RiverDog wrote:Glad that's out of the way. Now to the more important of the two: Duane Brown.
c_hawkbob wrote:Not to say I told you so but ...
c_hawkbob wrote:Thanks 86 and yeah, I don't care what his position is, he's a force on the field that the other team has to account for every single play, and next to Bobby, clearly the best player on our defense. Everyone likes to say his coverage skills are sub par but the man lives in the other teams backfield whether it's a passing down or a running down, besides his sacks his tackles for loss and QB hits are outrageous. You can't watch a game he's playing in and not see him as the major disruptor on the field. He may not be the best cover safety in the league, but the rest of his game more than makes up for it.
obiken wrote:I agree Bob, but I have serious doubts that he can stay healthy, look at Clowney.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:That's an interesting point, Asea, especially if Diggs is perceived to out-perform Adams. May not be able to keep him if that is the case.
RiverDog wrote:Let's cross that bridge when we come to it. For now, Adams is in the fold at the contract price we stated was our final offer and we've staved off the Grim Reaper for a time. Next on the pallet has to be getting Duane Brown on board.
I'll hope for the best. But in my opinion, this defense works best with an Earl-type safety. That guy who can cover the back end and back up the corners. So far Jamal Adams isn't that guy. I hope he can improve in coverage because in this league passing is king.
RiverDog wrote:Let's cross that bridge when we come to it. For now, Adams is in the fold at the contract price we stated was our final offer and we've staved off the Grim Reaper for a time. Next on the pallet has to be getting Duane Brown on board.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I'll hope for the best. But in my opinion, this defense works best with an Earl-type safety. That guy who can cover the back end and back up the corners. So far Jamal Adams isn't that guy. I hope he can improve in coverage because in this league passing is king.
NorthHawk wrote:People seem to be stuck on Adams role to be like ET was. They are two different types of players and I think Adams will be given a lot more freedom than many of us expect.
I get that take just from how Pete talked about Adams immediately after the trade, but it's just the impression I got at the time, so who knows. It might be he's in more of a
hybrid model between ET's role and a Rover type depending on the Defense that's called. Probably more blitzing or threatening to blitz than ET ever did but a lot less than last year.
I'm starting to feel if Russ is playing for us in 2023 I will be shocked.
obiken wrote:Okay here's my problem. We live and die on RW making plays, RW comes out and says he needs help on the OLine what does he get? Nothing. Then he goes full tilt for Brown, and we sign JA, what happens next year when Metcalf comes due. Its like PC doesnt care what Russ really thinks, but pretends to. I'm starting to feel if Russ is playing for us in 2023 I will be shocked.
obiken wrote:Okay here's my problem. We live and die on RW making plays, RW comes out and says he needs help on the OLine what does he get? Nothing. Then he goes full tilt for Brown, and we sign JA, what happens next year when Metcalf comes due. Its like PC doesnt care what Russ really thinks, but pretends to. I'm starting to feel if Russ is playing for us in 2023 I will be shocked.
NorthHawk wrote:Pete's Defense changed last year with all the blitzing including Wagner the last few years, so he's not necessarily stuck to one formula. As well, he has changed his tune on the size of the Corners and even drafted Tre Brown,
who doesn't meet that physical requirement of 5 -10 years ago. However he's always loved a dynamic Safety who can do many things and that's what Adams gives the Defense.
He may play closer to the line and last year might be a blessing because now even if he's not blitzing, the Offenses will have to account for him in case he does. It changes their game plan and can give our Defense an edge.
obiken wrote:Okay here's my problem. We live and die on RW making plays, RW comes out and says he needs help on the OLine what does he get? Nothing. Then he goes full tilt for Brown, and we sign JA, what happens next year when Metcalf comes due. Its like PC doesnt care what Russ really thinks, but pretends to. I'm starting to feel if Russ is playing for us in 2023 I will be shocked.
The structure of these defenses have held up all these years because they work the way they work very well. And pass rushing safety who lines up a 100 times on the line is not part of either defense for very good reasons
NorthHawk wrote:We also have changed to using more nickel and dime formations. A few years ago almost 75% of the defensive formations had only 2 LBs.
This along with changing physical characteristics of DBs tells us Pete isn’t locked in on one defensive scheme or player type even if the “base
defense” is a 4-3 under.
I’ve never said I expect Adams to be a continuous or primary pass rusher this year, but I can see him being moving up to the LOS as to
force the Offenses to change their play or blocking assignments. I can also see him being more of a “rover” type of safety where the QB has to take into account his whereabouts. I don’t think he’s going to be a traditional Safety much like Pete used Palomalu (sp) at USC.
c_hawkbob wrote:This is not a cookie cutter defense. Pete looks for unusual skill sets and figures out how to incorporate them into his defense and make it work with the people he's got. We didn't replace Brandon Browner with another SS looking Corner that hit like a LB, we didn't replace Earl with another Earl (couldn't, there ain't another Earl), or Kam with another Kam. He'll use Jamal in a way that best utilizes his specific unique skill set and it won't look like any other defense he's had because Jamal is not like any other player he's had. I know there was a popular article specifying how Pete needed such and such and so and so kind of players to be successful, but the dude was wrong. Bad bandwagon to jump on.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:It's also hard to compete in the playoffs when you telegraph a WR screen for a pick 6 and then proceed to do nothing offensively the rest of the game. Yeah, the oline has issues, but he didn't come through in the clutch. Maybe that's offensive play calling, maybe it's Russ not willing to take shorter completions, but the offense had multiple opportunities to get back in the game and didn't, and Wilson's stat line was awful, even more so by taking off that garbage time td to Metcalf. The offense has plenty of blame to take in not being prepared to play in the playoffs.
Just as the defense, namely the LOB, had to bail out the O for wins sometimes, the offensive has to do it too, and Wilson has some serious playmakers to do that with. The defense does need to be in the top half of the league, for sure, but there's no excuse for looking that badly in the most important game of the season.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:It's also hard to compete in the playoffs when you telegraph a WR screen for a pick 6 and then proceed to do nothing offensively the rest of the game. Yeah, the oline has issues, but he didn't come through in the clutch. Maybe that's offensive play calling, maybe it's Russ not willing to take shorter completions, but the offense had multiple opportunities to get back in the game and didn't, and Wilson's stat line was awful, even more so by taking off that garbage time td to Metcalf. The offense has plenty of blame to take in not being prepared to play in the playoffs.
Just as the defense, namely the LOB, had to bail out the O for wins sometimes, the offensive has to do it too, and Wilson has some serious playmakers to do that with. The defense does need to be in the top half of the league, for sure, but there's no excuse for looking that badly in the most important game of the season.
Users browsing this forum: NorthHawk and 53 guests