Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Politics, Religion, Salsa Recipes, etc. Everything you shouldn't bring up at your Uncle's house.

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:25 pm

Hawktawk wrote:Honestly we dont know what the odds are because we cant read minds. What's telling is how tight lipped many R senators are being.


There's been a number of them that have spoken out, and nearly all that have are against removal from office:

Sen. John Cornyn from Texas, after reading the whistleblower report and the partial transcript of the call with the Ukrainian president, said, "I wouldn't certainly wouldn't have said it the way the president said it, but it certainly doesn't rise to the level of impeachment. It's not a high crime and misdemeanor and it's — it shows how desperate and how politically driven with this whole, whole thing is."

Arizona Sen. Martha McSally told Politico that the Democrats' impeachment inquiry puts them "on a path to re-elect the president, keep the Senate majority [Republican] and possibly flip the House. It's a total distraction."

Iowa Senator Joni Ernst told reporters after a town hall last week that based on the whistleblower complaint and partial transcript alone, she did not see enough there to condemn the president, but she said the Senate will work in a bipartisan way to get to the bottom of the facts related to Ukraine.

Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina said in a statement after the release of the partial transcript of the Ukraine call that, "Nancy Pelosi should be embarrassed. The transcript debunks the Democrats' false claims against President Trump and demonstrates that their call to impeach him is a total farce. This is yet another pathetic attempt by Democrats to destroy President Trump with falsehoods to overturn the results of the 2016 election. It has not worked in the past, and it will not work now."

Other Republicans up for reelection in redder states said impeachment goes too far. This group includes West Virginia Senator Shelley Moore Capito, Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton, Montana Senator Steve Daines, Mississippi Senator Cindy Hyde Smith, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, Georgia Senator David Perdue, South Dakota Senator Mike Rounds, Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan, and Idaho Senator Jim Risch.


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/19-gop-sen ... t-inquiry/

Now that's 15 in just that one article that have spoken out against impeachment.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:38 pm

At this point I hope this motivates Americans to form a third party. These clowns are terrible. Like any of us believe Hunter Biden is getting paid for his special skills other than being the son of a powerful political figure. Those people are like Republicans that believe Trump tells the truth. These lying, corrupt politicians pay lip service to governing America for the people while they pursue their agendas treating this country like they own it and we're all just here as a nuisance herd they have to throw some scraps to.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Mon Oct 14, 2019 4:42 pm

Aseahawkfan wrote:At this point I hope this motivates Americans to form a third party. These clowns are terrible. Like any of us believe Hunter Biden is getting paid for his special skills other than being the son of a powerful political figure. Those people are like Republicans that believe Trump tells the truth. These lying, corrupt politicians pay lip service to governing America for the people while they pursue their agendas treating this country like they own it and we're all just here as a nuisance herd they have to throw some scraps to.


Agreed about the Biden's. It's pretty obvious that Hunter Biden was parlaying his father's name and fame into hundreds of thousands if not millions of dollars. Whether or not it was legal is beside the point. It's highly unethical and improper. Had Trump simply brought this Democratic/liberal hypocrisy to the attention of voters, I would have supported him.

But of course, that's not what he did.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Mon Oct 14, 2019 5:42 pm

RiverDog wrote:
There's been a number of them that have spoken out, and nearly all that have are against removal from office:

Sen. John Cornyn from Texas, after reading the whistleblower report and the partial transcript of the call with the Ukrainian president, said, "I wouldn't certainly wouldn't have said it the way the president said it, but it certainly doesn't rise to the level of impeachment. It's not a high crime and misdemeanor and it's — it shows how desperate and how politically driven with this whole, whole thing is."

Arizona Sen. Martha McSally told Politico that the Democrats' impeachment inquiry puts them "on a path to re-elect the president, keep the Senate majority [Republican] and possibly flip the House. It's a total distraction."

Iowa Senator Joni Ernst told reporters after a town hall last week that based on the whistleblower complaint and partial transcript alone, she did not see enough there to condemn the president, but she said the Senate will work in a bipartisan way to get to the bottom of the facts related to Ukraine.

Senator Thom Tillis from North Carolina said in a statement after the release of the partial transcript of the Ukraine call that, "Nancy Pelosi should be embarrassed. The transcript debunks the Democrats' false claims against President Trump and demonstrates that their call to impeach him is a total farce. This is yet another pathetic attempt by Democrats to destroy President Trump with falsehoods to overturn the results of the 2016 election. It has not worked in the past, and it will not work now."

Other Republicans up for reelection in redder states said impeachment goes too far. This group includes West Virginia Senator Shelley Moore Capito, Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy, Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton, Montana Senator Steve Daines, Mississippi Senator Cindy Hyde Smith, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Oklahoma Senator James Inhofe, Georgia Senator David Perdue, South Dakota Senator Mike Rounds, Alaska Senator Dan Sullivan, and Idaho Senator Jim Risch.


https://www.cbsnews.com/news/19-gop-sen ... t-inquiry/

Now that's 15 in just that one article that have spoken out against impeachment.

Ok
That leaves 3 who are already open to it and another 30 plus who are not saying much . The Dems need 20 so they need maybe 17 or 18 out of 30 who aren’t talking . So we will see and it gets uglier every time someone goes in front of the house.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:11 pm

Aseahawkfan wrote:At this point I hope this motivates Americans to form a third party. These clowns are terrible. Like any of us believe Hunter Biden is getting paid for his special skills other than being the son of a powerful political figure. Those people are like Republicans that believe Trump tells the truth. These lying, corrupt politicians pay lip service to governing America for the people while they pursue their agendas treating this country like they own it and we're all just here as a nuisance herd they have to throw some scraps to.

I’ve screamed about a 3rd party for years . Doesn’t look likely. I agree the hunter Biden thing is soft nepotism but it doesn’t matter. If Trump had wanted to bring it up during the campaign it was fair game but it’s becoming clear trump was soliciting collusion with a foreign country over a period of time using a private attorney as a point man and dangling congressionally approved aid as a carrot . It’s far deeper and more sinister than a phone call.Despicable, illegal , treasonous, impeachable .
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Mon Oct 14, 2019 6:37 pm

Hawktawk wrote:Ok

That leaves 3 who are already open to it and another 30 plus who are not saying much . The Dems need 20 so they need maybe 17 or 18 out of 30 who aren’t talking . So we will see and it gets uglier every time someone goes in front of the house.


That's only one article and it only included those Senators that are up for re-election in 2020. I'm sure that there's others that have spoken out on the subject, but I don't have the desire to research it.

My point is that the current consensus amongst the R Senators is that they don't approve of what Trump did but that they don't feel that it's an impeachable offense.

The RNC is giving the impeachment inquiry a tag: Kavanaugh 2.0.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:39 am

Hawktawk wrote:I’ve screamed about a 3rd party for years . Doesn’t look likely. I agree the hunter Biden thing is soft nepotism but it doesn’t matter. If Trump had wanted to bring it up during the campaign it was fair game but it’s becoming clear trump was soliciting collusion with a foreign country over a period of time using a private attorney as a point man and dangling congressionally approved aid as a carrot . It’s far deeper and more sinister than a phone call.Despicable, illegal , treasonous, impeachable .


Business as usual in Washington.

Tell me where they got he dossier with all the intel on Trump in Russia? Spin me the fairytale where it wasn't using foreign intelligence contacts to attack a political opponent, exactly what Trump is being accused of. Completely ignored by the press and the Trump Hate Crew. Politicians don't care about using foreign intelligence sources to investigate a political opponent as long as it is used against someone they hate. Don't even try to tell me crooked Hilary who nuked Bernie Sanders with the Democrats and helped pushed the Steele dossier that started this whole investigation to begin with is somehow less crooked than Narcissistic Jackass Trump.

Trump learned all this crap he's doing from politicians in Washington. He talked to people and learned what they do. The only part the jackass Trump didn't learn is how to hide it all and feign outrage when he is caught doing it. Something the Clinton's and Bush's are masters at. They are just as corrupt, do just as much scumbag crap, and do everything Trump has done, but the one saving grace for them is knowing how to avoid public attack and making friends with enough ofthe press to cover it all up.

But not jackass. He does it all and then expects to say "It's no big deal. It's not important." I've never seen such a bad politician as Trump. Any other president would ride this economy to a massive re-election, but not Trump. He's gotta fight everyone while doing all types of corrupt crap they do without the people in place to protect him well enough or the smarts to spin it properly to the press. I've literally seen most of the crimes Trump is accused of done by other presidents, but I've never seen a president so dumb as to offend the press or the opponents so much to drive them into a frenzy to take him down using the same tactics. The guy doesn't have the good sense to be a good politician. He's terrible at playing the D.C. game.

These politicians are mostly crooked or looney. Our political leadership is terrible right now.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Tue Oct 15, 2019 4:31 am

Aseahawkfan wrote:At this point I hope this motivates Americans to form a third party. These clowns are terrible. Like any of us believe Hunter Biden is getting paid for his special skills other than being the son of a powerful political figure. Those people are like Republicans that believe Trump tells the truth. These lying, corrupt politicians pay lip service to governing America for the people while they pursue their agendas treating this country like they own it and we're all just here as a nuisance herd they have to throw some scraps to.


Hawktawk wrote:I’ve screamed about a 3rd party for years . Doesn’t look likely. I agree the hunter Biden thing is soft nepotism but it doesn’t matter. If Trump had wanted to bring it up during the campaign it was fair game but it’s becoming clear trump was soliciting collusion with a foreign country over a period of time using a private attorney as a point man and dangling congressionally approved aid as a carrot . It’s far deeper and more sinister than a phone call.Despicable, illegal , treasonous, impeachable .


I agree with both those thoughts, except that HT needs to strike the word "treasonous" as the term requires us to be at war.

The only way a third party is going to get any traction is if a very popular figure from one of the two political parties decides to bolt, like Teddy Roosevelt did at the beginning of the last century, and even then, the odds would be stacked against them as in a 3 way Presidential election, if no one wins a majority in the electoral college, the election would go into the House and which ever party controlled that body would put their man/woman in. At this point, all a 3rd party candidate can hope for is to play the role of a spoiler, like Ross Perot did to Bush 41.

The other problem, in my opinion, is that even if a 3rd party did win enough seats in Congress and was able to put up competitive POTUS candidates, it wouldn't take them long to succumb to the same evils that the other two parties are currently gripped by. Unfortunately it seems like one of those things that's a common thread in American politics no matter what their ideological differences are.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Tue Oct 15, 2019 5:06 am

[quote="Aseahawkfan]

Business as usual in Washington.

Tell me where they got he dossier with all the intel on Trump in Russia? Spin me the fairytale where it wasn't using foreign intelligence contacts to attack a political opponent, exactly what Trump is being accused of. Completely ignored by the press and the Trump Hate Crew. Politicians don't care about using foreign intelligence sources to investigate a political opponent as long as it is used against someone they hate. Don't even try to tell me crooked Hilary who nuked Bernie Sanders with the Democrats and helped pushed the Steele dossier that started this whole investigation to begin with is somehow less crooked than Narcissistic Jackass Trump.

Trump learned all this crap he's doing from politicians in Washington. He talked to people and learned what they do. The only part the jackass Trump didn't learn is how to hide it all and feign outrage when he is caught doing it. Something the Clinton's and Bush's are masters at. They are just as corrupt, do just as much scumbag crap, and do everything Trump has done, but the one saving grace for them is knowing how to avoid public attack and making friends with enough ofthe press to cover it all up.

But not jackass. He does it all and then expects to say "It's no big deal. It's not important." I've never seen such a bad politician as Trump. Any other president would ride this economy to a massive re-election, but not Trump. He's gotta fight everyone while doing all types of corrupt crap they do without the people in place to protect him well enough or the smarts to spin it properly to the press. I've literally seen most of the crimes Trump is accused of done by other presidents, but I've never seen a president so dumb as to offend the press or the opponents so much to drive them into a frenzy to take him down using the same tactics. The guy doesn't have the good sense to be a good politician. He's terrible at playing the D.C. game.

These politicians are mostly crooked or looney. Our political leadership is terrible right now.[/quote]

Look
I agree with 99% of this . Where you lose me is comparing the Steele Dossier to what Trump has been doing for 4 years. The Dossier was originally requested by anti trump REPUBLICANS . It was a collection of intelligence on the eastern bloc connections Trump in fact had, the business dealings , corruption etc.To me the most fascinating revelation was the hookers in Moscow which could explain Trumps unwillingness to confront Putin in any meaningful way. While it’s true the Dems had possession of the dossier at some point it was never made public until after the election . In the case of Trump a man nominated for president publicly asked Russia to hack e mails, praised wiki leaks, publicly praised Putin etc. this Ukraine deal which gets uglier every time someone testifies is far worse than the Russian collusion . A sitting US president clearly circumvented the NSA apparatus to conduct a half baked pressure campaign dangling crucial aid purchased with your and mine tax dollars . There’s no equivalency moral or otherwise between the Steele dossier and the biggest political scandal in history .
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Fri Oct 18, 2019 5:21 pm

Hawktawk wrote:Look
I agree with 99% of this . Where you lose me is comparing the Steele Dossier to what Trump has been doing for 4 years. The Dossier was originally requested by anti trump REPUBLICANS . It was a collection of intelligence on the eastern bloc connections Trump in fact had, the business dealings , corruption etc.To me the most fascinating revelation was the hookers in Moscow which could explain Trumps unwillingness to confront Putin in any meaningful way. While it’s true the Dems had possession of the dossier at some point it was never made public until after the election . In the case of Trump a man nominated for president publicly asked Russia to hack e mails, praised wiki leaks, publicly praised Putin etc. this Ukraine deal which gets uglier every time someone testifies is far worse than the Russian collusion . A sitting US president clearly circumvented the NSA apparatus to conduct a half baked pressure campaign dangling crucial aid purchased with your and mine tax dollars . There’s no equivalency moral or otherwise between the Steele dossier and the biggest political scandal in history .


I have no idea why you keep calling this "the biggest political scandal" in history when we've had so much worse. Why is your history so bad?

The Iran-Contra Scandal fueled a war that lead to the death of a million people or so it is estimated.

Bill Clinton made some kind of deal during the Yugoslavian break up that let the Serbians get away with wiping out a village of 10,000 Bosnians. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/a-clinton-war-crime-20-years-later There are tons of articles about Clinton's handling of the former Yugoslavia and the war crimes he overlooked. Not to mention the Blackhawk Down incident. And the launching of missiles into Iraq during his impeachment.

Then there is the Bush 2/Cheney war crimes they are accused of leading to the Iraq War that never panned out like finding WMDs. Then the corporate crap that went on with companies like Blackwater and Halliburton's construction company KBR. Not to mention The Patriot Act.

Then there is Obama and the terrible Iran deal, the drone killings where we assassinated people without a trial, and the use of The Commerce Clause to push through a very unconstitutional Obamacare trash.

Why do you keep wanting to make out Trump to be worse than he is? Because of how much you hate him? He's small potatoes as far as political scandals go. Just too dumb to manipulate the system in his favor like the other agenda driven presidents we've had in office that were a lot better at manipulating and controlling the system.

You want to overlook the scandals of the other presidents because you hate Trump. He's still murdered way fewer people than past presidents. As far as letting Russia do what they want, I want you to explain why the Obama Sanctions after they invaded Ukraine were so weak? Was he in Putin's pocket as well? Why was nothing done when Erdogan took over Turkey during Obama's run? Obama did nothing to stop Erdogan's rise to power. He did nothing to stop Putin. I'm not sure why you and the press and these other clowns are putting all this trash that happened before Trump even came to power. Where was the outrage when Turkey was screwing the Kurds during Obama's run?

Learn more history. This is nowhere near the worst political scandals we've had. I hope you wake up so you can stop any of these liars and hypocrites and look for real leadership. If Americans aren't going to spend the time to learn the history of what we're doing and have done, they won't stop being lead around by corrupt politicians, journalists, and the like with their own agendas.

Time for the American people to wake up and keep their country out of this terrible foreign business that drags us into this corruption, since these countries are inherently corrupt due to their governmental systems. They are always looking to use us to take power and oppress some portion of their people. We need to stay out.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:58 am

Wow
For starters I was born in 1959. I know a lot about our history so maybe you just view history differently. Interesting you forget watergate. Maybe before your time.

I guess its a pick your poison debate.Iran Contra was a bungled half baked arms for hostages deal but I always thought it was done for a good reason, fighting communism in central america. How that deal caused a million casualties is a pipe dream as fighting was raging long before that deal.And Reagan being the statesman, the eloquent graceful leader we so dont have now he was apologized directly to the american people.

I was no fan of Clinton but the ethnic cleansing in Serbia was not our fault, we deployed aircraft to stop it and likely saved thousands of lives in a civil war. As for black hawk down it was a risk averse president who didn't provide needed resources, much the same as Benghazi. As for bombing an aspirin factory to wag the dog, no disagreement, happens all the time but never as much as right now.

Iraq is a tough one but EVERY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE ON THE PLANET believed Iraq had WMD. MOF there is considerable evidence that during the months of dithering waiting for the congressional approval Bush sought that Russia drove trucks down to Iraq and removed their WMD, satellite imagery etc definitely shows Russian trucks at Iraq weapons bunkers.. At any rate it was a war based on a misguided attempt to make america safer.

Iran deal wasn't perfect in the Obama administration but it was an attempt to keep a lid on their nuclear ambitions and at least Obama didn't say he is "in love" with their leader.

I see under numb nutz tearing the Iran deal up against the wishes of his own intelligence community, military brass, congress and every ally and a few enemies like Russia that's made us safer hasn't it? Ships being attacked and saber rattling with a military capable of causing great damage to us all over the middle east.And now they are helped greatly by Trump ceding control, basically retreating in disarray and humiliation in Syria. It helped Turkey who is now another of Trump's daddys, Russia who owns him, Iran, and Bashar al assad as Syria can now regroup. And ISIS as much as anyone.

Obama was weak and risk averse but unless I'm mistaken the Erogodon bloody takedown of a supposed coup happened under numb nutz. And they are supposedly a nato ally so how do we tell them who their president is. Trump got off the phone with a despot and green lighted ethnic cleansing of our allies and has tried to walk it back but it's too late, Turkey has taken the measure of this feckless coward and found him wanting just like Putin, Kim Jong Un, Deng from China, and so forth.

My biggest problem with him though is that he greenlighted Russian interference in 2016, colluded with our foreign adversary to win an election, committed multiple acts of obstruction of justice hampering their investigation to the point the absolute truth may never be known.

And on THE DAY AFTER MUELLER TESTIFIED he picked up the phone and asked Ukraine to investigate the Bidens, produce the Clinton server and sign on to the "crowdstrike" hoax that Ukraine had been the ones who influenced the 2016 election. Then in the midst of an impeachment inquiry that is gaining steam and popularity with the american people he announced that his resort Doral is going to host next years G7. Never mind there's already an emoluments lawsuit proceeding through the courts.
Talk about wagging the dog. Get busted colluding with Ukraine to win an election while dangling foreign aid, what the hell lets start a war on the Turkish Syrian border and sell our ISIS allies down the river.Then on the domestic front award yourself an international summit at your failing golf resort.


Yeah, biggest scandals ever, not even close , worst president in history, certainly the most mentally ill, a danger to the entire planet. Yeah I hate his F#(king guts, There's something definitely worth hating for this patriotic american.
So history that.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:59 am

Hawktawk wrote:Yeah, biggest scandals ever, not even close , worst president in history....So history that.


This isn't "history". It's real time, or current events. Until Trump resigns or is removed from office, it won't be the biggest scandal in history. If he gets impeached and stands trial, he'll have a shot at the #2 biggest scandal.

Time to step back from the rhetoric again, my friend.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Mon Oct 21, 2019 9:41 am

RiverDog wrote:
This isn't "history". It's real time, or current events. Until Trump resigns or is removed from office, it won't be the biggest scandal in history. If he gets impeached and stands trial, he'll have a shot at the #2 biggest scandal.

Time to step back from the rhetoric again, my friend.


No it is already the biggest scandal in our history which is unfolding before our eyes. Id get carpal tunnel going through it all. Colluding with Russia, obstructing the inquiry, campaign finance violations with porn stars, Tax evasion, obstruction of congress then this Ukraine deal, saying publicly China should investigate the Bidens.I could go on, the man is a walking talking colluding obstructing crime syndicate.

I think you and I agree that prior to Trump Watergate was the greatest scandal, obviously the only president to step down. The american people and the Senate wouldnt put up with a domestic political espionage plot a president covered up, using government agencies to punish foes, obstructing congress by ignoring subpoenas, cheating on his taxes.

The current crimes are far worse. The greatest part of this scandal will be if the senate normalizes this behavior and allows this man to serve one day past the end of the senate trial and odds are they will. It would rival the OJ trial.

The America I know and love hangs in the balance.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:25 pm

Hawktawk wrote:No it is already the biggest scandal in our history which is unfolding before our eyes. Id get carpal tunnel going through it all. Colluding with Russia, obstructing the inquiry, campaign finance violations with porn stars, Tax evasion, obstruction of congress then this Ukraine deal, saying publicly China should investigate the Bidens.I could go on, the man is a walking talking colluding obstructing crime syndicate.

I think you and I agree that prior to Trump Watergate was the greatest scandal, obviously the only president to step down. The american people and the Senate wouldnt put up with a domestic political espionage plot a president covered up, using government agencies to punish foes, obstructing congress by ignoring subpoenas, cheating on his taxes.

The current crimes are far worse. The greatest part of this scandal will be if the senate normalizes this behavior and allows this man to serve one day past the end of the senate trial and odds are they will. It would rival the OJ trial.

The America I know and love hangs in the balance.


There's an unwritten rule that historians wait 15-20 years before analyzing a POTUS so as to let events run their course. They want to purge themselves of emotional responses such as the ones you're engaging in. Harry Truman is a great example. His contemporaries thought him the worst POTUS in history. He left office with an approval rating in the 20's. Even Truman himself said that he didn't think that he couldn't get elected dog catcher. But today, after the cold war ran its course, people began to understand and agree with him when he made the decision not to drop the bomb on North Korea and why he relieved General McArthur.

I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm saying that you're analysis is premature. You're guessing that he'll be the worst POTUS in history.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:56 pm

Again it’s all perspective my friend. In my mind he’s far and away the worst , least qualified most unstable president in my lifetime. History will not be kind either to him or his bobble head republican supporters .
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Mon Oct 21, 2019 3:45 pm

Hawktawk wrote:Again it’s all perspective my friend. In my mind he’s far and away the worst, least qualified most unstable president in my lifetime. History will not be kind either to him or his bobble head republican supporters .


So long as you use the "IMO" disclaimer, then I'm good with it. It's when you start talking in absolutes that I tend to disagree.

I hope that we both live long enough to see how history will judge these past 2.5 years. A lot will depend on his successor.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:11 pm

Depends on if he gets impeached. Trump seems far worse than what he's done. History will look back at this period and if things were stable, the economy good, and the nation doing well, how you going to rate the president terribly unless you hate him because he is such an unlikeable jackass that runs his mouth too much. He'll certainly win the pettiest, most ridiculous,and unprofessional president of all time if they rate those categories.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:01 am

Aseahawkfan wrote:Depends on if he gets impeached. Trump seems far worse than what he's done. History will look back at this period and if things were stable, the economy good, and the nation doing well, how you going to rate the president terribly unless you hate him because he is such an unlikeable jackass that runs his mouth too much. He'll certainly win the pettiest, most ridiculous,and unprofessional president of all time if they rate those categories.


Yup. It's hard to put a frowning face on peace and prosperity. If Trump were to resign today, he would be leaving the country in decent shape, certainly better than some of his recent predecessors. If the economy tanks in 2020 and they attribute at least part of it to his trade wars, then we're talking a different story.

But I do think that style counts, even with historians. Reagan was well liked by historians not only because he managed the economy and was key in winning the cold war, but because he had an ability to unite the nation (see his speech after the Challenger accident) and was affable enough to take responsibility for his own scandal (Iran-Contra). JFK gets credits for his eloquent style of speaking and his jocular news conferences, FDR for his fireside chats. None of that is present with Donald Trump, and IMO historians will discount his presidency because of his narcissism, his thin skin and combative nature, and his racist remarks.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Tue Oct 22, 2019 4:15 pm

RiverDog wrote:Yup. It's hard to put a frowning face on peace and prosperity. If Trump were to resign today, he would be leaving the country in decent shape, certainly better than some of his recent predecessors. If the economy tanks in 2020 and they attribute at least part of it to his trade wars, then we're talking a different story.

But I do think that style counts, even with historians. Reagan was well liked by historians not only because he managed the economy and was key in winning the cold war, but because he had an ability to unite the nation (see his speech after the Challenger accident) and was affable enough to take responsibility for his own scandal (Iran-Contra). JFK gets credits for his eloquent style of speaking and his jocular news conferences, FDR for his fireside chats. None of that is present with Donald Trump, and IMO historians will discount his presidency because of his narcissism, his thin skin and combative nature, and his racist remarks.


The idiot runs this country like it's his personal business. He doesn't understand the word limitations or the legal limits on the president. He does whatever and expects everyone to back him. He's tiresome.

If the guy weren't such an idiot, he would be winning re-election in a landslide.

If the Democrats weren't so terrible, they would take the presidency easily.

The fact that Trump with all his baggage still has a chance at winning re-election is how terrible the Democrats are. Even with them seeking impeachment, Trump still has a chance to win because their platform is so terrible and their face are people that put down America and Americans all the time or act like a bunch of overly politically correct ninnies. What an awful position for the American people to be in.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:31 pm

Aseahawkfan wrote:The idiot runs this country like it's his personal business. He doesn't understand the word limitations or the legal limits on the president. He does whatever and expects everyone to back him. He's tiresome.


Personal business is right. He wouldn't survive a day in a publicly owned corporation. He wouldn't get away with half the chit he does if he were a CEO of a Fortune 500 company. If the Board of Directors heard rumors of him banging a pornstar, he'd be tossed out with the daily garbage. And a CEO would understand what the term "conflict of interest" means, that you can't mix your personal business with company (or in Trump's case, government) business. Trump has never had to worry about working for a boss or a Board of Directors.

Aseahawkfan wrote:If the guy weren't such an idiot, he would be winning re-election in a landslide. If the Democrats weren't so terrible, they would take the presidency easily.

The fact that Trump with all his baggage still has a chance at winning re-election is how terrible the Democrats are. Even with them seeking impeachment, Trump still has a chance to win because their platform is so terrible and their face are people that put down America and Americans all the time or act like a bunch of overly politically correct ninnies. What an awful position for the American people to be in.


I don't think it would be a Reagan-type landslide. There are too many deep blue states on the west coast and northeast that would for any D and against any R that would prevent a Republican candidate from winning more than 40 states. But your point is valid. A decent R candidate could win with an Obama-type margin if the Dems were to trot out someone like the Mad Scientist or Pocahontas.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Wed Oct 23, 2019 8:41 am

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/23/politics ... index.html

A CNN poll out today shows Biden has again surged to a huge lead following the last debate where his performance was widely criticized by the pro Warren liberal wing of the media. The voters, the majority of the democrats, independents, and former republicans turned independents like me understand its about winning. Assuming Trump hasn't been impeached, resigned or burned up from spontaneous combustion the least thing the free world needs is the orange baboon having talking points like pocahontas or radical socialist next fall. America needs sanity, calm, competent.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Wed Oct 23, 2019 9:12 am

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/2 ... run-055565

Interesting. I've heard the guy speak. He has some gravitas. Anyone but Trump and Id support this guy over Biden too. I always hear a third party candidate is "unelectable". Its so stupid. We could elect daffy duck with the people who dont even vote.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Wed Oct 23, 2019 10:43 am

Hawktawk wrote:https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/23/dicks-sporting-goods-ceo-presidential-run-055565

Interesting. I've heard the guy speak. He has some gravitas. Anyone but Trump and Id support this guy over Biden too. I always hear a third party candidate is "unelectable". Its so stupid. We could elect daffy duck with the people who dont even vote.


Thanks for the link. If I'm given the choice between Trump and Sanders, Warren, Harris, et al, I could see myself voting for him as a protest vote like I did with Johnson in 2016.

But don't kid yourself about a 3rd party. It wouldn't take them long to fall prey to the same forces that the other two parties have. It's an unfortunate side effect to our system of government. Sometimes I think we'd be better off under a monarchy.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Wed Oct 23, 2019 1:39 pm

We are under a duopoly monarchy. Third parties don’t get to debate. Both parties and both ends of the media spectrum vilified Johnson out of fear of which way his vote would cut. He was excluded from the general election debates in spite of better polls than Perot in the day.

We’re already living under a totalitarian government . We don’t make the rules . Our vote does not count. It’s why I completely disagree on the electoral college as well as winner take all states. In eastern wa if you support anyone but a democrat at the state or national level your vote is toilet paper. It’s like that nationally and in every state that’s winner take all.

As for this gentleman from the sporting goods franchise he called his board together and convinced them to make a decision that would cost them hundreds of millions in sales and stock in the short term for the good of the country . I don’t see him rolling over anytime soon. It’s the utterly corrupt duopoly of republicrats and demicans destroying America .
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Wed Oct 23, 2019 2:26 pm

Hawktawk wrote:We’re already living under a totalitarian government . We don’t make the rules . Our vote does not count. It’s why I completely disagree on the electoral college as well as winner take all states. In eastern wa if you support anyone but a democrat at the state or national level your vote is toilet paper. It’s like that nationally and in every state that’s winner take all.


My idea that I've run up the flag pole in this forum a couple of times is to pass a Constitutional amendment requiring all states to distribute their electoral votes one to each Congressional district and for the remaining two to be awarded to the state wide winner. That would put states like California and Texas back in play and rid ourselves of battleground states where the candidates spend the vast majority of their time during the general election campaign.

But it will never fly. As divided as the country is now, nothing's going to get 2/3's majority in both Congress and the states.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Wed Oct 23, 2019 2:53 pm

I think we would be better off under a hiring system that removes a lot of power from the government. If the president would be a president rather than the "Leader of the Free World" and all this poppycock BS, then we would be ok. No one was suppose to love and worship the president. He was supposed to be a competent man that presides over the nation, not rules it, commands a massive military, or oversees trillions in tax dollars for the management of a pseudo-socialist government. We've grown into this monstrosity of a nation that everyone seems to call to get help with their problems from their neighbors.

The fact we have people going, "Why are we leaving the Kurds in Syria?" is proof enough these clowns have overly involved us in word affairs. Our actual answer should be let them take care of themselves while we take care of ourselves. Step on our soil and we'll send you to hell. Keep your crap in your own countries if you want to live enslaved to religions and dictators, have at it. We do not fight your wars for you. But instead we're getting sold we're some kind of heroes who are supposed to defend the free world even if it means bankrupting our nation and sending our guys to die on foreign soil. It's not right and should not be our philosophy.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Wed Oct 23, 2019 5:18 pm

Aseahawkfan wrote:I think we would be better off under a hiring system that removes a lot of power from the government. If the president would be a president rather than the "Leader of the Free World" and all this poppycock BS, then we would be ok. No one was suppose to love and worship the president. He was supposed to be a competent man that presides over the nation, not rules it, commands a massive military, or oversees trillions in tax dollars for the management of a pseudo-socialist government. We've grown into this monstrosity of a nation that everyone seems to call to get help with their problems from their neighbors.


Government is a necessary evil. The best we can hope for is to limit their power, particularly through the court system. As far as loving and worshiping the POTUS, I agree, we're electing a manager, not a Pope. But on the other hand, I want someone that I can respect and that's halfway intelligent instead of this narcissistic, racist, xenophobic, thin skinned, stupid, spoiled rich kid buffoon that we have in DJT. The man is an utter embarrassment that I have to constantly make excuses for to friends of mine looking to learn about what it means to be an American.

Aseahawkfan wrote:The fact we have people going, "Why are we leaving the Kurds in Syria?" is proof enough these clowns have overly involved us in word affairs. Our actual answer should be let them take care of themselves while we take care of ourselves. Step on our soil and we'll send you to hell. Keep your crap in your own countries if you want to live enslaved to religions and dictators, have at it. We do not fight your wars for you. But instead we're getting sold we're some kind of heroes who are supposed to defend the free world even if it means bankrupting our nation and sending our guys to die on foreign soil. It's not right and should not be our philosophy.


Yea, I'd like to be a little less aggressive internationally, particularly in the Middle East. We've done ourselves more harm than good in that region. I'm not sure if that means pulling out of Syria, but I do agree with the general philosophy of going to a lower profile over there. The problem is that Trump does everything on the spur of the moment and by the seat of his pants without consulting with our allies or even his own advisors. You can't just pull the carpet out from under people we've been supporting for years and in some cases decades.

I read the other day where the Pentagon is drawing up plans for an immediate and complete withdrawal from Afghanistan because they're afraid that some morning they'll wake up to orders for them to pull out yesterday. Trump does not have a clear vision of where he wants to take our country. He'll hear someone talking on Fox News and think to himself "that sounds like a good idea" then picks up his phone and orders people to do it.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Wed Oct 23, 2019 10:05 pm

RiverDog wrote:Yea, I'd like to be a little less aggressive internationally, particularly in the Middle East. We've done ourselves more harm than good in that region. I'm not sure if that means pulling out of Syria, but I do agree with the general philosophy of going to a lower profile over there. The problem is that Trump does everything on the spur of the moment and by the seat of his pants without consulting with our allies or even his own advisors. You can't just pull the carpet out from under people we've been supporting for years and in some cases decades.

I read the other day where the Pentagon is drawing up plans for an immediate and complete withdrawal from Afghanistan because they're afraid that some morning they'll wake up to orders for them to pull out yesterday. Trump does not have a clear vision of where he wants to take our country. He'll hear someone talking on Fox News and think to himself "that sounds like a good idea" then picks up his phone and orders people to do it.


Our people have been taught to support any action to go into any nation to help against the "bad guys" even if they have no idea what caused the conflict in the first place. We have relations with every nation in the world in some way. Since Russia and China don't help much and India isn't really capable of much help, we get the constant call. Europe doesn't help all that much either militarily, So we've ended up as world police force that uses our military to keep the peace. It was not intended that we do so and is certainly leading us to a constant state of war. We've had a war nearly every decade since we've existed. That's just not a smart way to run a nation. Nor does it seem morally right.

The media is very irresponsible. Look at these hypocritical vultures. The left wing media were some of the biggest anti-war zealots during the Iraq War and attacking Saudi Arabia and the like when they killed Khashoggi. Now they're interested in Syria and the Kurds even when Saudi Arabia was heavily involved in the Syrian conflict. It was a Sunni and Shiite conflict most Americans knew nothing about. They let us stay involved in their trash conflict for control of the Middle East. They are not consistent at all.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:44 am

Aseahawkfan wrote:
Our people have been taught to support any action to go into any nation to help against the "bad guys" even if they have no idea what caused the conflict in the first place. We have relations with every nation in the world in some way. Since Russia and China don't help much and India isn't really capable of much help, we get the constant call. Europe doesn't help all that much either militarily, So we've ended up as world police force that uses our military to keep the peace. It was not intended that we do so and is certainly leading us to a constant state of war. We've had a war nearly every decade since we've existed. That's just not a smart way to run a nation. Nor does it seem morally right.

The media is very irresponsible. Look at these hypocritical vultures. The left wing media were some of the biggest anti-war zealots during the Iraq War and attacking Saudi Arabia and the like when they killed Khashoggi. Now they're interested in Syria and the Kurds even when Saudi Arabia was heavily involved in the Syrian conflict. It was a Sunni and Shiite conflict most Americans knew nothing about. They let us stay involved in their trash conflict for control of the Middle East. They are not consistent at all.


I think you underestimate the good things that have come out of our engagement with the world. The good book says "Of whom much has been given will much be required". We have been blessed with more good things than any nation in the history of the world.We have in america the most rich natural resources, the most secure perch in terms of a land invasion, the richest country in the world in many ways.

I can agree there have been many misguided adventures starting with my earliest memories of Vietnam but imagine had the US stayed out of the world wars? The help rebuilding Europe and Japan have given us stable trading partners and reliable allies (until Trump). And WTF were we supposed to do when Bin Laden ordered hijacking of planes killing 3000 americans? say oh well??? 95% of americans approved of the war on terror and its never going to be over nor can it be. There was a near unanimous vote in the congress for Iraq, a universal belief from virtually every intelligence service on the planet that Hussein had WMD.

Is it bad he's gone ? We've paid an awful price but the country is better off IMO. And as we learned when Obama did what you suggested, yanked the troops prematurely along comes ISIS. As Mattis, far more wise than the orange baboon said recently. "we can want to withdraw, we can withdraw but the enemy gets the vote"

Were we supposed to sit back and watch ISIS murder 100+ at the bataclan, commit atrocities all over the world and capture oil fields, huge swaths of the middle east? Military commanders in this country devised a plan of a super light footprint of 2500 special forces in Syria for the final battle with ISIS. We lost SIX TROOPS. The Kurds we convinced to join us lost 12000. And in one day Trump dismantled it, Isis fighters on the loose, Russian and Turkish troops occupying our bases we deserted and ran from.Hundreds of thousands of refugees. A total humiliating defeat, an unforced error.

Here's the deal, we have 5% of the world's population but we consume 30% of its resources. We have to be benevolent, we have to be engaged in global policy and if needed global policing. We are the only nation capable. It's why I've been so freaked out about Trump being installed by Putin and basically doing his bidding at every turn, weakening nato etc. Our men and women certainly don't want endless deployments but they volunteered, raised their hand and took an oath and from the reporting I've seen they are P!$$ed about what has happened in Syria from the generals to the boots on the ground. 5 years down the toilet in one phone call.

And the troops aren't coming home either. They are being positioned in Iraq and another 2000 are going to saudi arabia to protect their oil from Iran....Our foreign policy has never been more F' d up in my lifetime. :x :x :x :x
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Thu Oct 24, 2019 8:35 pm

Hawktawk wrote:I think you underestimate the good things that have come out of our engagement with the world. The good book says "Of whom much has been given will much be required". We have been blessed with more good things than any nation in the history of the world.We have in america the most rich natural resources, the most secure perch in terms of a land invasion, the richest country in the world in many ways.

I can agree there have been many misguided adventures starting with my earliest memories of Vietnam but imagine had the US stayed out of the world wars? The help rebuilding Europe and Japan have given us stable trading partners and reliable allies (until Trump). And WTF were we supposed to do when Bin Laden ordered hijacking of planes killing 3000 americans? say oh well??? 95% of americans approved of the war on terror and its never going to be over nor can it be. There was a near unanimous vote in the congress for Iraq, a universal belief from virtually every intelligence service on the planet that Hussein had WMD.

Is it bad he's gone ? We've paid an awful price but the country is better off IMO. And as we learned when Obama did what you suggested, yanked the troops prematurely along comes ISIS. As Mattis, far more wise than the orange baboon said recently. "we can want to withdraw, we can withdraw but the enemy gets the vote"

Were we supposed to sit back and watch ISIS murder 100+ at the bataclan, commit atrocities all over the world and capture oil fields, huge swaths of the middle east? Military commanders in this country devised a plan of a super light footprint of 2500 special forces in Syria for the final battle with ISIS. We lost SIX TROOPS. The Kurds we convinced to join us lost 12000. And in one day Trump dismantled it, Isis fighters on the loose, Russian and Turkish troops occupying our bases we deserted and ran from.Hundreds of thousands of refugees. A total humiliating defeat, an unforced error.

Here's the deal, we have 5% of the world's population but we consume 30% of its resources. We have to be benevolent, we have to be engaged in global policy and if needed global policing. We are the only nation capable. It's why I've been so freaked out about Trump being installed by Putin and basically doing his bidding at every turn, weakening nato etc. Our men and women certainly don't want endless deployments but they volunteered, raised their hand and took an oath and from the reporting I've seen they are P!$$ed about what has happened in Syria from the generals to the boots on the ground. 5 years down the toilet in one phone call.

And the troops aren't coming home either. They are being positioned in Iraq and another 2000 are going to saudi arabia to protect their oil from Iran....Our foreign policy has never been more F' d up in my lifetime. :x :x :x :x


We cannot stay at war forever. Have you read on the first world war? We did not need to be involved. All the dumbass Europeans did was fight each other, then divide the spoils. You read all their colonial BS? The World Wars are why we're involved in the Middle East to begin with. Take some time to read on the progression from World War 1. We're still dealing with the aftermath of that idiotic war that kept on going. Post world war 1 brought us the current state of the Middle East, the promise Israel remade, the oil problems, the rise of Russia as a world power, the colonialism and rise of socialism due to the poor treatment of other nations by colonial powers, and the like. The list is long and ongoing.

We are no more resource rich than other nations. This idea we have this gross amount of resources more than other places is ridiculous. These other countries had plenty of resources, especially places like Canada, Russia, and Central and South America. What we had that has stood out from the rest of the world is a highly motivated and free population unfettered by all the trash class system that plagued other nations and drove the rise of socialism and communism because the noble and merchant class screwed the peasants when freedom and capitalism finally established themselves in those lands.

Stop believing the hype. It's a lie that is not supported by history that gets sold to us. Other nations have had immense resources. They squander them because they have old world government systems and deep corruption, nepotism, and scumbaggery that remains institutionalized in their systems due to their cultural mores. What we have is not superior resources, but a superior culture that was at one point driven by productivity, self-improvement, exceptionalism, and the like that made the use of resources extraordinary and attracted the world's talent to a land where their extraordinariness would be rewarded.Now these clowns in groups like The Squad want to make all that seem like luck or some easily duplicated feat by the common people. That's horsecrap.

We were taught to reach for the stars. And that type of society breeds extraordinary feats.

I see this new idea that other cultures are just different is horsecrap. Cultures in the Middle East are poisonous. The monarchies and therocracies that populate their land. Their power politics where killing the other guy is the best way to hold power. The tribal politics. The religious battling. You ever read on that area of the world? They murdered the grandson of Mohammed and Mohammd's adopted son and one of his first disciples Ali. Violence has been the way of things in that area of the world, not peace like so many try to claim. If they want real change, they're going to have to make it happen, not us.

I could go on for ages discussing this. But stop buying into the hype. We do not have the most resources or blessings or what not. We had an extraordinary culture that used to value liberty and the pursuit of greatness that we call happiness. We have been poisoning ourselves by involving ourselves in these constant wars. The only wars we've fought that were truly worth fighting for a good cause was The Civil War and World War 2 only because the moral vileness we were fighting against in slavery and Hitler's vision of Germany. All these other wars have been nothing but a constant stream of mistakes by men drunk on power and willing to lie to the American people to keep us constantly at war or to take land and resources.

It's not a matter of disengaging from the world which I am not encouraging. It is a matter of not engaging in a way where were backing one scumbag over another, then marketing lies to our people that this scumbag is better than that scumbag. Really our money and military help is being used to oppress one group over another with only token measures taken towards truly improving the lives of the people in a given nation. We must always ask ourselves are we truly supporting freedom and the betterment of another people or are we helping a tyrant hold power to help a handful of companies and wealthy men more wealthy?

The Bible also talks of free will. And letting men sin and learn from their sins. Not for us to be some kind of force of punishment or chooser of the fates of other men by use of superior military might. The greatest men and women of the Bible were not those that made war on others wishing to control their fates or make money, but to be the greatest example of how to live well so that others by that example will seek betterment. That is not our policy at the moment. Our history clearly shows we are engaged in choosing one evil man over another to prop up tyrants for money and power to divide up the world. That is closer to the work of Satan if you wish to translate it by Biblical standards, not God. For America is not God and should not act as such looking to control other nations from afar with military power and money.

And one last note, we are not the only nation capable of policing the world. We are the only nation that is involved in doing so. Europe, Russia, China, and many other nations have plenty of power to police. They did it for years prior to us doing it...until they couldn't afford to do so. The same direction we're headed. Other people do not want us there to help, they are using us and us them. That is no way to truly improve the world. You list any war and I'll discuss it more in depth with you and show you what I'm talking about.

I used to believe like you. I finally woke up after reading on World War 1. I highly recommend deep reading on that war. We are where we are now because of that war. That war was a major driver of modern American foreign policy and the current map of the world.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Thu Oct 24, 2019 9:00 pm

Hawktawk wrote: I can agree there have been many misguided adventures starting with my earliest memories of Vietnam but imagine had the US stayed out of the world wars? The help rebuilding Europe and Japan have given us stable trading partners and reliable allies (until Trump). And WTF were we supposed to do when Bin Laden ordered hijacking of planes killing 3000 americans? say oh well??? 95% of americans approved of the war on terror and its never going to be over nor can it be. There was a near unanimous vote in the congress for Iraq, a universal belief from virtually every intelligence service on the planet that Hussein had WMD.

Is it bad he's gone ? We've paid an awful price but the country is better off IMO. And as we learned when Obama did what you suggested, yanked the troops prematurely along comes ISIS. As Mattis, far more wise than the orange baboon said recently. "we can want to withdraw, we can withdraw but the enemy gets the vote"


And on Osama, answer me this question Hawktawk, why did we go to Afghanistan and Iraq for a Saudi national? Why did we attack Iraq and Afghanistan when 15 of the hijckers were Saudi? Clue me in on why we went after nations surrounding Iran and continue to paint Iran as our biggest enemy when the biggest terrorist attack in U.S. history was committed by a group of Saudi Arabians?

You ever stop and really contemplate why things happen this way? You ever dig deeper to figure out why our ally Saudi Arabia had a group of their citizens launch the largest terrorist attack in U.S. history and we instead go after Afghanstan and Iraq who were completely uninvolved in the attack?

You wonder why I consider Trump small potatoes as far as corruption We're getting played for fools by men a lot smarter and more well spoken than Trump by a good measure. Trump is a rich, narcissistic man playing in a pool well out of his depth. He's dumb compared to the guys that really push us in bad directions.

First thing you need to do is take off the blinders and start asking hard questions that don't have answers you want to read on.

Look where the hijackers came from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijackers_in_the_September_11_attacks All of them came from "allied" nations. Not one from Iraq or Afghanistan. Yet we go to war in those places, directly placed around Iran. Wake up, hawktawk. Wake the hell up. We been getting played and we're paying the bill in blood and money.

Why you all keep ignoring this reality is beyond me. And it's not just you. It's literally everyone both Democratic and Republican. This is why I laugh at the deep state and conspiracy theories. The guys screwing us over are literally doing it in front of our eyes. We're just so led around by the media and personal beliefs, we don't to go , "Wait, wtf are you people doing?" Although if you really oppose the real powerful people, they will destroy you anyway. You'll end up like Snowden, Asssange, or any number of people that get destroyed for getting too many people to acknowledge the truth.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Fri Oct 25, 2019 8:19 am

Asea I've never ignored where the hijackers came from. I dont understand the fascination with saudi Arabia, well with this administration its $$$$$$$$ in Trumps pockets to the point they can butcher a US resident dissedent reporter in a foreign embassy with no repercussions.

I never understood letting Bin Laden's relatives depart by air when the entire nation was grounded following 911. But clearly Bin Laden and the al qaeda training camps were in Afghanistan.We had to go there. Iraq? we didn't have to go there but had Saddam Hussein allowed full inspection of his country we would not have.

I think the truth is in the middle. Frankly you say a lot of stuff, your views are very unconventional regarding many things, it doesn't make you right or wrong but saying we shouldn't have been in WW1? Come on man. Trying to be everywhere all the time isn't right but isolationism definitely made WW2 far worse and we only engaged after it was nearly too late following pearl harbor.
We have to stay engaged in the war on terror, better to kill them on foreign soil than here.

The truths in the middle man. take a deep breath.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Hawktawk » Fri Oct 25, 2019 8:31 am

Meanwhile on the impeachment front Trump said the republicans need to get "tough on impeachment". On que 20 republican congressmen storm the secure "pit" disrupting the testimony of the Asst sec of defense who had become another of many govt officials to defy the WH subpoena. Lindsey Graham, the most despicable senator in history crafts a 4 page document attacking the inquiry process that Moscow Mitch co signed, and then this morning this broke.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/24/us/p ... ation.html

It had been reported that when he wasn't a fringe player in the Ukraine mess that the Walrus Bob Barr was jet setting around the world *assisting* Durham in gathering *facts* from foreign governments. Like that's all the AG of the united states of america has to do :lol: :lol: :lol: ....What are they being promised? what's being held over their heads?

What a convenient time to leak this. This was surely Barrs personal decision, strictly for public consumption. After his 4 page whitewash of the Mueller report that was proven utterly false coupled with his ignoring/exonerating the President on Ukraine despite 3 separate criminal referrals does the man have any credibility other than with Faux, Trump and the 40% Trumptard base? Most corrupt AG in history, fits right in this administration.
Hawktawk
Legacy
 
Posts: 8481
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:57 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby c_hawkbob » Fri Oct 25, 2019 8:52 am

On que 20 republican congressmen storm the secure "pit" disrupting the testimony of the Asst sec of defense who had become another of many govt officials to defy the WH subpoena.


And at least 10 of them already had credentials to be there. This was pure made for TV grandstanding, nothing more.
User avatar
c_hawkbob
Legacy
 
Posts: 7478
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 3:34 pm
Location: Paducah Kentucky, 42001

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Fri Oct 25, 2019 9:03 am

On que 20 republican congressmen storm the secure "pit" disrupting the testimony of the Asst sec of defense who had become another of many govt officials to defy the WH subpoena.


c_hawkbob wrote:And at least 10 of them already had credentials to be there. This was pure made for TV grandstanding, nothing more.


Yea, this whole closed door complaint rings hollow. Then Representative Lindsey Graham supported it when it was Democrat Bill Clinton that was being investigated. It's SOP to take initial testimony behind closed doors then make it public at a later date. More red meat for Trump's base.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Sat Oct 26, 2019 5:50 pm

Hawktawk wrote:Asea I've never ignored where the hijackers came from. I dont understand the fascination with saudi Arabia, well with this administration its $$$$$$$$ in Trumps pockets to the point they can butcher a US resident dissedent reporter in a foreign embassy with no repercussions.

I never understood letting Bin Laden's relatives depart by air when the entire nation was grounded following 911. But clearly Bin Laden and the al qaeda training camps were in Afghanistan.We had to go there. Iraq? we didn't have to go there but had Saddam Hussein allowed full inspection of his country we would not have.

I think the truth is in the middle. Frankly you say a lot of stuff, your views are very unconventional regarding many things, it doesn't make you right or wrong but saying we shouldn't have been in WW1? Come on man. Trying to be everywhere all the time isn't right but isolationism definitely made WW2 far worse and we only engaged after it was nearly too late following pearl harbor.
We have to stay engaged in the war on terror, better to kill them on foreign soil than here.

The truths in the middle man. take a deep breath.


My fascination with Saudi Arabia? I can't understand Americans completely ignoring the tyranny we support while claiming we're doing good. How can you call out Trump when you've literally ignored the massive corruption for years of other administrations that overlooked what Saudi Arabia and other tyrant nations have been doing and what they teach in their land? The Wahhabi religion is the primary religion of the vast majority of terrorists and it hails from Saudi Arabia. Why wouldn't I educate myself on this when I want the real destruction of terrorism, not this endless war against terror to justify any military action American politicians sell us.

Do you want real change or not? Or do you just want to get rid of Trump so you can go back to pretending we're doing good in the world and the president is a decent man?

Do you ever stop and think about the BS you're sold? Think about the following:

1. You're being sold Putin is a bad guy and Russia is a danger to U.S. Democracy while American oil companies, businesses, and politicians are doing business in Russia and making Putin rich. The Europeans buy major portions of their oil and gas from Russia, while pretending they're outraged by Ukraine.

2. China is also being sold as a big bad guy, while our businesses are chomping at the bit to sell in their market. We're producing massive goods in China for sale here. We're enriching their country while being sold they're oppressive bad guys we should be afraid of.

3. You're sold that Iran and Syria are terrible nations and we should unseat them from power, yet the biggest terrorist attack on American soil was committed by Saudi nationals. Saudi Arabia's national religion Wahhabism paints as a The Great Satan and bad guys.

The list of hypocrisy is long. The truth is not somewhere in between. The truth is that our government is driven by agendas. They are in the open and you can read the agenda if you take the time. The media has more influence on the American mindset than they are given credit for. They support much of the power agenda of D.C.

What I'm trying to get across to you is if you want to root out real corruption and see change, then you have to stay awake to what is going on. Getting rid of the Narcissistic Jackass does not change that our government in general is beholden to foreign interests. These lies that Trump is somehow any more bought and sold by foreign interests than any of these other guys is total BS. The proof is right there available for you to learn from.

If you're only interest is getting rid of Trump because he personally offends and after that is done you plan to go back to sleep believing America is led by people that aren't corrupt, beholden to foreign nations, and generally do lots of things that are publically available for you to read that are against your interests and values, then have at it. Join the vast majority of Americans ignoring the real reasons why a 9/11 terrorist attack happens or why we're enriching nations that are supposedly against everything we stand for and oppressing their people making them hate us for supporting dictatorial regimes in their nation for money. But don't be surprised when this crap keeps happening and your children or children's children keep on with this murderous push for power fueled by lies and propaganda.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby Aseahawkfan » Sat Oct 26, 2019 5:52 pm

c_hawkbob wrote:And at least 10 of them already had credentials to be there. This was pure made for TV grandstanding, nothing more.


Just like a bunch of Dems have seen Trumps financial records and had plenty of access to the Mueller information. It's all BS grandstanding trying to score points with their bases and push their agenda. Only people dug in on each side would believe otherwise.
Aseahawkfan
Legacy
 
Posts: 8222
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:38 am

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Sat Oct 26, 2019 7:18 pm

c_hawkbob wrote:And at least 10 of them already had credentials to be there. This was pure made for TV grandstanding, nothing more.


Aseahawkfan wrote:Just like a bunch of Dems have seen Trumps financial records and had plenty of access to the Mueller information. It's all BS grandstanding trying to score points with their bases and push their agenda. Only people dug in on each side would believe otherwise.


I gotta side with Cbob on this one. The R's had their people on that committee. It's been SOP for years to first interview witnesses behind closed doors before deciding to put them front and center in a public hearing. Even Lindsey Graham was for closed door sessions when it involved an investigation into Bill Clinton's misdeeds. Their move was all about promoting a false premise in order to rally the troops.

As far as the Dem's previous behavior goes, of course, they're hypocritical, just like when they withheld Dr. Ford's testimony from the judiciary committee chairman in the Kavanaugh hearings. Both parties do their share of grandstanding. It's what they do. But as I've said many times before, two wrongs don't make a right. In this particular example, the R's are dead wrong.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby LTH » Thu Oct 31, 2019 1:18 pm

Tulsi Gabbard is the only one really telling the truth. and she is getting hammered by her own party because the establishment wants to keep the war machine going... :roll: doesn't really matter if you are a Republican or Democrat there is an agenda running both party's that is controlled by the Military industrial complex... The media is controlled by this agenda... You can't believe anything that the Media says hardly anymore. everything they say has to be researched...who has time to do that? there is no election integrity anymore... our rights are being slowly taken away...

I support Tulsi because she is the only one who has the guts to stand up to the establishment..

https://www.facebook.com/10531344750148 ... 8174295149



LTH
LTH
Legacy
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 2:26 pm

Re: Democrat party candidates for POTUS

Postby RiverDog » Thu Oct 31, 2019 2:38 pm

LTH wrote:Tulsi Gabbard is the only one really telling the truth. and she is getting hammered by her own party because the establishment wants to keep the war machine going... :roll: doesn't really matter if you are a Republican or Democrat there is an agenda running both party's that is controlled by the Military industrial complex... The media is controlled by this agenda... You can't believe anything that the Media says hardly anymore. everything they say has to be researched...who has time to do that? there is no election integrity anymore... our rights are being slowly taken away...

I support Tulsi because she is the only one who has the guts to stand up to the establishment..

https://www.facebook.com/10531344750148 ... 8174295149



LTH


Hey, LTH! Glad to see you're dipping your toes into The Jungle. Careful, though, we've had several posters get upset and leave because they couldn't take the heat and a couple that got banned due to their behavior in here.

I haven't researched Gabbert very much. There's so many Dems in the race that it's impossible to keep up with what each one of them stand for. If she ever gets up to 10% in the polls, I'll probably check her out. I do know that I like her bio and the way she reacted to Hillary's completely unjustified attack on her regarding Gabbard being a stooge for the Russians, something I'll never understand. It's almost as if Hillary is trying to rationalize her 2016 defeat. Gabbard would be a good candidate for VP if one of the Dem males like Biden or Bernie get the nomination.

As far as your comments regarding both parties being controlled by the military industrial complex, I don't agree. Like all special interest groups, the military and their private industry partners have their people in Congress, particularly those that represent districts where there's a lot of defense employment, but I don't feel it's to the degree where they control both parties. It's certainly no more influence than various unions have over the Dems or the NRA's influence over the R's.
User avatar
RiverDog
Legacy
 
Posts: 23995
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Kennewick, WA, 99338

PreviousNext

Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests