jshawaii22 wrote:My dogs think I'm going crazy yelling "Don't Throw it, Russell.." but he did. Great win for the team and i don't care if they don't think this was a 'rivalry' game, it sure felt like one. Wow.
jshawaii22 wrote:Lockett didn't look that serious, as he was walking around, but you never know anymore.
From the doghouse to the penthouse as our DLine finally breaks through to look like a real NFL line and joining them is our 'all-pro?' kicker who did his job and won the game with another kick 12" from the right goalpost.
What a great game. For those that are interested, Richard Sherman and Russell greeted each other after the game and exchanged jerseys which is about as classy as you can get.
I also want to give a hand to whomever called down to to the field after the first quarter and told the refs to put the damn flags away for the rest of the game. They handed the 49'ers points. Both teams like to grab and pull.. .let 'em play!
trents wrote:Yes, Hollister is turning out to be sleeper acquisition. No one ever dreamed we would see the output he has delivered. He and Clowney might be the best steals of the year in the NFL when it comes to price/performance ratio.
But we are real thin right now at TE. I hope Hollister stays health and Dickson is ready to play again soon.
trents wrote:The sloppy play and bad offensive numbers, QB ratings, etc. on the part of both teams need to be put into the perspective of two exceptional defensive efforts. The niners have played great defense all year and the Hawks terrible defense all year until last night. As you say RD, hopefully this game was the coming out party of a Hawks' defense that has been underachieving until now. I would also add that though Clowney and the DL seemed to be bringing much better pressure last night than they have all year it was also true that Seattle's backers, corners and safeties were often locking down the niner receivers to give the DL more time to get to Garapalo. He wasn't able to consistently get the ball out quickly to wide open receivers. That was different too. Sacks and pressure by the DL and tight coverage of receivers go hand in hand.
trents wrote:Ha! Yes, Meyers likes that right goal post, doesn't he!
Gordon and Diggs both made significant contributions tonight. I hope that will continue and as they become more comfortable with Seattle's playbook it should. I thought the Hawks' coaching staff did a good job of putting them in situations where they could succeed.
RiverDog wrote:It was one of those good news/bad news games. The bad news was that we turned the ball over 3 times, one that resulted in a touchdown and another that took away a scoring opportunity in overtime. Russell did not have an MVP-like performance and played statistically his worst game of the season (so much for his Monday Night magic) and misfired in his first attempt in OT. We weren't nearly as effective running the ball as we normally are, Hunt got blown up then either he or Iupati screwed up and allowed a DT to come in untouched to sack Russell. Metcalf's turnover at the end of the first half cost us at least 3 and likely 7 points and could have been the difference in the game. Chris Carson put the ball on the ground again, but this time got lucky and got it back. Garappolo is a very pedestrian QB, easy to mess up with a little pressure, finished with a QBR of 18.9 and probably the worst QB play we'll see the rest of the season. We committed 9 costly penalties.
The good news is that we won. The DL played its best football of the season. Clowney was constantly in the backfield disrupting plays. Hopefully this is a break-through game for them and not an anomaly against a very pedestrian QB and an OL that has it's problems. If it's not just a fluke game, we might be punching our ticket to another SB. If not, we could be in trouble as we have a number of very tough games ahead and could easily lose 3 or 4 of them. Jason Myers redeemed himself. After last week, I thought that we could be looking at Blair Walsh 2.0. Russell shook off the INT he threw and came through for us in the end.
All in all, it was an exciting but very sloppy game with the turnovers, penalties, missed assignments, and sub par QB play. But make no mistake, this was a HUGE win.
We got a bit of a schedule break as our MNF game will not result in a short week as we head into our bye before making the long trip to the east coast for the 2nd of 4 consecutive Prime Time games. The Niners have an equally tough slate ahead of them as they get a rematch against a team that nearly beat them last week then a stretch of 3 games against the Packers, Ravens, and Saints.
idhawkman wrote:I'm not as critical of our team as you are just because that is a great defense we played and mistakes will happen when playing a great defense. RW did have the one bonehead play when he underthrew Collister but I bet he doesn't do that again. This game in my opinion boosted my evaluation of RW more than some of his other games just because he did it against a great defense.
idhawkman wrote:Needless to say, I'm stoked but at the same time I agree with another poster that the injuries to both teams may have long term impact on our abilities to win down the road. This was a very physical game and we couldn't ask for a better time to get a bye. Too sad for SF that they've already had their bye and they still need to play the two teams we lost to.
jshawaii22 wrote:49er's came in with the #1 ranked defense in the NFL for scoring, yards, first downs and passing D... Their D did not have any injuries to blame performance on. Yes, they sacked Russell 5 times, but most of that was in the first quarter++. Their "superstar" rookie Bosa did not have a sack or any meaningful stats and it was their blitzes that hurt us. I think our OLine did a good job, considering the opponent. How many holding / hands to the face / or other typical mistakes did they make? A couple of false starts and assignment issues with Hunt? OK -- That's a lot easier to fix.
jshawaii22 wrote:On another note, we have a far better group of receivers then SF, that's for sure. We simply don't drop balls. The fumble by DK was a 100% hustle play by a rookie that looks less and less like a rookie every game he plays.
Fumbles may be our downfall this year --
this was the first game I didn't travel to the Bay Area in 4 years to see the Hawks play. Last 3 years the tix were available from $40 up to maybe $200... this year, when I looked 2 weeks ago, the cheapest seat was $600.00 -- yesterday, stub hub had only singles for $800 and up. Talk about 'fair weather' fans down there in the South Bay!
jshawaii22 wrote:anyone else hear the audio for the OT coin toss and Geno called "tails" --- it was heads, and awarded to us? It caught me off guard and i was ready for Sherman to blow up. I'm not the only one, either. It was mentioned on a few national blogs.
jshawaii22 wrote:anyone else hear the audio for the OT coin toss and Geno called "tails" --- it was heads, and awarded to us? It caught me off guard and i was ready for Sherman to blow up. I'm not the only one, either. It was mentioned on a few national blogs.
You have to qualify the Niners receiving corps performance by noting that they were without their top two targets, Kittle and Sanders, but I do like how our receiving corps is shaping up. Hollister has done a good job stepping in for Dissley, made some tough catches.
Agreed about the fumbles. We put the ball on the ground 3 times yesterday. A run first, ball control offense like ours can't afford turnovers and penalties.
Interesting info on ticket prices. I'd love to see the Niners take hold in Santa Clara. It sure was a fun rivalry when Hairball was there.
NineR wrote:Tough game guys, you guys deserved it, interesting to see what week 17 brings
On the coin flip I definitely heard "Tails"but it was some sort of echo or the voice of "Bill Walsh"
Hawktawk wrote:He said heads in a southern twang hAIds. It was heads, just a weird tone of voice he used. It was meaningless as both teams possessed the ball multiple times. If Russ had put another foot of air under the ball to Hollister it would be worth a debate.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:We did get the ball for one more possession than the 49ers, but it was 3-2, not 2-1.
Seattle drives, throws pick.
49ers miss FG
Seattle goes 0-3 and punts
49ers go 0-3 and punts
Seattle drive and kicks field goal.
Three is better than two, but the 49ers blew it when a lot of teams might not even get one shot in overtime.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests