mykc14 wrote:Worst loss of the PC era...
RiverDog wrote:Not sure about that, but it was ugly.
TriCitySam wrote:RW has had more bad performances than good ones this year. I know he’s focused on “being the best of all time”, but instead of visualization maybe he needs to concentrate on execution.
obiken wrote:Its over, period.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Russ has fallen off a cliff and it's hard to tell why. Why would he go from being on fire to garbage? Hard to explain. What are they doing differently now?
Aseahawkfan wrote:Russ has fallen off a cliff and it's hard to tell why. Why would he go from being on fire to garbage? Hard to explain. What are they doing differently now?
Not sure about that, but it was ugly.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Russ has fallen off a cliff and it's hard to tell why. Why would he go from being on fire to garbage? Hard to explain. What are they doing differently now?
obiken wrote:Its over, period.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Russ has fallen off a cliff and it's hard to tell why. Why would he go from being on fire to garbage? Hard to explain. What are they doing differently now?
RiverDog wrote:This has been a whacky year, with no preseason and no crowds. Perhaps with Russell, being as experienced as he is and with mostly familiar faces at WR and TE, had an advantage over defenses. League wide, offenses ran wild in the first half of the season, but they seem to have come back to Earth here lately.
RiverDog wrote:Just some random thoughts.
One of the things that sticks out is our 0-2 on 4th down. It's easy to blame the play call but it's becoming all too frequent of a habit that we fail so often in short yardage situations.
Also, Carlos Hyde didn't look right yesterday. Does he have an injury issue?
Do we miss Greg Olsen more than we realize?
Iupati seems to be getting beat a lot.
obiken wrote:HT, It’s pretty hard not to suck, when you’re running for your life and your sacked five times. We had no running game and our offensive line couldn’t stop their front four. No question this was a trap game, the Giants are a darn good football team on the rise. Imagine if they would’ve had Barkley? No question I and everybody else, might’ve made too much out of this game, but the offensive line is our major weakness. Maybe this is our new normal with Russell making 30+ million a year, I hope not!
obiken wrote:HT, It’s pretty hard not to suck, when you’re running for your life and your sacked five times. We had no running game and our offensive line couldn’t stop their front four. No question this was a trap game, the Giants are a darn good football team on the rise. Imagine if they would’ve had Barkley? No question I and everybody else, might’ve made too much out of this game, but the offensive line is our major weakness. Maybe this is our new normal with Russell making 30+ million a year, I hope not!
obiken wrote:HT, It’s pretty hard not to suck, when you’re running for your life and your sacked five times. We had no running game and our offensive line couldn’t stop their front four. No question this was a trap game, the Giants are a darn good football team on the rise. Imagine if they would’ve had Barkley? No question I and everybody else, might’ve made too much out of this game, but the offensive line is our major weakness. Maybe this is our new normal with Russell making 30+ million a year, I hope not!
Aseahawkfan wrote:As far as I'm concerned our chances for a Super Bowl are over. When you can't beat the teams when you need to beat them during the regular season, you're unlikely to do so in the playoffs. This team has too many exploitable holes in it. I can't see us beating more complete teams. Until Pete gets this defense rebuilt while maintaining the offense, I don't see Pete Ball winning any more Super Bowls.
RiverDog wrote:
But the offense has just sucked, and it's difficult to explain. That was not a top 10 defense we were playing Sunday.
RiverDog wrote:The defense isn't playing that badly here lately. Over the past 4 games, we've held our opponents to an average of less than 20 points per game. That's good enough to win most NFL games. It was the turnaround we needed to compete for a SB.
But the offense has just sucked, and it's difficult to explain. That was not a top 10 defense we were playing Sunday.
RiverDog wrote:The defense isn't playing that badly here lately. Over the past 4 games, we've held our opponents to an average of less than 20 points per game. That's good enough to win most NFL games. It was the turnaround we needed to compete for a SB.
But the offense has just sucked, and it's difficult to explain. That was not a top 10 defense we were playing Sunday.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I feel for Pete Ball to work you need a top 10 defense. Pete Ball is a play action ball control offense that eats clock with a premium on protecting from turnovers, scores at a relatively slow pace, and forces the opponent to score slowly while the defense gets turnovers. That only works if the defense is at least a top 10 defense. If the defense can't slow down high powered offenses and stop them from scoring more often than we do, then you don't win Super Bowls. Our defense isn't up to snuff at the moment and it's just worse now that the offense is playing protect the ball more than they want to score.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests