So who's lying? Is Brown vaccinated or not? If he is, indeed, vaccinated, then it would be very easy to prove it by producing the same card they gave the rest of us, so why aren't they challenging the suspension?
obiken wrote:My Issue River, is why didnt they suspend Aaron Rogers for not vaxing and then lying about it. Its either racism or a double standard.
NorthHawk wrote:According to PFT, Rodgers wasn’t suspended because he didn’t lie to the league. Brown et al did apparently.
What makes Browns actions so stupid is he could have just said he wasn’t vaccinated, but he tried to play games and now he’s paying the price.
trents wrote:No, not racism. I realize that's a popular resort these days but I see no reason to go there in this situation. Rogers deceived. Brown committed fraud.
Hawktawk wrote:Rodger was allowed to flaunt team and league protocols despite them knowing he was deceiving the public ,no masks while in team facilities, traveling with the team instead of alone etc. It violated the spirit and intention of every rule the league made. Last year teams were fined nearly a million dollars and fined 6th round draft picks for far lesser violations. Its utter horsesh@t, another case of favoritism of a star player and a foundational franchise by the league. Its a joke. They have no credibility.
NorthHawk wrote:According to PFT, Rodgers wasn’t suspended because he didn’t lie to the league.
Brown et al did apparently.
What makes Browns actions so stupid is he could have just said he wasn’t vaccinated, but he tried
to play games and now he’s paying the price.
NorthHawk wrote:Rodgers lied to us, but he didn't lie to the league. That's the point.
That he wasn't disciplined for violating league rules for being maskless is quite another question and I think the NFL has stated that they left it up
to teams to make those types of calls and penalize players.
NorthHawk wrote:Rodgers lied to us, but he didn't lie to the league. That's the point.
That he wasn't disciplined for violating league rules for being maskless is quite another question and I think the NFL has stated that they left it up
to teams to make those types of calls and penalize players.
c_hawkbob wrote:How can you say he didn't lie to the league? Because he told them he was "immunized" instead? He obviously mislead the league as he was allowed to fly and attend pressers unmasked which indicates the league bought his "immunized" as interchangeable with "vaccinated". You as much as anyone are buying into the infinitesimal difference between technically lying and intentionally misleading.
Rogers, on the account of "lying" is every inch as guilty as Brown! The ONLY discernable difference in reality being the faked immunization card.
RiverDog wrote:
Rodgers didn't misrepresent his vaccination status to the team/league. He told the team that he wasn't vaxxed. The people he lied to was the press and the public. IMO the team should have been disciplined much heavier than they were for letting Rodgers violate the protocols and Rodgers for "conduct detrimental to the league", ie the Personal Conduct Policy, by lying about his status to the public and his flagrant disregard for league and union agreed upon protocols, but that's just me.
Brown DID misrepresent his vaccination status by apparently producing a phony vaccination card. That's the difference.
Hawktawk wrote:Point being Rodgers was maskless in pressers and in the facility and more important was allowed to fly with the team. Its hair splitting and semantics to say he committed less of an offense. He endangered people. The league didn't want to see Reggie Love vs Seattle after seeing him vs KC. it was about ratings and $$$$ Had to make the call quick . Little did they know Reggie Love would have looked like Bart Starr compared to Russ.
I BUY 0% OF ANY OF IT
Are you certain of that? I do not believe that to be the case. I think that's just the team and the league putting as pretty a shine on that turd as possible to get out of having to discipline it's mega-star.
RiverDog wrote:
Rodgers didn't misrepresent his vaccination status to the team/league. He told the team that he wasn't vaxxed. The people he lied to was the press and the public. IMO the team should have been disciplined much heavier than they were for letting Rodgers violate the protocols and Rodgers for "conduct detrimental to the league", ie the Personal Conduct Policy, by lying about his status to the public and his flagrant disregard for league and union agreed upon protocols, but that's just me.
Brown DID misrepresent his vaccination status by apparently producing a phony vaccination card. That's the difference.
c_hawkbob wrote:Are you certain of that? I do not believe that to be the case. I think that's just the team and the league putting as pretty a shine on that turd as possible to get out of having to discipline it's mega-star.
RiverDog wrote:
Rodgers didn't misrepresent his vaccination status to the team/league. He told the team that he wasn't vaxxed. The people he lied to was the press and the public. IMO the team should have been disciplined much heavier than they were for letting Rodgers violate the protocols and Rodgers for "conduct detrimental to the league", ie the Personal Conduct Policy, by lying about his status to the public and his flagrant disregard for league and union agreed upon protocols, but that's just me.
Brown DID misrepresent his vaccination status by apparently producing a phony vaccination card. That's the difference.
c_hawkbob wrote:Are you certain of that? I do not believe that to be the case. I think that's just the team and the league putting as pretty a shine on that turd as possible to get out of having to discipline it's mega-star.
RiverDog wrote:If Brown did not misrepresent his vaccination status, don't you think that he would have appealed the suspension? It's costing him a cool $1 million.
As far as whether or not he produced a phony card, I don't know how else he's going to "misrepresent" being vaccinated. Do you?
c_hawkbob wrote:I'm questioning your contention that Rogers didn't misrepresent his vaccination status to the league/team. I know Brown did.
trents wrote:No, not racism. I realize that's a popular resort these days but I see no reason to go there in this situation. Rogers deceived. Brown committed fraud.
c_hawkbob wrote:I'm questioning your contention that Rogers didn't misrepresent his vaccination status to the league/team. I know Brown did.
RiverDog wrote:That wasn't apparent, but thanks for clearing that up.
Perhaps this will answer your question. From PFT:
Brown misrepresented his status to the Buccaneers and, in turn, the NFL. In contrast, the Packers and the NFL at all times knew that Rodgers was not vaccinated.”
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... he-league/
Brown misrepresented his status to the Buccaneers and, in turn, the NFL. In contrast, the Packers and the NFL at all times knew that
If you'll notice I put the person I was referring to in my initial remark in Bold, indicating that the question was about Rogers.
Nevertheless, thanks for the link, I had not seen that, and it was other than had been initially reported (even by PFT).
obiken wrote:Oh okay I get it, IF you lie to the league your doomed, if you just lie to the fans and players your fine! Kind of like telling your wife she just sucked on my weenie, but there was no sex!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests