NorthHawk wrote:Interesting article. I don't follow BB, so I didn't know about that team and the firing of its coach.
One question that comes to mind is does Jody Allen even like football or is it just another investment to her?
I don't know if anyone really knows how she looks at it, but missing the playoffs might make her ask how the record has been since the SB win.
That seems to parallel the Blazers record to a degree so who knows what's going to happen. This might be a real bumpy ride like the article said.
c_hawkbob wrote:I disagree. I think Russ stays and Pete goes is a far preferable scenario to the inverse. Pete is 70 and I honestly believe he's about done, certainly in a year or two at most. Losing a franchise QB is always worse than losing a coach.
c_hawkbob wrote:I disagree. I think Russ stays and Pete goes is a far preferable scenario to the inverse. Pete is 70 and I honestly believe he's about done, certainly in a year or two at most. Losing a franchise QB is always worse than losing a coach.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I'm ok keeping Russ and moving on from Pete. Not Russ's fault Pete and John traded away draft picks for players they don't keep or who don't improve the team as needed. All Pete and John's bad roster management has finally caught up with them and Russ can't somehow make it all work this year even though he's trying. He don't have the juice this year. We don't have enough defense and run game to help Russ enough. This situation we're in is basically down to bad roster management. Bad O-line picks year after year. Bad defensive picks while losing key defensive players. And coaching like you still have studs at RB and on on defense that can shut people down. The Db situation has been terrible and we're using throwaway CBs from other teams and our D-line is a shadow of what it was.
Hawktawk wrote:I say clean house . Carroll has lost credibility badly with his favoritism of Russ . And one more time . Russ. Isn’t. A . Franchise. QB anymore .
c_hawkbob wrote:You can say it, write it or express it any way you want, it's not going to make it any more true. There are at least 25 head coaches and owners that would jump at he chance to prove you wrong. It would be the stupidest move in NFL history to get rid of both halves of the winningest formula in team history. One or the other. Absolutely not both.
It's not the team's move, not as it applies to Russell. If he wants out, I can't see forcing him to stay. Can you?
RiverDog wrote:It's not the team's move, not as it applies to Russell. If he wants out, I can't see forcing him to stay. Can you?
c_hawkbob wrote:While he's under contract sure, and then a year or two of F-tag if it comes to that. As of now, without any tag years he's not a free agent until 2024.
If the decision is made to move on from Pete the move from management would be to fully involve Russ every step of the way including giving him an input (NOT final say) into the hiring of Pete's replacement. If that's the route we go we make it completely clear that we are doing so to address his concerns and rebuild a winner around him.
I would agree with your second paragraph ONLY if Russell is totally committed to staying with us. At this point, that's far from a certainty.
c_hawkbob wrote:You can say it, write it or express it any way you want, it's not going to make it any more true. There are at least 25 head coaches and owners that would jump at he chance to prove you wrong. It would be the stupidest move in NFL history to get rid of both halves of the winningest formula in team history. One or the other. Absolutely not both.
I would agree with your second paragraph ONLY if Russell is totally committed to staying with us. At this point, that's far from a certainty.
obiken wrote:Would you trade Carr for RW?
Hawktawk wrote:Ok Bob . Assuming you’re right who are these 25 GMs? As I look around the league and watch 2 straight up
Athletically unremarkable backups outplay Russ by miles as we average 7 points a game . Yeah it was the winningest formula in team history by miles but that was in 2013 and 2014. Since then we might as well have had Holmgren and Matt and SA cause that’s what they were too. A first round one and done popcorn fart after XL with a few wild card wins that fell off a cliff after years of upper middle class mediocrity . I’ve been around long enough to remember you defending those guys when they faded as a great fan does. I truly pull for Russ for his sake and for Seattle . I just have been watching a long time and I don’t think we’re ever going to see premium Russ again . Too much wrong with the body and even more in the brain . I hope you’re right and it’s all a blip because maybe I can watch a couple wins and an offense that can move the ball.
c_hawkbob wrote:Sorry but I think Joe Burrow, Trevor Lawrence and Cousins (are you kidding?) at least are no brainers. And even GB and TB in the very near future if not now. I don't care how superhuman Brady seems, it just can't go on indefinitely.
RiverDog wrote:Sorry but I think Joe Burrow, Trevor Lawrence and Cousins (are you kidding?) at least are no brainers. And even GB and TB in the very near future if not now. I don't care how superhuman Brady seems, it just
OK, I might be talked into putting Cousins into the Maybe category with Prescott and Carr simply due to his age. But Cousins has been playing very well, has only thrown 3 picks all year and has the Vikings in the middle of the playoff hunt. I wouldn't trade him for Russell and certainly not the way Russ has been playing and when there's a question mark about his health, but that's just me.
But if the GM of the Bengals, with his team currently sitting on the #6 seed and just one game out of the division lead with 6 games to go, were to trade Joe Burrow, one year displaced from the #1 overall selection and that has been playing well enough to be ranked 7th in the league, or the Jags, currently rebuilding around last year's #1 overall that has yet to play a full season, if either of them were to give up on their #1 overall QB's for a 33 year old QB with a damaged finger on his throwing hand that hasn't played consistently well for over a year, you'd have to have your head examined.
And I made the assumption that we were talking about a possible trade of Russell before the next draft, not 2 or 3 years from now, which is why I listed TB and GB. Plus I was being very generous in not including Prescott in the no brainer category, as he's 5 years younger, healthier, and has been playing a couple levels above Russell, who quite frankly, has been stinking up the place.
Hawktawk wrote:I just went to the stats to see what all these lousy QBs that teams can't wait to get rid of and bring in little superman are playing like.
Carr 3400 yards 17 TD and 9 picks and a nice looking game on thanksgiving knocking off Dallas despite losing his mentor-coach and his top wideout in an unspeakable act of stupidity.
Did someone say Dak?![]()
Twice the man right now.
Stafford who the Rams would leap to trade for a guy they OWN EVERY TIME it seems? 27 TDs and 9 picks , 3400 yards.
Cousins??????????????![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
34 TDs 3 picks and he hung up 34 points vs the Pack one week after Russ pitched a goose egg
![]()
. He owns the NFL record for completion % in a single season, well over 70%. Id take that guy pronto. Think of the hardware he might have if he didn't face A rod twice a year.
Burrows is 22 and 12 and a cocky brash young kid on a competitive team that's won several divisional games. The kind of guy I want next. Lawrence? As you say RD Meyer might as well get ready for unemployment if you drafted this generational talent Lawrence and kick him loose now. Its a fantasy. Whether hes a bust or not hes going nowhere for 3 years. Meyer will be gone first if he doesn't look like a generational talent pretty soon.
Winston has 14 TDs and 3 picks by the way. Tasem hill will start this weekend. Tua is 14 and 6 in part time duty and completing 70 % of his passes PLAYING ON A BROKEN FINGER IN HIS THROWING HAND. Some of the rest? Sure they need a QB but do they break the bank for what were seeing here?
RD you kind make my point when you point out he's 33 with a bad finger and hasn't played really well for a year "stinking up the place". The last 4 games he's started he's throw 2 TD passes and 4 picks if you count the failed 2 point that was absolutely botched by Russel's indecision and paralysis on the play despite several" nfl open "guys. Its what we see in the key moments now, the must have plays, the third downs. I've seen enough to make up my mind. Should he come out and go off for 400 and 4 TDs like good Russ Ill eat the crow gladly.
I think the chariot turned to a pumpkin. It was always too good to be true, Russ was. It was awesome but now its gone.
Yeah, but if I read your comments right (they were a little jumbled up), you had just two GM's that would trade their starting QB for Russell. Which of the following is it that you don't think would swap their current QB for Russell, keeping in mind that you have to eliminate all but two: Lions, Panthers, Texans, Steelers, Jets, Dolphins, Bears, Broncos, WTF, and Giants? And that's giving you the questionable ones, like the Rams, where Stafford has face planted big time in the past 3 games, the Colts and Wentz, and the Titans and Tannehill. I could absolutely see a lot more than two of those teams rolling the dice on a QB that is an 8-time Pro Bowler.
I agree with you that 25 is over the top, but saying that there's just 2 out of the 31 other GM's that would swap their QB for Russell is going to get you demoted into the hater category.
NorthHawk wrote:A real list would have to take into account what teams Wilson would really go to. His list last year only included teams with an Offensive HC, and I doubt that criteria would change after this year.
Hawktawk wrote:I would. Yes .
Hawktawk wrote:Rd not sure the math . I’d say Tampa,9ers , Rams , Zona, Tenessee ? Vikes , KC, chargers , bills , jets, Bears , Bengals , ravens , Miami , Indy , eagles , maybe the skins the way Heinike has played last 4 all wins . Nobody is going away from those starters IMO. Add Jax due to who they drafted , basically the same as the jets. That’s 18 places I can’t see going after Wilson unless he’s not stinking up the joint and being petulant to boot
Hawktawk wrote:18 places leaves you 11 short of the 2 places you said were the only ones you could see doing a swap. It was a preposterous statement that you should just correct and move on.
RiverDog wrote:18 places leaves you 11 short of the 2 places you said were the only ones you could see doing a swap. It was a preposterous statement that you should just correct and move on.
Hawktalk wrote:You need a reading comprehension review.
I said" as I look around the league I see 2 athletically unremarkable backups outplay Russ by miles as we average 7 points per game". That would have been Colt McCoy and Taylor Heineken who completely outplayed a future HOF in a must win game, one at home. I named 18 teams with no interest IMO and I did so based on what they have and what Russ appears to have left. Honestly I have no idea who might bite with guys like Dalton , Tyrod Taylor, Ryan Fitzpatrick still drawing a paycheck. Hell Rosins got a job . But the preposterous position is thinking any of this no trade clause stuff is relevant and who will be interested or should we keep him is the point right now. Point is he SUCKS and will help nobody including us but rather the opposite as weve seen unless he becomes someone he hasn't been in about a calendar year now. 10 year vets that suddenly cant read the field have been hit too much. Other than Kurt Warner I've never seen too many who can come back from it.
It was beautiful. Thanks for the memories. I've seen enough to believe we are gonna suck and hear a lot of happy talk at press conferences till they pull the ripcord on this entire shebang.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Damn. Some people turn on Russ very easily. One down year after his first serious injury and some of the fan base ready to toss Russ out. And you wonder why these athletes want to leave or switch teams easily when the fan base can just turn on them at the drop of a hat and want to get rid of them with no thought to all they've done for the franchise. There is no loyalty amongst fans, no idea why fans expect athletes to remain with a team for less money or show any loyalty given how fast a fan base will turn on them during a down period.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Damn. Some people turn on Russ very easily. One down year after his first serious injury and some of the fan base ready to toss Russ out. And you wonder why these athletes want to leave or switch teams easily when the fan base can just turn on them at the drop of a hat and want to get rid of them with no thought to all they've done for the franchise. There is no loyalty amongst fans, no idea why fans expect athletes to remain with a team for less money or show any loyalty given how fast a fan base will turn on them during a down period.
Hawktawk wrote:I’m a fan of the team first and any individual player second . I’ve loved the Russ Wilson era . But IMO it’s over in terms of a winning formula here . We’ve won 1 playoff game since the 2016 season . Russ has become more and more commercial, more about self every year. Last offseason was the culmination with the petulant whining about getting hit and leaking teams he’d go to . On the heels of his DREADFUL playoff loss no less . His play had been sub par much of the second half of 20 which has nothing to do with the injury . Now 2021 . He was terribly inconsistent before the injury . His last win was against our next opponent and he had 5 straight 3 and outs in that game too. Love Russ . He’s done . This is never going to get much better . I’d rather see him go elsewhere than watch him totally melt down here . For his legacy . For my sanity and most of all for my team . It’s time to cut the cord on the era .
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests