c_hawkbob wrote:And frankly Sis I'm less concerned now than I was before last night's game, now they've tasted their own blood so to speak and shown the mettle to hold their own in a slugfest and keep on swinging! Before they hadn't been tested all year, now they know what they're capable of when the going get's tough.
Hawk Sista wrote:Well, SHI+!
Hawk Sista wrote:The Zags were out matched, plain and simple. Not because they were tired, not because of the emotional game on Saturday against the Bruins, but because that Baylor squad is legit! The Zags came out flat, but it wasn’t just that; sadly, the better team won. The Bears were the best team in college basketball this year, clearly. It was heartbreaking to see it play out as I feared it would. It was not even close. Still, congratulations to the Zags on a great season!! There is no shame on them from me.
trents wrote:Seems like baskeball, whether college or pro, has turned into mostly a three point shooting contest. If they're falling for you and not the other team then you'll likely bury them. Makes for just too much floor space for a defense to cover.
trents wrote:The other thing that makes it a nightmare for defenses is that so many bigs now are proficient outside shooters and passers. If your big comes out to the perimeter to defend their big they just run a quick guard into the post and shoot a pass to him for a quick bucket.
Hawktawk wrote:Yes it was a great year . Yes the zags did become the first team since 79 to reach the title game unbeaten . Still the game wasn’t as close as the score and was miles further apart from the talent level . The zags beat both the teams that beat Baylor this year . They had 3 wooden watch candidates on the floor at the same time , a top pick at point . They had the most fundamentally sound back to the basket big in college this year . They had the coach of the year .
My zags choked . They came out flat and got stomped on . They had no fight , unforced errors , no answers . Could not shoot or defend the three . Not blocking out from the first shot . They choked . # 1 ranked all year and already ranked # 1 for next year . Talent was not the difference . Blame UCLA all you want . It was close because the zags were already letting down . It was tied at the end of OT because Kispert didn’t block out .
It’s time to win it all or no more excuses .
I was pretty disappointed in Kispert's play, too. His 3 point shooting seemed like it was off during the tourney.
But I'm not going to characterize their performance as a 'choke'. IMO choking is failing in a critical, singular moment, like Scott Norwood missing a game winning FG in the Super Bowl. The Zags didn't get close enough to choke. For whatever reason, the Zags were not ready to play.
And let's not take anything away from Baylor. They played their absolute best in both Final Four games, blowing out a very good Houston team in addition to handing the Zags their only loss of the season. They deserved every ounce of that championship trophy.
obiken wrote:The number one and two teams in the country all year, played for the title. Sure Zags were tired and a little off, but like Sister said, Baylor was just stronger, faster, bigger, higher, etc. IF they played 7 games like the NBA, Baylor would have won in 6, max.
Hawk Sista wrote:The way both teams were playing come tournament time, I’d say the Zags would win about 20-30% of the time. Sorry, that’s how I see it. The thing that makes it tough is that they do have the best coach and are likely the second best team we have seen in many years. It just so happens to be at the same when Baylor was better.
c_hawkbob wrote:Beat down in one game doesn't at all mean that it would be a beat down every time. If you believe that you haven't watched enough 7 game series. I do believe Baylor would have won the series but I don't believe this single game can be considered a fair indication of the relative strength of the two teams. Some games just get away from you.
c_hawkbob wrote:Beat down in one game doesn't at all mean that it would be a beat down every time. If you believe that you haven't watched enough 7 game series. I do believe Baylor would have won the series but I don't believe this single game can be considered a fair indication of the relative strength of the two teams. Some games just get away from you.
govandals wrote:Baylor's offensive rebounding and 3 pt percentage would be hard to replicate again.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests