Aseahawkfan wrote:Percy was an all around team cancer and selfish player. So I'm going with Harvin by a country mile. We got nothing but a kick return TD in a Super Bowl we had won in the first quarter. If Percy weren't here, we would have still won the Super Bowl running away. Percy was the least return on investment and a terrible trade for a terrible person.
NorthHawk wrote:The reason I didn't select Harvin was he was one guy on a team of strong leaders, so although disruptive and a cancer, he also added something quite different to the team.
NorthHawk wrote:Graham offered us a lot of potential, but like all things in Pete Ball he had to conform to Pete's Offensive philosophy which is to become a complete TE. Graham wasn't, isn't and will never be that but for years Pete demanded it and never took advantage of what made Graham special. It's another case of trading for a player and not knowing how to use him properly.
NorthHawk wrote:Adams doesn't add much of anything and is probably the 2nd best S on the Seahawks. Not good enough when giving up a starting player at the same position, 2 first round picks, a 3rd round pick, for him and a 4th in the 2022 draft. Sure, he had one year where he was the leading sacker on the team, but that's not sustainable and shows how bad our DL was to be forced to use him that way. It wouldn't surprise me with the injuries he seems to get every year that he will be retired in 3 or 4 years. Horrible, horrible trade.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Their x's and o's logic was sound on Adams. He was a top 5 draft pick safety who is an amazing strong safety on par with Kam Chancellor. He was a Pro Bowler, young in his first contract, not known to be a locker room cancer, and willing to lay it all on the line to win. He's a Seahawk type of player.
Aseahawkfan wrote:My big problem is Pete and John seem to still be of the mindset we're one or two players away from a Super Bowl. We're not. They have been letting the team degrade too much over the years, missing too many picks, and not developing young talent either because the talent is bad or their coaching staff isn't good at development.
If they had picked up Jamal Adams after they rebuilt the defensive line, I think he would be an amazing addition. But you got no defense if you have no defensive line. You're going to get pushed around and your LBs and secondary are going to have to try to bat clean up. And that wears them down and sets them up for injury. I think all the pass rushing last year hurt Jamal's shoulder. Safeties should not be rushing the passer that much period. They aren't big enough to survive the scrum at the lines.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Percy was an unnecessary luxury. We were already an amazing defensive unit with enough offense to win.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Graham the same. Pete kept talking about TD makers. We were scoring enough TDs.
RiverDog wrote:
In any event, all three of those trades, by far the three biggest trades we've made since at least Pete's tenure, if not the entire 45 year history of the franchise, were all complete flops and on their own justification for getting rid of Pete and Schneider.
tarlhawk wrote:Not one or two...but 4-5 would re-new us as contenders...they haven't been "letting" the team degrade...welcome to the reality of too many wins and the NFL has tools in place to take down your talent core. The best way to stay on top is via the draft but each year selecting from the bottom of the draft rounds vice in the top 15 or so of each round hurts your odds at scoring a draft "hit". R. Sherman/Kam Chancellor/Russel Wilson and similar "finds/gems" were by having higher round selections not the bottom dozen choices (of each round) winning teams select from...for every successful Patriots franchise you have ten bottom feeders in a system designed to stop Franchise dynasties and try to prevent perennial losers.
Our lights out defense would be handicapped today by the NFL's efforts to re-shape a teams focus from defense to bombs away offense. Richard Sherman recognized this when a reporter asked him if the coach asked him to switch to WR when we suffered a rash of injuries to our receiving corps. Of course he replied no...he hadn't been asked but he said he would welcome taking advantage of the NFL altering rules that favor WR while broadening what constitutes pass interference and burdens the secondary.
In college more and more of your best athletes choose to learn the WR route to the NFL and not the Defensive back route. The defense functions best as a team with synchronizing "parts". Our pass rush has suffered from the weakness in our secondary...both function well together. Our defense suffered while our secondary was being shaped ...Tre Brown/Sidney Jones at LCB and DJ Reed at RCB give us hope for the future...our glaring weakness is an inability to play successful "Man to Man" coverage for more than a brief "shakeup".
Playing too soft makes even your opponents QB back-ups Quick release "assassins" which effectively negates even the best pass rush. We have seen our Defense flash when our secondary is denying primary targets while forcing QB's to check down for open receivers...as this allows more time for our Pass Rush to either break through or draw a holding call on our opponents O-Line.
Grahm became a bad trade when we weren't looking for a trade to get him...the Saints GM offered him up while conversing with our own GM on a different matter. We didn't have a true taller Outside receiver for red zone attacks by R. Wilson...Baldwin was our best and being smaller was an over achiever like Lockett has been. John Schneider wanted to get new receiving red zone weapons to explore RW's budding talents...but perhaps telling the Saints GM "we'll get back to you"...we punched the ticket of a bad trade temptation.
NorthHawk wrote:The problem with the Adams trade was his talents don’t fit what our Defense does.
So Pete traded for him but STILL doesn’t know how to use him. As well he didn’t have a framework
of a contract in place but he knew Adams wanted a huge salary. Those missteps are stunning in
magnitude.
Btw, Diggs was voted to the Pro Bowl this year.
NorthHawk wrote:The problem with the Adams trade was his talents don’t fit what our Defense does.
So Pete traded for him but STILL doesn’t know how to use him. As well he didn’t have a framework
of a contract in place but he knew Adams wanted a huge salary. Those missteps are stunning in
magnitude.
Btw, Diggs was voted to the Pro Bowl this year.
I-5 wrote:This doesn't answer the poll, but far worse than any of these 3 trades are the complete inability to draft NFL calibre players since the departure of Scott McCloughan in April 2014. With a very few exceptions (Lockett, Metcalf, Carson, Taylor).
Adams fits this defense just fine. He's a hard banging strong safety. But that's a luxury when you don't have a D-line or a secondary. People would be loving Adams is all the pieces around him were as good as they were around Kam
Adams fits this defense just fine. He's a hard banging strong safety. But that's a luxury when you don't have a D-line or a secondary. People would be loving Adams is all the pieces around him were as good as they were around Kam
NorthHawk wrote:Then why after a year with Adams Pete said this year that they are still figuring out how to use him?
If he fit fine, he would have an established role early and Pete wouldn't have said that.
He's not a Kam Chancellor and he's not an ET. He floats somewhere in the middle where he's not good enough to be a ball hawk and not big enough to intimidate WR's.
He is a good tackler for the most part but until he has a defined role he's not going to do as well as he might in another Defense like how Greg Williams used him.
Pete's Defense is not designed for a blitzing Safety to succeed, rather it's designed to get pressure from the front 4.
tarlhawk wrote:Kam Chancellor Scouting Report
Position: FS
Conference: ACC
School: Virginia Tech Hokies
Year/Status: Drafted
Jersey Number: #17
Height & Weight: 6'4 - 230 lbs.
Drafted 5th Rd 2nd pick in 5th round in 2010 by SEA
2010 NFL Draft Prospect Scouting Report:
Kam Chancellor, FS, Virginia Tech
There is not much Kam Chancellor has not done. Arriving at Virginia Tech in 2006, he worked at quarterback. Then he was moved to corner, where he spent his freshman season playing spot duty. In 2007 he earned the starting job at the Hokies rover position. Even with a ton of talent around him on the defensive side of the ball that season, Chancellor ended the year with 79 total tackles. However, Chancellor's final destination was not at the rover position. Prior to the 2008 season, he moved to free safety. At 6-4 and 230 pounds, Chancellor is big and strong and rarely fails to deliver the big hit. He has a decent amount of speed and has all the measurables that NFL teams will be looking for. Chancellor could have gone pro after his junior season, but he made the right decision returning to the Hokies. While Chancellor did a fine job in 2008 at the free safety position, he is getting noticeably more comfortable there during the 2009 campaign. Chancellor has found his home at free safety and now the NFL knows where he fits. Chancellor should be considered one of the top two or three free safeties in this class and if he keeps putting up big numbers in 2009, he has a slight chance of being a first-round selection. 2/1 Update: Chancellor had good East-West Shrine workouts and he is bigger and stronger than most other top free safeties in this class. However, his lack of speed is a concern and he will need to put up some great times at the NFL Combine to sneak into the second round. Even if he runs a 4.6, as expected, he should still be a third or fourth rounder.
So many Jamal Adams naysayers
6 ft tall 214 lbs ...Jamal Adams ran a 4.56 at the NFL Combine:
“We broke down the film,” said George Adams, a former Kentucky running back and first-round pick in 1985. “We saw where he stood up. (He lost) 0.8 (seconds) before he even took off. We knew he could run a 4.4.”
He did one better.
Adams — free of those nerves — ran a 4.33 40-yard dash Wednesday at LSU’s pro day, capturing the buzz of this yearly event in the school’s indoor practice facility.
No one finished with a faster 40 time. Former LSU track national champion Cyril Grayson, competing at pro day, could only equal the mark. Adams’ score filtered through the crowd seconds after he completed the dash and before it posted on the large projection screen in the indoor facility.
Tre’Davious White rushed to Adams to tell him the news: 4.33! 4.33! 4.33!
“Coming into the combine, that’s what he told me he was going to run there,” receiver Malachi Dupre said. “He didn’t, but I know he’s run that before. I knew he was (that fast). It’s just a matter of doing it when the lights are on. He did.”
Jamal Adams
40 Yard Dash/4.56
Bench Press/18
Vertical Jump/31.5
Broad Jump/120
3 Cone Drill/6.96
20 Yd Shuttle/4.13
60 Yd Shuttle/11.92
The son of a former NFL running back (George, who played at Kentucky and on the Super Bowl champion New York Giants team of 1986) looks like he's grown up with the game. Even in LSU's always-loaded secondary, the nation's top safety recruit got on the field a significant amount as a true freshman (two starts, 66 tackles, five break-ups, 10 special teams tackles). When given the chance to start as a sophomore, Adams garnered second-team All-SEC honors by making 67 stops, four interceptions and six pass break-ups. Coaches voted him second-team all-conference after his junior year (76 tackles, 7.5 for loss, one interception, four pass break-ups) even though the Associated Press put him on their first-team All-American squad due to his all-around impact for the Tigers' defense.
By Lance Zierlein NFL Analyst
NFL Comparison Darren Woodson
Overview
Interchangeable safety with a sheriff's mentality. Adams is a physical tone-setter who should thrive near the line of scrimmage or in a robber role. Should be a commanding presence in the locker room early on and his do-as-I-do play demeanor could be the catalyst for turning a struggling defense around quickly.
Strengths
Natural-born leader of men
Well-built
Will not hesitate for one second as a hitter
Steps downhill looking to punish running backs to set a tone for defense
Toggles between patient and urgent in treks to the ball
Plays off blockers
Approaches target with open arms and wide, balanced base to limit escape routes
Intelligent field general
Gets secondary aligned properly
Plays with plus balance in coverage
Pattern reader who can digest combinations
Alert for misdirection keys from offense
Party crasher on screen plays
Can handle coverage responsibilities against tight ends
Five interceptions and two recovered fumbles over last two seasons at LSU
Special-teams terror as freshman and sophomore, notching 21 tackles
No penalties in 2016
Father, George, was a first-round pick of the Giants in 1984
Weaknesses
Handsy and too willing to clamp onto receivers down the field
Hard-charging downhill, but a little stiff when asked to retreat
Long speed appears to be average on tape
Eyes drop when targets approach his area
Anticipation is average, limiting his range as a center-fielder
Will give away some interceptions due to drops
Slower coming to balance as tackler on bursting runners between the tackles
Desire to limit cutbacks leads to challenging play-side tackles
Doesn't pursue with expected vigor from across the field
Aggressiveness opens him up against play-action
Sources Tell Us
"The people who have been at that program the longest think he might be the best leader LSU has had in years. He's a no-doubt first-rounder. He can play all over the field and he could have an immediate impact on defense just like Landon Collins did coming out. I love him. I think he's a winner." - AFC area scout
GRADE
8.0 The perfect prospect
7.3-7.5 Perennial All-Pro
7.0-7.1 Pro Bowl talent
6.7-6.8 Year 1 quality starter
RiverDog wrote:During his entire career, Kam Chancellor had just two QB sacks, and none in the 2012, 2013, and 2014 seasons, the years we were the most dominate. Jamal Adams had 9.5 sacks for us in 2020, so it's pretty clear that they aren't similar players and even more clear that Pete hasn't been using Adams the way he did Kam.
Aseahawkfan wrote:He's using him more like Kam this year with more pass rush attempts.
The only reason he didn't use him like Kam from the start is because we don't have the surrounding pieces like Kam had at all. Jamal Adams is a high performing strong safety. He is getting blamed for playing on what was already a bad defense.
Adams is a good x's and o's pick for this defense. He just doesn't have the pieces around him like a Kam had. Until you have those pieces, who cares if you have a great strong safety.
Hawktawk wrote: He was brought in to win now , the team is 5-9 and he’s out . The draft capital , the cap hit. A massive contract extension . If he were out there being the guy in your draft report it is still too expensive . Now that he’s not it’s just a disaster . Worst trade of the era .
RiverDog wrote:Which is part of what makes this a bad trade. You do not build a great defense around a strong safety. You said it yourself, Adams needs "surrounding pieces" in order to excel. There's a reason why safeties are the lowest paid position on the defense. \
When the trade occurred, I thought that Pete had something special planned for Adams, that the defense would somehow revolve around him, that he'd make our defense better. Why else would you give up so much draft capital and sign him to such a big contract? I trusted Pete to know what he was doing. But Pete came out and said at the start of this season that they were still trying to figure out how to use him, and this season, I haven't seen Adams doing anything to justify such a huge amount of draft capital and such a large contract. He's not getting sacks, tackles for loss, stuffing running plays at the LOS, or defending passes. He cleans up after a reception and makes a few tackles after a running back breaks into the 2nd level. He's not bad in that role, but it's not worth what we paid.
Pay your own guys. Build through the draft. Stop bringing in players from other teams you plan to pay more than the guys who give you everything you already had here. It's disrespectful. It causes a breakdown in the locker room.
I see the Percy Havin trade as the start of Pete and John's bad roster management policy that has led us to where we are now.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I can agree with this. Elite strong safeties are nice to have, but Kam even back then was a luxury. Earl was the necessity around which the Legion of Boom was built.
I don't think it has to do with x's and o's meaning on the field strategy. Maybe you mean roster management with that term, I wasn't sure. As far as the x's and o's of roster management, you don't build around a strong safety.
I think Percy was a worst trade because he was a known locker room cancer. We didn't need him. He didn't provide much production for us. He started a rift in the locker room. I think he was one of the trades that made some of the other players unhappy in that we brought him from the outside rather than pay one of the guys we have. It was one of the first trades that was a thumb your nose at the guys who got you there as you pick up some shiny toy that you would have to pay more than the men in the locker room you drafted who got you there. It set a bad precedent all around and continued on with the Graham and Adams trade.
Pay your own guys. Build through the draft. Stop bringing in players from other teams you plan to pay more than the guys who give you everything you already had here. It's disrespectful. It causes a breakdown in the locker room.
I see the Percy Havin trade as the start of Pete and John's bad roster management policy that has led us to where we are now.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Pay your own guys. Build through the draft. Stop bringing in players from other teams you plan to pay more than the guys who give you everything you already had here. It's disrespectful. It causes a breakdown in the locker room.
Hawktawk wrote:I still see Adams as the worst trade . He is injured for the second year in a row . I’ll give him a few more credits than some . I read where someone said he’s not big enough to intimidate receivershe is a very big fast strong safety that hits like a bigger man . He’s one of the most violent aggressive players we have . I love his attitude . But he never had been a ballhawk , is terrible in coverage , ranked 70 something in coverage . Bad shoulders affect a persons ability to reach above their head to Intercept or tip a ball and there is only so much the best surgeons can do for a shoulder after repeated injuries . Again it couldn’t be anticipated but injuries make it the worst possible trade ever .
Hawktawk wrote:I still see Adams as the worst trade . He is injured for the second year in a row . I’ll give him a few more credits than some . I read where someone said he’s not big enough to intimidate receivershe is a very big fast strong safety that hits like a bigger man . He’s one of the most violent aggressive players we have . I love his attitude . But he never had been a ballhawk , is terrible in coverage , ranked 70 something in coverage . Bad shoulders affect a persons ability to reach above their head to Intercept or tip a ball and there is only so much the best surgeons can do for a shoulder after repeated injuries . Again it couldn’t be anticipated but injuries make it the worst possible trade ever .
Aseahawkfan wrote:
I still think Adams is injured because they used him too much in the scrum. Adams has the old school Legion of Boom and Kenney Easley attitude. When you have that attitude as a safety, you break your body apart quickly, especially if you're sent into the scrum against the 300 lb. guys who will rip a 200 lb. guy apart.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests