c_hawkbob wrote:Jeebus Obi, it was the first game of the year, the least reliable indicator of how you team is of the whole year ... take a breath.
I thought this was another sarcastic 1-0 is a disaster type of thread, but it seems Obi was serious.
obiken wrote:Okay, you guys pissed me off, here it is: I was serious. There is NO team in the next 7 games that have a chance in beating NE as long as Brady stays upright. They have a clear path to the Ravens.
idhawkman wrote:We are now 2-0 and we have NO coming to Seattle next week most likely without Brees. I'm now waiting for the Devasted thread....
idhawkman wrote:We are now 2-0 and we have NO coming to Seattle next week most likely without Brees. I'm now waiting for the Devasted thread....
NorthHawk wrote:NO will be different without Brees. I wonder if they will start Hill over Bridgewater to see if he is the heir apparent to Brees.
If he does well, he might be like Steve Young who's play which made it possible to move Montana. For sure, Hill's athleticism
adds another dimension for our D to plan for, and their Offense might be a lot different because of it, but in the end it's still
about hitting, tackling, making plays, and imposing your will on their Offense.
obiken wrote:Ok River, I was wrong. The Pats are a good team but its an even bet that the Saints are better. The Pats will lose games. I was really overly enthralled over the Pats. Sorry!
Hawktawk wrote:A win is a win. Hawks are a loss by the 9ers tonight from being in the lead in the division ,tied for HFA throughout in the NFC, I guess actually NO has the tiebreaker but still, looking at our early schedule I'll take 4-1 and a QB as hot as anyone in the league, a back as good as anyone in the league when he hangs onto the ball and a defense not yet the sum of its parts and were 4-1. Pretty good season so far IMO![]()
![]()
Aseahawkfan wrote:If our defense can improve, we have a good shot at a run this year.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 50 guests