c_hawkbob wrote:No we don't. And I'll be shocked if we get one. it'll come whenever the Vulcan suits decide it's time (and the ain't necessarily sports fans).
TriCitySam wrote:Said it before, and I continue to disagree with blowing it all up. We have some significant issues, but I don't feel Pete is the problem, and I don't buy into Florio although he says it bears a "mention", so he doesn't believe it either). Pete's a good coach. Does he need to make some changes? Yup. I think Norton needs to go and I think you have to take a real hard look at JS and maybe figure out where we're really at with Russ. The personnel decisions - both drafting and FA - are decisions made upon recommendations by JS and his staff (I understand Pete has final say, but he's not the one doing the evaluations). The results have been disappointing. Same goes for where we spend our $.....OL is where I would start.
NorthHawk wrote:I don’t think his new contract has any bearing on whether he stays or not.
When asked after signing his new contract how long he expects to coach he said he takes it year by year
and if he’s not enjoying it he will move on. I can’t imagine this year being fun for him and I don’t
think he’s interested in a multi year rebuild, and if Russ wants out then it will probably be even worse.
He’s 70 years old and he looked all of it after the game, so if the fun is gone for him he’ll probably leave.
All good things come to an end and it looks like this is it for this regime.
They tried to reset a few years ago and it has failed miserably, so maybe it’s time to move on.
tarlhawk wrote:His new contract was only signed last year...is this the cancel culture at work here? There are many factors at play here to describe the unraveling of our season. What precedent would be set firing the most successful coach of your franchise a year after winning us the difficult NFC Championship and signing a new 4 yr extension? Successful businesses don't make knee jerk responses to a losing venture when its business flourished after back to back successes with sustained coaching...8yrs under Mike Holmgren and 10 years under Pete...with Mora being the 2009 mistake. Tom Landry and Don Shula retired on their terms ...each replaced by Jimmy Johnson who boasted the game had passed them by (each of the legends he succeeded).
c_hawkbob wrote:But he didn't say anything. He didn't say fire Pete or trade Russ or anything, other than he wanted to be in on the decision.
Hawktawk wrote:Cancel culture ? Lol . And not sure where you got your information about Landry and Shula . Tom Landry was informed he was fired by a phone call. And after a pretty bad stretch to end his career Johnson promptly won 2 Super Bowls . Shula retired after getting beat 63 -7 in the divisional by Jacksonville . It was Marino’s last game as well.
NorthHawk wrote:I don’t think his new contract has any bearing on whether he stays or not.
Hawktawk wrote:I read an article this morning discussing potential job openings and it was pointed out there was no black Monday after this new rule . I’ve heard a lot of the names now , Leftwich, Daboll, Dennis Allen , the Kc coordinator bienemy. So question. Do any of those guys appeal enough to Seattle to cut a guy with 117 wins ? Even after this year?
Hawktawk wrote:I read an article this morning discussing potential job openings and it was pointed out there was no black Monday after this new rule . I’ve heard a lot of the names now , Leftwich, Daboll, Dennis Allen , the Kc coordinator bienemy. So question. Do any of those guys appeal enough to Seattle to cut a guy with 117 wins ? Even after this year?
trents wrote: 117 wins means nothing for now and for the future.
RiverDog wrote:So now you're advocating that we cut Russell? And I suppose that you want to replace him with Geno?
tarlhawk wrote:The winning seasons do matter when you're not making changes to your head coach/GM/QB...they establish a winning pattern to get through this losing season...replace any or all... and your losing season can become the new trend.
TriCitySam wrote:I don't for a minute believe any owner in the NFL would fire Pete, after one losing season, and there are some owners that are not very bright. It's remotely possible he may decide to walk away, and there may be a realignment of duties, but getting fired? Almost zero chance. If your goal is to get the #1 draft pick, then hire guys like Dennis Allen, or better yet, just bring Tom Flores back.
TriCitySam wrote:I don't for a minute believe any owner in the NFL would fire Pete, after one losing season, and there are some owners that are not very bright. It's remotely possible he may decide to walk away, and there may be a realignment of duties, but getting fired? Almost zero chance. If your goal is to get the #1 draft pick, then hire guys like Dennis Allen, or better yet, just bring Tom Flores back.
Hawktawk wrote: Holmgren didn’t win a playoff game in Seattle for 6 seasons.
RiverDog wrote: For the umpteenth time, our team has not been a SB contender for the past 7 seasons. This current season is simply the coup de grace. And for the record, I've never said he'd be fired, just simply done as a coach, whether it be through resignation, retirement, re-assignment of duties, or whatever. Now at 5-10 after a Chicago Bears loss, it is so over.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests