trents wrote:Pete is confident Locket will be available for the next game following the bye week. He described the injury as contusion.
I-5 wrote:Can someone remind me what type of injury put Gordon on the IR that he's not yet fully recovered from? He looks fine on the field, and looks super fit in his instagram, so it's not easy to tell what it is.
RiverDog wrote:Gordon looked really good Monday, making a couple of tough catches. It's going to take a couple of weeks before he'll be able to run all the route trees in the offense, but having the bye week in there will help him get up to speed.
As far as our WR corps being "scary", I'm not quite ready to go that far with my description, but we'll see. Lockett didn't come home with the team and spent the night in a bay area hospital with "severe swelling" in his leg. I haven't heard any word on the seriousness of his injury.
jshawaii22 wrote:Well I can tell you that if his first 2 receptions last Monday are any indications, yes, he'll make a good possession receiver. We don't need a 3rd deep receiver, we need another short, over the middle guy like Baldwin was. Look at Monday when Russell never threw a ball over 15 yards downfield to protect him against the 49er's doomsday pass rush. Short and quick moves that use body position to get open.
trents wrote:Concerning using more short, over the middle receiver routes, remember there has historically been criticism of Wilson's accuracy in those kind of throws. But it looks like he may be improving in that category.
trents wrote:I'm guessing those long drop backs had something to do with his stature and trying to flatten the angle of vision.
RiverDog wrote:Not sure as I'd have to do a lot more watching of videos, but it seems like Russell is staying in the pocket more and isn't taking as deep of drops as he used to. Perhaps that helps explains his improved accuracy on over the middle routes...if that's what we're seeing.
That's one thing that I'm very pleased about Russell's improved play this year vs. past seasons. He doesn't take 12-15 yard sacks anymore or end up aimlessly heaving the ball up. I'd much rather see him taking an 8-10 yard sack and make it 3rd and 12 rather than 3rd and 20.
Hawktawk wrote:One huge difference between Russ in all past years was to drop too deep or spin out the back of the pocket under pressure leading to some big scramble plays but also some horrific 15 to 20 yard sacks. This year he's more likely to climb the pocket or slide horizontal to the line of scrimmage while scanning the field in order to find an open receiver. Schottie needs to start getting some credit for continuing to develop Russ.
RiverDog wrote:I agree with the two posts above. All of that has contributed to Russell's improved pocket management.
The other thing I think is a factor is the normal maturation process human beings go through. Most people have a tendency to get smarter as they grow older, and Russell is now a seasoned veteran that's seen a lot of football. He understands the game and his own limitations better now than he did 2 or 3 years ago. We're watching a player that's at the peak of his career.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests