . Yes Stream he is a generational talent. If we want more of what we got out of our offense including Russ the last few weeks we need THIS back.
Aseahawkfan wrote:We have some football historians on this forum. How many RBs have turned it around in year 4? We have any quality examples of this occurring?
I can think of a few QBs who came into serviceable or better later in their careers like Rich Gannon and the ultimate in Kurt Warner. What about RBs? How many RBs that did next to nothing for four years, then blew up after year 4?
Stream Hawk wrote:It's not just a segment of the fanbase. Don't forget about former players and "the media".
If we (sorry, I consider the Hawks as "we") are staying the course, then Penny is a CRITICAL component to our success as a true contender. Penny has generational/blue-chip talent. True SuperBowl contenders have such players. Carson is great, but not blue-chip great. I can imagine Schneider knows this and will do his best to lure Penny back. As far as other contenders, the Packers resign their key players, such as Aaron Jones. I realize AJ had a huge track record compared to Penny, but sometimes a good GM has to take risks.
You really think a RB after 4 years is a generational blue chip talent? After 4 games? Wow. I just checked his log. He has 4 games of high performance this year at the end of the year. And 6 total games in his entire four years of 100 yard plus games. His game logs.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/P/PennRa00/gamelog/
That is not generational blue chip talent to me. I think a bunch of people are suffering from recency bias and you're all going to go back to being quiet when he falls back to earth. But that's me.
But with sports, we have to wait and see. Right now you have this in your head and only his stats falling back in the gutter are going to prove it wrong.
NorthHawk wrote:He was healthy for the start of most years and he couldn’t beat out Carson.
I like Carson, and admire the way he plays, but if Penny was such a stud, he should have best out Carson
for the starting role.
RiverDog wrote:The way I read this, we can't use the franchise tag:
Injuries have prevented Penny from fulfilling his potential thus far in Seattle and with the team declining his option, he will become an unrestricted free agent next March and his future with the team will be hinging on his 2021 performance.
With the deadline for a decision on his fifth-year option looming, Seahawks running back Rashaad Penny will now become an unrestricted free agent in 2022.
According to Ian Rapoport of NFL Network, Seattle is not expected to pick up Penny's fifth-year option, which would have been worth a fully-guaranteed $4.5 million. Under the terms of the latest CBA, his $1.95 million salary for 2021 would also have become fully-guaranteed, which may have played a role in the decision.
https://www.si.com/nfl/seahawks/news/re ... %20million.
It's a moot point anyway as even if we could, it would be very doubtful that we'd use it on him.
Hawktawk wrote:It’s called injury . It’s not hard to understand . When healthy he was taking carries from Carson in 2019 . I recall a 50 + yard house call where a safety bounced off him like a superball , didn’t even slow him down . On the play he was injured he had taken a swing pass about 30 yards and was chopped in the knee on the sideline .
Watching him it’s clear he was mis used as a change of pace back getting a carry or 2 here and there . He’s a bell cow back that needs fed the ball . He’s not just a big fast guy either . He’s got vision and balance and patience . Az spent 4 quarters chopping at his knees every chance they got. Baker grabbed his leg and did a gator roll twisting his knee once causing obvious pain .
I thought he might be hurt but he put up 90 yards after the play. So I think he can take a hit . I think he’s a generational talent with huge question marks but last I checked we had a starter that can’t match this level of performance and is hurt all the time himself . Penney was hurt , never got a chance to develop . Maybe having AP who had a devastating injury and returned to dominance helped him get his mind right .
We drafted him and developed him and now he’s getting ready to pay off. Sign him . I’m not sure why good news about one of our players upsets so many .
Aseahawkfan wrote:
I'm asking you to provide proof that RBs with these type of injuries have turned it around in year four of their contract. I want to hear all these stories that the Penny with the four huge games is the real Penny and not the Penny who couldn't stay healthy and couldn't beat out 7th round pick Chris Carson for the starting job even when he was healthy. I know you forget that stuff when you're all emotionally wound up about Penny and his four game explosion with only one dud game you ignore in the last five games.
You remember that 39 yard game against the L.A. Rams playing against that monster Aaron Donald and that Ram's D-line on 12-21? Did you completely block that game out of your mind while you were ragging on Russ?
Rams D-line took Penny and made him look pedestrian. But they do that to a lot of teams and backs when they are playing well. Too bad Stafford isn't Russell Wilson or they would have a real shot at the Super Bowl. Give Russell that Rams defense, he'll take us deep into the playoffs.
NorthHawk wrote:The problem is it's an extreme rarity for a player to do relatively nothing for 4 years then suddenly become an All Pro, and especially so at a skill position. That rarity means that most GMs (those that don't need to make a splash) will be wary of this sudden development in a contract year. On the other hand it is more common for players to "Flash" for a few games in a contract year and then fall off after receiving a good payday.
That's the quandary we are in with Penny. Is it a temporary accomplishment or is it for real? How much of it just surprise from teams who didn't expect to have to account for him and will they catch on to what he's doing? If the answer is yes to one or both, he may end up falling to the just ordinary RB status from a production PoV and if given a big payday it will become just another bad move by a GM. This is why I doubt we give him a large contract, but a GM wanting to appear to shake things up in their organization might just do so.
But I could be wrong...
NorthHawk wrote: How much of it just surprise from teams who didn't expect
to have to account for him and will they catch on to what he's doing?
But I could be wrong...
tarlhawk wrote:Having to "fight" for his services is not a given. The player who is about to become an Unrestricted Free Agent can meet with the GM and be extended...as long as it happens before March. (March begins the "new football year".)
trents wrote:I'm tired of hearing people say of Penny, "He couldn't beat out Carson even when he was healthy." How big a sample size was that healthy period anyway? And would you expect the new guy on the block to replace a back like Carson who had been productive and was the established player at that position? Tom Brady didn't displace Bledsoe immediately upon joining the Patriots did he?
trents wrote:I'm tired of hearing people say of Penny, "He couldn't beat out Carson even when he was healthy." How big a sample size was that healthy period anyway? And would you expect the new guy on the block to replace a back like Carson who had been productive and was the established player at that position? Tom Brady didn't displace Bledsoe immediately upon joining the Patriots did he?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests