obiken wrote:I give the whole draft a B, I am probably being generous, but I am getting old. I have lost faith in PC to draft Offensive talent, not without good reason.
NorthHawk wrote:I don't have an issue with who they took as much as those they passed over. In years past when we drafted Wagner and Wilson, we were panned as having the worst draft but ended up with All Pros and Pro Bowl players. So these things in the media don't bother me at all.
NorthHawk wrote:I don't have an issue with who they took as much as those they passed over.
In years past when we drafted Wagner and Wilson, we were panned as having the worst draft but ended up with All Pros and Pro Bowl players.
So these things in the media don't bother me at all.
That being said, we passed over some game changing talent at WR and RB early on for Brooks. He may be a very solid player and possibly
a Pro Bowl LB at some point, but when was the last time we spent a high pick on a top tier RB? Penny was a 1st round pick, but he was not
top tier. Michael was a high pick, but again, not top tier. I think the last time we did select one of the top RBs was Alexander in the Holmgren
years. Which is odd considering the Offense and identity the FO built and wants to get back to.
obiken wrote:Pete gets guys on defense that buy into all his Tony Robins slogans, and they play above themselves. After 3 years the same old slogans start to run thin.
obiken wrote:I give the whole draft a B, I am probably being generous, but I am getting old. I have lost faith in PC to draft Offensive talent, not without good reason.
obiken wrote:Pete gets guys on defense that buy into all his Tony Robins slogans, and they play above themselves. After 3 years the same old slogans start to run thin.
Every coach including Belichick does things the same way year in and year out. The Patriot Way has been The Patriot Way since the early 2000s. Not sure why you think any professional football player starts to tune out. If you're at the professional level, you can't afford to let motivation run thin. It will cost you your career and the money along with it.
jshawaii22 wrote:Being a "professional" doesn't change the fact that human emotions come into play far more often that it should. The turning point of this team was one bad play call, or one great defensive play call by Belichick. But that's where it all came apart for the team, Professional or not. The vocal leaders of the team tuned out and never tuned back in.
I agree, and I remember saying at the time it happened that the challenge of bringing a team back after an emotionally devastating loss like SB49 was going to be greater than building the team virtually from scratch into Super Bowl champions. In retrospect, it would have been better had we lost by 3 TD's.
obiken wrote:Right! Because its easier to write of a blow out loss mentally, than just give the ball to Lynch! My issue River wasn't the call, it was calling a slant pass with a 5-11 QB! A roll out right or Left and a sack, I could have handled a lot better.
trents wrote:The knock on Colby Parkinson is his lack of physicality. Draft analysis was that he struggled in run blocking and has "thin limbs". If we can get a year or two out of Greg Olsen and put some meat on Parkinson's bones during that time he might prove to be a good catch.
NorthHawk wrote:I wonder if the selecting 2 TE's means anything other than competition? Maybe they want to go to more 2 TE sets and short passes to take some pressure off of the run game.
Is Dissly having problems recovering? Olsen should be a good mentor for these guys for the time he is here.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests