c_hawkbob wrote:Turning him around and letting him high point the ball was the higher percentage play. It wasn't an under throw at all, it was a conscious decision. He even said after the game that he could have led him with the ball and it probably would have been 6 but all they needed was the first to win the game so he went with the higher percentage play.
RiverDog wrote:...it would appear that Russell underthrew that ball and if it were any other situation, I'd agree. But when all we needed was a first down, Russell didn't want to overthrow him, as he did ever so slightly on the TD pass to him (Metcalf), so he took a little off it. At least that's my impression on what must have been going through Russ's mind at the time.
Oly wrote:I think it's a little too early to say that Metcalf is displacing Lockett. The connection with Lockett has been historically reliable, which is what Wilson wants. As long as the Wilson-to-Lockett connection has one of the highest QB ratings in history (maybe the highest?), Lockett will be the top option.
c_hawkbob wrote:Actually yes, I misread your post to say that it was an under throw, I missed your caveat. Sorry.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Metcalf is a physical stud. We been looking for a guy like that for years.
HawkDawg wrote:No matter how you look at it, we finally have a dual threat on the receiving core.
obiken wrote:Not really, its all about RW. Not throw water on this whole post, but Metty is just a bodybuilder who cant run routes; Lockett is just a gadget WR. Doug Balwin, was a cut above them but a B+ WR at best. Nothing special about Will Disley, then all of a sudden, OH he is such a great TE, he was a DT at WA till they moved him to TE. Its Deon Branch all over again, Brady made DB a SB MVP, what was he under Matt H, who was a good not great qb? Nothing. Wilson can work with anyone, but dont get too excited about DKM, he is not that special, there is a REAL reason he dropped to 9th. Wait till he has to make a big play because our RGame is dog food. Put RW on the 9ers, put him the Ravens with a real line, not the one that's 31st in blocking. He would not have lost a game, period. Better yet how would Jimmy G do with our mutt food offense? Or how would LJ do if he was running behind the same line as RW? Imagine IF he had a REAL WR like a Julio Jones, or Amari Cooper, oh flock, oh dear!
obiken wrote:Okay I am wrong, I hope!
Aseahawkfan wrote:Metcalf is the real deal. Russell is amazing and make almost any receiver look good even with all the pressure he faces. He might finally have a stud WR and a great WR in Lockett. He has some weapons now. If Pete and John can build him a decent O-line and keep the running game going, we might have an offense. Then we just gotta hope he build a new defense cheap. I'd rather go cheaper on defense with a coach like Pete than offense. Pete can scheme and coach up rook defenders with talent. He doesn't seem to be able to do the same magic on offense.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests