NorthHawk wrote:Realistically they can't keep Jamal Adams and sign Jones as Adams will demand around $18M, so that would be around $33M for 2 players. We can't extend Wilson because the Cap hit would be around $45M
for him next year. Add in Wagner and it's approaching $100M for 4 players. They can be creative with the contracts to mitigate the Cap hit, but the only player not getting on in years is Adams.
Extending contracts for Jones would mean spending Cap money after he's retired. So, if they sign him it would probably mean they are going all in now and then have to blow it all up in a few years
when the Cap hit is too large. One other thought is maybe they are betting that with the gambling revenue, the future Cap will expand by a huge number and it won't be such a big deal. They may be
right, but it's a high risk strategy.
Old but Slow wrote:No, no, no to Julio. We have greater needs elsewhere.
Sign Adams or trade him. The team cannot afford to allow him to play out his contract with nothing in return. I have never figured out the why of the trade, as safety is not an area of drastic need, and we need help in the trenches. Get us a DT and/or a center. Adams is a great talent and is in some ways unique, as is Julio Jones, but the team is too close to being complete to waste resources on big names.
I agree with you about Julio Jones. I can't imagine our front office being a serious suitor.
As far as Adams goes, I do not think it outrageous to pay him in the neighborhood of $15-$18M. He's not a typical safety, more of a hybrid DB/LB or something. He's the best defensive player on our team, the type of player teams have to game plan for, reminds me a lot of Kenny Easley. I don't think we're trading him as I can't imagine giving up the draft capital we did if we didn't have some type of unwritten understanding with him about a long term contract.
I agree with you about Julio Jones. I can't imagine our front office being a serious suitor.
As far as Adams goes, I do not think it outrageous to pay him in the neighborhood of $15-$18M. He's not a typical safety, more of a hybrid DB/LB or something. He's the best defensive player on our team, the type of player teams have to game plan for, reminds me a lot of Kenny Easley. I don't think we're trading him as I can't imagine giving up the draft capital we did if we didn't have some type of unwritten understanding with him about a long term contract.
obiken wrote:Fine but he cannot stay healthy River, I think paying that kind of money for any Defensive player is a mistake. IF we had given up only one pick for JA, I believe we would have Jones right now. RW has been texting him. I agree kinda on Jones, Jones at 32 is not the Jones of 5 years ago.
obiken wrote:RW has been texting him (Julio Jones).
NorthHawk wrote:He also talked about getting more superstars, so it's not out of step with his statements. It's just that the OL part was blown up more than the other statements.
NorthHawk wrote:He wants it all. Just like most of us.
So in other words, since it's unrealistic to have it all, Russell was fantasizing when he texted Julio Jones about playing with him. Is that your take?
NorthHawk wrote:According to PFT, we are now the favorites to land Jones,
I think it would be a mistake, unless they coul re-sign Wilson to a long term deal with extra voidable
years and lower his Cap hit. Barring that it would put us in a long term hole by signing him.
NorthHawk wrote:According to PFT, we are now the favorites to land Jones, I think it would be a mistake, unless they could re-sign Wilson to a long term deal with extra voidable years and lower his Cap hit. Barring that it would put us in a long term hole by signing him.
c_hawkbob wrote:Why would Florio be interested in stroking Russ' ego? He never misses an opportunity to talk sh!t about him.
c_hawkbob wrote:Why would Florio be interested in stroking Russ' ego? He never misses an opportunity to talk sh!t about him.
RiverDog wrote:I wasn't referring to Florio. I was referring to Pete and John.
Seattle should be regarded as a longshot.
If it’s true that they’ve talked to the Falcons about a trade for Jones, the Seahawks quite possibly did so simply to placate quarterback Russell Wilson, who presumably would like to add Jones to the offense.
NorthHawk wrote:Jones has only played a full season 4 times in 10 years and last year only played 9 games due to injury.
I think at 32 he's on the downside of his career and at the point where injuries will play a larger role in his career than game time or production.
Maybe he does have 2 good years left, but the odds are against him.
govandals wrote:I was on the fence about this for a few days, but PCJS could spend the 15 mil in other ways and make this team better than by adding Julio Jones. Brock Huard on the radio the other day insinuated Jones' best days are behind him, said there was a lot of work involved to get him ready on gameday. Bad hamstrings.
Honestly, I'm not only excited for Eskridge, but also Cade Johnson and Tamorrion Terry. Both of those guys had draftable grades. (I mean, really, who needs a future HOFer taking away snaps from UDFAs anyway, lol)
Biggest needs IMO:
3 tech with some wiggle. Sheldon Richardson or Geno Atkins would be nice.
A LEGIT outside corner.
Competition at center.
I can't see 15 mil....you run the risk of pissing of Lockett and Metcalf, and they are much more important to the future of the Hawks. And I too am looking forward to seeing some of these younger guys.
c_hawkbob wrote:Well I do think DK is roughly half Julio at his best but you're right, he really does need to work on his focus.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests