Uppercut wrote:I am having doubts about the effectiveness of JS to identify talent in the draft. I was an avid fan but lately there are more busts than success stories. Maybe they should bring on someone that knows that stuff.
Aseahawkfan wrote:I think the problem is not Schneider, but that they moved away from their original philosophy trying to trade for gold than mine for it. When John and Pete first got there, they left no stones unturned. They churned this roster and found talent like Clemons and Bennett off the radar. Now they keep trying to trade for gold that seemed to have started with Harvin onto Graham and the other line of mature folks. I think they are starting to get back to their original philosphy and if Pete can get the defense rebuilt, we can make a more serious run. So far it's looking like the run game is rebuilt. We need to add the defense and maintain what we have and we're back in it. With Brady and the Patriots looking done, it's a wide open field.
c_hawkbob wrote:Graham a bust? Best TE ever to wear Seahawk uniform ain't enough huh?
c_hawkbob wrote:Graham a bust? Best TE ever to wear Seahawk uniform ain't enough huh?
RiverDog wrote:IMO the best tight end to wear a Seahawk uniform was Zach Miller. I'd take him any day of the week and twice on Sundays vs. Graham.
'Bust' might be too a strong of a term, but he did not live up to expectations given what we gave up for him.
c_hawkbob wrote:Y'all are just up in the night on this whole thread IMO. Bo Duke is the best GM we've ever had by far ... still!
You keep saying he was good for his first few years but using DVOA stats we've drafted 6 first round talents since 2015 while only drafting in the first round 3 times.
Go ahead and tell me who's doing better (whether you're successful or not, saying Scneider has lost it is just a load of crap).
NorthHawk wrote:I don't think the problem with Graham was he was a bad fit, rather they tried to make him play outside of his abilities.
NorthHawk wrote:I don't look at it that way (being a bad fit). He could have been much more productive if they just used him as a receiving TE, but they were too stubborn to change their Offense slightly to take advantage of the skills that made him special. That
slight change could have made all the difference.
c_hawkbob wrote:Y'all are just up in the night on this whole thread IMO. Bo Duke is the best GM we've ever had by far ... still!
You keep saying he was good for his first few years but using DVOA stats we've drafted 6 first round talents since 2015 while only drafting in the first round 3 times.
Go ahead and tell me who's doing better (whether you're successful or not, saying Scneider has lost it is just a load of crap).
RiverDog wrote:I never said that JS has "lost it. To the contrary, I agree with you that Schneider is the best GM we've ever had. Don't interpret my pointing out of some of his mistakes and explanations for some of his failures as an overall displeasure with his work.
As far as comparing Graham with Miller, you can't quantify blocking like you can receiving. Graham was a horribly weak blocker, a wide receiver posing as an inline tight end. There were times that I swore that Miller was a better blocker than our tackles, and when have a run first offense like ours, a blocking tight end is a must. Plus he made some incredibly tough catches and was Russell's security blanket when protection broke down, which during that period of time, happened more times than not.
Graham was a bad fit here and we should have never traded for him. I suspect the reason we did was because we felt an almost desperate need to get Russell some "weapons" and at the time, he was the only player within our reach that fit that description.
NorthHawk wrote:I don't think he was anywhere near the best TE but it depends on how you define
what a TE is. I believe that a TE is a complete player and Graham is not. He's
simply a huge WR playing at the TE position. They should have recognized that
and used him accordingly.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests