Hawktawk wrote:We’re putting him on IR. Labrum tear and other significant damage . Shoulder injury 2 years in a row now . Totally damaged goods now just when he was starting to play well .
RiverDog wrote:Even when he was playing well, he still wasn't an impact player that would justify the draft capital we gave up and giving him a contract that made him the highest paid safety in the game.
I said when Pete made this trade and later when he resigned him that Adams had better be damn good, that I was trusting his judgement. Well, the jury is in, and the Adams trade/signing is a miserable failure.
trents wrote:Sports news services are reporting that Adams is definitely out for the year and will be or has already had surgery to repair the torn labrum.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/as ... ar-AARC90M
obiken wrote:Hes a bust.
obiken wrote:Hes a bust.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Yep. One of the many bad trades by Pete and John that have this team where they are now. Pete and John have forgotten how to manage a roster.
I didn't like the Harvin trade because of the person. He was head case, and nearly destroyed our team. I didn't like the Graham trade because he was not the type of tight end that fits into a run first offense as he was too soft, not a good inline blocker, plus we traded away an all pro center without a viable replacement.
Hawktawk wrote:Asked about the Adams trade yesterday following the diagnosis Carroll said “ it was a great trade for us “. Yeah . He did . He addressed the actual injury in Pete happy speak about getting it “ fixed up”. Not much more needs to be said here . This man should not be picking kids for a grid kids team much less stocking an NFL roster .
NorthHawk wrote:That's the proverbial Used Car Salesman aspect of him that we talked about when he was first hired.
I can understand why some veterans tune him out and then have to leave or go on their own.
Hawktawk wrote:It’s kind of like saying of washed up AP “ we finally got him “ it is laughable . It’s like Pete is not really dealing with reality .
Hawktawk wrote:It’s kind of like saying of washed up AP “ we finally got him “ it is laughable . It’s like Pete is not really dealing with reality .
tarlhawk wrote:Not giving much thought to the possibility he is the eternal optimist who keeps his team from folding it up when one of your stars goes down. Why focus on a trade you are dissatisfied with because the all-pro you got has been hurt to the same repaired injury? Is there any glee that Marquise Blair has hurt the same area that was surgically repaired. If you all hate Pete Carrol so much why focus on things he and J.S. can't control...and that's the rate at which modern athletes in Football get hurt to the point that it sends promising careers down in flames.
In the NFL you accept the losses as well as the victories in games as well as seasons...this is not fantasy football but players who entertain us at the risk of attaining life changing interests for a game they love to play. Winning is an addiction all of it's own and shows up often from a fan base...I guess fan base is short for fantasy base?
NorthHawk wrote:We're simply looking at reality and the reality is we have a bad team that has been barely treading water for the last few years and without Wilson's heroics
we would be talking about successive losing seasons. The facts are Wilson wants to go elsewhere and Pete doesn't have many answers. Even if we roll the
table for the rest of the year, we're still a bad team with no hope of progressing in the playoffs. The Adams trade is simply the worst in franchise history.
Multiple 1st round picks, a 3rd and a starting Safety for Adams and a 4th round pick to a team who didn't consider Adams to be in their future. That it
took Pete the better part of a year to figure out how to use Adams says a whole lot about how the team is constructed.
Pete and John did wonders and got us a SB win. That can never be taken away, but they've lost their way in how to build a team and since Pete has final
say on personnel, he should get most of the blame for how poorly we have played and how nobody expects us to compete for a championship.
tarlhawk wrote:
Not dealing with reality? His comment only referred to the time spent since his first pursuit of recruiting him to play at USC...it reflects a sense of humor not a reality check of thinking you "captured AP thinking he could still perform at his peak". Pete never referred to him as a rescue of Seattle's running game...but as a chance for our young RB room to see how a Pro with strong character prepares for a game against imposing odds of winning. Success rarely shows up for a team thinking its hopeless to compete. Adrian Peterson was good for professional character as well as another strong locker presence for a team struggling with adversity and failed seasonal expectations. Life is more enjoyable from a positive viewpoint when put into its proper perspective given the relevance of the current world's situation.
tarlhawk wrote:Not giving much thought to the possibility he is the eternal optimist who keeps his team from folding it up when one of your stars goes down. Why focus on a trade you are dissatisfied with because the all-pro you got has been hurt to the same repaired injury? Is there any glee that Marquise Blair has hurt the same area that was surgically repaired. If you all hate Pete Carrol so much why focus on things he and J.S. can't control...and that's the rate at which modern athletes in Football get hurt to the point that it sends promising careers down in flames.
In the NFL you accept the losses as well as the victories in games as well as seasons...this is not fantasy football but players who entertain us at the risk of attaining life changing interests for a game they love to play. Winning is an addiction all of it's own and shows up often from a fan base...I guess fan base is short for fantasy base?
trents wrote:Yes, but you can't expect Pete to give an answer like, "Those were two terrible acquisitions. I wish we hadn't done it." It wouldn't be appropriate for him to dis a player still on the team. That would destroy team moral. Put yourself in his place. What would you have said?
trents wrote:And concerning AP, would do you have to lose by bringing him onboard? Nothing to lose by doing so. He was on waivers wasn't he? And can we really make a judgement yet about his ability to contribute on the field? How many snaps has he taken? It's a very small sample.
RiverDog wrote:[
I don't have a problem bringing him in except at this point, it's a bit like closing the corral gate after the horses got out. I would have rather seen him give some young prospect on the practice squad a shot. Snaps and carries in an NFL regular season games are a precious commodity. AP is 100% not part of our future.
Hawktawk wrote:He said it was a "great trade for us" after the shoulder diagnosis that guarantees 8 missed games in 2 years on a 4-8 team in which he misses many opportunities to alter outcomes when Russ was struggling and then Geno starting, dropped interceptions, blown coverages, personal fouls. I love his intensity but his a bigger bob sanders that hits so hard he blows himself up eventually. Pete Carroll should be the man and say "clearly it hasn't gone as we hoped". That's honesty. He is simply lying to say hes pleased.
NorthHawk wrote:So you think this team has been getting better every year?
If you do, you're delusional. We have not improved, we have simply stayed the same - treading water if you will.
Again, without Wilson's heroics we would have had losing seasons before this one.
Success is not repeating the same results year in and year out like we have. Sure we won more games than lost, but
we were embarrassingly thumped by the Rams in the playoff game last year and really had no business winning the Division.
Success is improving and we haven't improved for the last 7 years.
I never said I thought our team was "improving every year"...I acknowledge the fact the NFL is a business first (entertainment/tv revenues) organization. The NFL imposes rules to suppress building any dynasty ...or perennial loser. Poor management/leadership can create a perennial loser. Many things have to "fall in place" to overcome the NFL's imposed winner/loser cycling. An elite QB gives a competitive edge in winning close games.
As a fan base we have taken for granted year after year of winning...not always seeing the cost of selecting very low in draft after draft...or having to wait in line for waiver nuggets to fall to our waiver position...the real reality is the financial cost of keeping fan heroes around (RW and Bobby Wagner) gives John Schneider slimmer room to maneuver...his draft choices/free agent acquisitions have to be "on the mark". A fair equivalent would be stretching fewer depleted resources to keep an ever growing population "comfortable/competitive.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests