jshawaii22 wrote:Glad to see Penny knows what the "money games" mean. Waits 3 years and 14 games of futile waste of a draft pick (injuries aside he couldn't beat out a 7th round draft pick at any time) and then plays 3 games like a first round draft pick should. Another in a long line of Seahawk high pick failures (Jordyn Brooks might be the exception) that some seem to push aside when evaluating the people making those decisions. It's time for PC/JS to move on.
NorthHawk wrote:Who cares what Walter Football thought of him at the time.
He's underproduced for the time he's been here. Some of it was because of injuries, but most of the time he got on the field he wasn't able to get
the job done. And we passed over the best RB of the draft to get that lack of production from him.
Some team is going to offer him a salary much bigger than we will and he will be off to that team. He may turn out to be a great signing, or not but
he will get a chance to keep his career alive.
On a side note, it's been reported by more than one source that Peterson has had a big impact on the RB's. It seems to be true as all of the RB's have
been running harder since AP arrived. It's almost like he showed them how they had to hit the hole to be successful. We saw Alex Collins improve
when he went to the Ravens and then came back. He played with a lot more confidence and determination than his prior stint here and now we're
seeing not just Penny, but Homer and Dallas running a lot harder, too.
NorthHawk wrote:Who cares what Walter Football thought of him at the time.
He's underproduced for the time he's been here. Some of it was because of injuries, but most of the time he got on the field he wasn't able to get the job done. And we passed over the best RB of the draft to get that lack of production from him.
Stream Hawk wrote:Why is it too late? And the larger question is why all the Penny hate all these years? Takes a while to become good in the NFL. We may be lucky that he finally found “it” and can offer him something to keep it going.
Hawktawk wrote:If he (Penny) had not gotten hurt he’d have been awesome and put Carson on the bench or cut deeply into his carries.
Stream Hawk wrote:Why is it too late? And the larger question is why all the Penny hate all these years? Takes a while to become good in the NFL. We may be lucky that he finally found “it” and can offer him something to keep it going.
obiken wrote:Because if your as old as River, Cbob, or myself, we have seen this so many times before. You have a huge sampling size of what he is, then at the end of contract he has few good games. Sorry, time to let someone else take the risk, we have to move off and move on.
RiverDog wrote:That's true. To hear some tell it, the only problem Penny had was his injuries. It's true that he had a few flashes of brilliance, but nowhere near the type that would justify a first round selection. Unlike Carson, he wasn't a good enough blocker to be a 3 down running back.
tarlhawk wrote:"that would justify" Really? Fans always have opinions of who "should have been selected...or this guy was not worthy of a 1rst Rd. pick" ...
tarlhawk wrote:Pass Blocking as a 3rd down back is a necessity that not all college feature backs come tailor made for...depending on the program we drafted from. It was reported that Christian Michaels arrived with an attitude of not putting in the work (willing to learn pass pro) to become a complete feature back. I hadn't seen Penny being reported in a similar fashion...his initial low snap count no doubt reflected it was a slow learning technique for him but he seemed to put in the time as he started getting more snaps before his untimely injuries.
Stream Hawk wrote:Why is it too late? And the larger question is why all the Penny hate all these years? Takes a while to become good in the NFL. We may be lucky that he finally found “it” and can offer him something to keep it going.
obiken wrote:Because if your as old as River, Cbob, or myself, we have seen this so many times before. You have a huge sampling size of what he is, then at the end of contract he has few good games. Sorry, time to let someone else take the risk, we have to move off and move on.
Forgot you're so bitter Chubb wasn't drafted...I gave the report as info that was pre-draft for "those" unaware of Penny...and how accurate some reports are when presented. "Some?" of his lack of production was injury related...you shape your posts in a narrow light when upset about a player (Chubb) ...so its no wonder you focus your ire on the GM and the RB he chose over Chubb.
Aseahawkfan wrote:4 years in near the end of the season he's found it? Then he comes back next year, we sign him, he gets injured again when he's the focus of the offense? Then what do you say?
I don't know how some of you get so enamored of a running back after 4 years after a couple of games. This guy has produced nothing substantial. He's just running well in garbage time. He's got a lot to prove to make it in this league. If that proof doesn't come at a reasonable price, then he can go try to prove it with another team.
Aseahawkfan wrote:4 years in near the end of the season he's found it? Then he comes back next year, we sign him, he gets injured again when he's the focus of the offense? Then what do you say?
I don't know how some of you get so enamored of a running back after 4 years after a couple of games. This guy has produced nothing substantial. He's just running well in garbage time. He's got a lot to prove to make it in this league. If that proof doesn't come at a reasonable price, then he can go try to prove it with another team.
Stream Hawk wrote:Produced nothing substantial? He has the 2nd most 25+ carries this season, behind JT. And with how many less carries? As far as injuries, same could be for anyone. Penny was not injury prone out of college anyway.
But, yes, have him prove it at a reasonable price next year. Make it enticing, of course. I didn't say let's throw an SA like franchise breaking contract at the guy.
TriCitySam wrote:Certainly Penney has always had the talent, and at the time there were plenty of teams that passed on Chubb and some reports were that some teams wanted Penney after Seattle took him.....but as with any draft, it's a crap shoot and you simply don't know what the future holds. In Penny's case, he had all the tools and led the nation in rushing in college, but the injury bug took away his pro career.
If I could get him at a decent price, fine. If not I'd say pass. History says you do not get more healthy as you age. But with our recent luck, he'll go to another team and play lights out for the next 4 years
Hawktawk wrote:He’s going to be more expensive than anyone thinks . He’s got a skill set far beyond Carson , the ability to change games with 1 play . Forget history of injury whether he didn’t beat out Carson or if he was given the same touches .It’s strictly the eyeball test including eyeballing his stat line . Right now 2021 you pick Carson or Penney
Plenty of GMs smarter than me eyeballing penney too . Teams will make a run .
RiverDog wrote: Each player has their own challenges. The fact is that Penny could never beat out Carson as the #1 running back, and that includes at the start of this season when both were healthy.
tarlhawk wrote:I've made this opinion before but I feel the Seahawks wanted two feature backs with different running styles to work both into the game...I don't think Penny was drafted to replace Carson otherwise Chubb had more chutzpah. I also think Penny possibly would take over kick returns as a rookie but a sudden penchant for injury eliminates any plans to give a rookie more exposure to injury. Alex Collins has the college pedigree to become a short yardage back who can burst at any time the opponent lets up.. If anyone remembers the Miami backfield that excelled at running...you had Csonka for power/Mercury Morris for explosive speed around the edge/Jim Kiick for finesse/receiving.
It would be nice if both can sustain full health...I hope Josh Johnson gets an opportunity for 2nd year growth.
NorthHawk wrote:A team doesn't make a player a first draft pick in the hopes he can be a good change of pace or backup player.
They are expected to be the starter at some point the first year and if not then, starting the 2nd year.
As ObS said, he only started 1 year in College and couldn't beat our someone named Palfry who in that lesser league was one of the top yardage gainers in CFB.
So the chances of him being a very good RB were not as good as it sounds.
Maybe he has turned a corner, we won't know until next year but it's quite obvious we need a good RB to challenge him if we keep him and replace him if we don't.
NorthHawk wrote:I wouldn't count on any of that. Pete and John have made a shambles of the draft on the Offensive side.
They really haven't hit on much outside of Lockett and Metcalf of late with maybe Lewis and the past 2 years still TBD.
Their hubris in passing by great talent for a long shot hasn't worked at all and they need to get back to selecting quality.
Their history doesn't match our needs and it's unreasonable to expect it to change.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests