jshawaii22 wrote:sorry about stepping on your post -- i didn't look before hitting go. --
TriCitySam wrote:Given that college FB could be moved to spring, hard to guess how valuable the ‘21 draft pick is.
RiverDog wrote:I think that TC Sam hit on something when he noted how much of a cluster next spring's draft is likely to be. The Pac 12 and Big 10 have already canceled all non conference games and several FCS leagues, the Ivy League and Patriot League, have canceled or postponed their seasons. With the coronavirus raging in CFB hotbeds like Florida and Texas and showing signs of getting worse in states like Alabama and Georgia, CFB might be forced to at least postpone their seasons, and if they do cancel their season, a lot of players will will gain a year of eligibility.
Next spring's draft could be a real mess, which would devalue any draft pick. This is likely one of the factors that gave Pete and John the motivation to trade draft picks.
RiverDog wrote:I think that TC Sam hit on something when he noted how much of a cluster next spring's draft is likely to be. The Pac 12 and Big 10 have already canceled all non conference games and several FCS leagues, the Ivy League and Patriot League, have canceled or postponed their seasons. With the coronavirus raging in CFB hotbeds like Florida and Texas and showing signs of getting worse in states like Alabama and Georgia, CFB might be forced to at least postpone their seasons, and if they do cancel their season, a lot of players will will gain a year of eligibility.
Next spring's draft could be a real mess, which would devalue any draft pick. This is likely one of the factors that gave Pete and John the motivation to trade draft picks.
c_hawkbob wrote:Besides Earl, what two (or even three) Pete Carroll 1st round draft choices would you not trade for Jamal Adams?
RiverDog wrote:But by the same token, we haven't had that great of a record of first round trades producing, either. Percy Harvin and Jimmy Graham come to mind. And we're not just talking about one first round pick, we're talking about two of them. That kind of capital could have moved us up into the top 10 in a given draft where we've had just one pick in Pete's 11 seasons.
Being that Adams is a defensive player and that Pete has such a good eye for those that fit his system, I'm a little more optimistic than I would be if it were an offensive player we were betting the house on. But make no mistake: This is a huge gamble. Adams has to produce.
RiverDog wrote:But by the same token, we haven't had that great of a record of first round trades producing, either. Percy Harvin and Jimmy Graham come to mind. And we're not just talking about one first round pick, we're talking about two of them. That kind of capital could have moved us up into the top 10 in a given draft where we've had just one pick in Pete's 11 seasons.
Being that Adams is a defensive player and that Pete has such a good eye for those that fit his system, I'm a little more optimistic than I would be if it were an offensive player we were betting the house on. But make no mistake: This is a huge gamble. Adams has to produce.
c_hawkbob wrote:Harvin helped us win a SB and Graham was the best TE we ever had, if that's failure, I'll take it.
RiverDog wrote:A lot of players helped us win that SB. You said yourself that our win was so dominating that the absence of any one of them would not have changed the outcome. Harvin played one game in the 2013 regular season and outside of the SB, none in the playoffs. His contributions to that ring rank way, way down the ladder, not to mention that he nearly blew up the team by getting into fights with teammates and disobeying his coaches. It was one of, if not the worst trade in our history.
And unless you're basing your appraisal of Graham on stats alone, I disagree with your assessment of him being the best TE in our history. Even considering his injury history, I'd take Zach Miller over Graham every day of the week and twice on Sundays.
This trade has to produce.
I'd take Zach Miller too. He was perfect for our offense. Jimmy G was a successful trade and Jimmy G performed the way he was supposed to perform as a pass catcher and TD producer. He didn't have that Seahawks toughness we like. Jamal Adams has that toughness.
And Harvin was just crazy. Not crazy in that good Marshawn Lynch way, but selfish crazy. He felt like his talent allowed him to do whatever he wants to do, but even amazing talent mixed with selfish crazy eventually makes the cost not worth it. Harvin was ever bit the talent Pete was looking for, but in a fragile package mentally and physically. Too bad. If Harvin could have performed, he would probably be a Hall of Famer with that insane speed and talent.
obiken wrote:Yeah with all due respect to you and Cbob, we gave up an All-Pro Center for JG Sorry, we got took. The best TE we ever had? Charlie Young. This is a hard trade to argue against, but its equally as hard to argue for. How many Dion Branch type trades like this ever panned out for us. Course Bob made the best argument, we are talking PC drafts here, not Normal drafting!
I am never quite sure what you're talking about with the draft. Do you have some kind of actual examples of teams drafting better than Pete and John late in the draft? We've picked an average of 23 for like 8 years because the team has been successful.
We've gotten some studs in the draft. Tyler Lockett is damn good. D.K. Metcalf looks pretty awesome. Frank Clark was good before we traded him. Our running game did start to get going before Carson and Penney got hurt. They did draft and trade for the best Seahawks defense of all time bar none. And our best QB in history and our first Hall of Fame QB. I don't know what to tell you. We all wish we had more Super Bowls, but as far as teams go this is the best we've ever had with more playoff appearances than any Seahawks team in history.
If you think Pete and John are doing a bad job, you must have really despised Holmgren and Knox and their GMs.
obiken wrote:ASHF,
Its not the over all drafts I have a problem with, but we usually punt on the 1st round anyway. We have wiffed on people like Carpenter, passed on Fletcher Cox, taken Ifetti, and Paul Richardson. Holmy was good at 2nd rounders like Lofta, Hamlin, and Boulware, he had was horrible at 1st rounders with a few exceptions. But yeah ask these guys, I used to Flip out every Holmy draft. I tried to tell my best friend in Cleveland that Holmy was a really good coach, but a horrible drafter. 3 years later he came around.
Well, I know you're a huge Seahawks fan and want them to be a as perfect as possible. I get the frustration. Sucks when trades don't work out ]or you end up with a Carpenter or Malik McDowell. And that second Super Bowl loss is rotten, one bad decision by a coach ruined it all. We had checkmate given our players and personnel and someone decided to get cute. It will always kill me no matter how many people argue it was a good move.
As mad as I get about that like you get mad about the draft, overall team management for a decade has made us a perennial contender where our fans expect us to make the playoffs and compete for the division on a yearly basis. Our offense is looking better at WR than we have in years. If Pete can get the defense rebuilt, we'll be contending strongly again rather than just getting into the playoffs. I hope this Adams trade works out and some of these secondary picks work out. This all pro safety Adams is the best building block we've had to rebuild the secondary in years. Now we just gotta hope the D-line improves, especially in stuffing the run and the new LB can strengthen the overall corps.
obiken wrote:I agree ASSY it beats the previous years no doubt. No question JA is a 24 year old great talent, its just the price that makes me cringe. We got Beast for 4 and a 5th rounder, man this guy goes south and we are just hosed. Outside of RW there is no on the Hawks I would not trade for 2 1st and a 3rd.
Not every trade has to be a fire sale. To use a poker analogy, you're going to lose more often than you win if all you do is bet on a sure hand and fold anytime someone raises you. I'm OK with Pete and John making this kind of a deal and trust that they know what they're doing. But I still reserve my right to b**** about it if it fizzles.
obiken wrote:Riv, I have to agree with the Herd, that this trade smacks of desperation. Your getting a Box Safety, not a position we need to cover for: a Starter, 2-First and a 3rd. No question he makes plays, but he is not Mack, Watt, or Reggie White who can take over a game. PC and JS look like they are covering their butts for declining Offensive and Defensive Lines. No doubt you dont find all world play makers drafting 23 or 24th every year, but finding good O and D lineman should not have been that hard. Now with Womack opting out, once again RW runs for his life, but that is what he does best till.....................wham o! We won 11 games by a score or less, good luck repeating that this year. IF we have a this year. I am not jumping on the trade trade or jumping on board. No, I would not have done it, but I think the Jets were desperate, and they got a haul. Why?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests