Hawktawk wrote:Locker was kind of in the same vein as Luck in terms of walking away with seemingly plenty of football playing years left although not the talent. I dunno, the money is so ridiculous now that any top flight player who took care of their money for a few years could do the same thing.
As a lifelong blue collar guy, first in golf now in manufacturing who doesn't miss work sick, hurt, tired, missed 3 days with a heart attack and 3 more with a GI bleed, skipped doctors appointments to go to work etc I dont get it frankly.
I can't say respect is the word I have for guys who drag up on an organization that has made them wealthy beyond their wildest dreams and a fan base that adores them just because they are in a financial position to do so. Maybe envy would be my word.
In my case starvation being a great motivator coupled with a dad who was ten times tougher than me and instilled a work ethic from hell in me was why I've been how i've been.
Russ has that kind of a work ethic. Luck obviously does not..
Distant wrote:Kinda feel bad for the guy! I have a feeling he will be back in a few years once he is pain free.
Hawktawk wrote:I had the thought Luck might reconsider as well once he gets healthy. When the league is so desperate for talent at the position they called McCown out of retirement and Fitz has a chance to start my guess is Luck will get a few inquiries going forward. My guess is he is done forever.
Maybe its harsh to 1 question his work ethic, how about his spine, mental toughness? You can't sugar coat walking away after being comeback player of the year with huge stats and only 7 years(6 playing ) in the league when you were heralded as the second coming and first overall pick. Hes instantly went from top 10 to a footnote in the history of the league, a quitter.
RiverDog wrote:
But calling him a quitter? That's easy for you to say.
Hawktawk wrote:He quit in his absolute prime. Hence he's a quitter.
Hawktawk wrote:As I've said Im a blue collar guy who never got rewarded much in my bank account who shows up every day, sometimes hurt, sometimes sick, never calls in sick unless I'm in the hospital. I've walked my Talk for 45 years as a working man. I have every right to call out a guy who walks away from a kids game paying him 120 million that Id strap my fat 60 year old @$$ in pads and go play for free if I could right now. Yeah he's a quitter.
Hawktawk wrote:I completely agree with you about his selfish decision making process. He should have done it pre draft. It's clear Reich is stunned and Irsay is pist. Don't sleep on Jacoby Brissett though.
Distant wrote:Funny. The last sentence in your post was almost like mine.
Feez wrote:Hey, Feez, nice to see you again! Great avatar, by the way.
Thanks Riverdog glad to see this place is still up and active. Good to see it's mainly the same folks from back in the PI days.
Hawktalk I agree Luck had to be considering this way before the start of team activities this season. Had he let them know he was half in around the draft he could have given them a chance to minimize his choice somewhat. I have heard he felt the team didn't care about his health so he didn't care about when he announced his retirement I would chalk that up to speculation but the timing of his announcement makes me believe that rumor a little more
RiverDog wrote:By that standard, you can call Jim Brown a quitter, too, along with Michael Jordan, Sandy Koufax, and Bobby Orr. Bjorn Borg retired at age 26 at the top of a non contact sport where there is almost no risk of permanent injury. You might as well call him a quitter, too. There's a lot of very good athletes that, for a variety of reasons, retire at the peak of their careers with lots of tread on the tires.
Aseahawkfan wrote:How you going to include Michael in this? He retired at 33 in a highly physical sport after winning six titles. That's ridiculous. The only guy in your list remotely like Luck is Bjorn Borg. Everyone else retired at their peak when they were about to fall off. I don't see that as quitting at all like Luck. Luck waited until the last minute of an important season and then quit leaving his team in the lurch for a season without even the ability to draft a prospect. He is a bit of a quitter. If he weren't, he would have at least tried to finish the season and bring his best. Then retire at the end of the season when it doesn't screw his team so hard.
Could you imagine how annoying it would be if Russell did this to us? That would piss me off.
RiverDog wrote:Michael Jordan was 33, at the peak of his game, and could easily had played another 3 or 4 years at an all star level. He was in perfect health with very little risk of sustaining a major, life altering injury.
Jim Brown was 29 when he played his last football game. In his final season, he led the league in both rushing and touchdowns scored. He was in perfect health, opted to go into an acting career.
3 of the 4 were roughly the same age as Andrew Luck is.
Although I might somewhat acknowledge your objection as it relates to Orr and Koufax as their retirements were injury related, they are not all that different as Luck missed an entire season due to an injured shoulder and half a season to a lacerated kidney and partially torn abdominal muscle, and Jordan was 3 years older. But you have to factor in the added health risk of playing NFL football vs. hockey and baseball. As much attention as football has gotten for their potential health risks, I can't blame anyone for quitting while they're ahead.
But your objection to my including Jimmy Brown is both uninformed and untenable. Not only were they the same age and playing the same sport, but Brown was healthier and more accomplished than Luck. Brown never missed a game in 9 seasons.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Brown could have played longer, but 9 seasons as an NFL running back playing in that day and age was brutal.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Did any of those guys screw their team by retiring at the start of the season after the draft and free agent signing period? I know Michael didn't. He left his team after giving the fans and team a 6th Championship.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Luck seems like a nice enough guy, but that retirement was pretty lame. Maybe his heart wasn't in the game anymore, but that's not how old school players did it. This retirement at the start of a season and because of getting tired of rehabbing I don't recall of the old school athletes. He hurt his team. All in all just a lame way to go out. I sympathize with Colts fans that were looking forward to a great season. If Luck's heart wasn't into it, he could have retired before the draft.
NorthHawk wrote:That's pretty much general society today in a nutshell. We want our gratification, usually instantly, but we don't think of those that create our enjoyment and their feelings. It's almost as if we think of entertainers/athletes as characters and not people.
RiverDog wrote:As always, Doug Baldwin added some thoughtful perspective to the issue. Here's what he tweeted about his former Stanford teammate's decision to retire:
How dare Luck not sacrifice his body for MY entertainment. Who cares if your shoulder is too messed up to pick up your child. Who cares if your knees are too messed up to play with your kids. Who cares about the quality of YOUR life, what about the quality of MY Sunday's?
RiverDog wrote:It wasn't as brutal as you might think. The season was a lot shorter as they only played 12 and later 14 game seasons with no preseason and limited summer camps. In Brown's days, they had just one playoff game, the NFL Championship game between the eastern and western divisions, and they played it in December. Additionally, players weren't as big, as fast, or as strong. The style of play was a lot different, with the emphasis on running vs. exposing defenseless receivers to vicious hits. Helmets with face masks, which allowed tacklers to use their helmet as a battering ram, had only recently become the norm. It wasn't until the late 60's-70's, when cage face masks started replacing the single bar, Astro turf replaced dormant grass and in some cases, mud fields, and players actually began to work out in the offseason instead of having to work a 40+ hour/week job that the game grew increasingly violent.
I started watching NFL football right at the end of Jimmy Brown's career, and I can personally attest to the fact that the game wasn't nearly as brutal in the 60's as it is today.
I'm not sure what time of year they made their announcements. My sense is that they were all in the offseason. However, it's not unprecedented for a player or coach to all of a sudden give it up. A few years back, there was an NFL player that quit at halftime of a game, and I remember Bobby Petrino quitting his HC job during the season and his announcement to his team consisted of leaving a note on his player's lockers. Those moves were a lot more gutless than Luck's.
NorthHawk wrote:I still think he warned them he was considering it earlier in the year. The Colts were said to be offered some good compensation for Brissette but turned it down quickly. To me that would suggest there was some doubt about him continuing his career.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Maybe so. I don't recall hearing Brown screwed his team with the timing. He wanted to do something else and got out letting the team know in advance.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Does anyone even think well of Petrino? That guy was a chump.
Aseahawkfan wrote:At the end of the day Luck did what he felt was right for him, but I wish these indecisive people would make their decisions at a better time. I don't care that he retires, but the timing was awful. I'm not jumping on the feel bad for Luck bandwagon. Guy was paid millions, he was talked up as the second coming, and he went out in a way that hurt his team. Just not a great way to go out of the game.
RiverDog"}And I might have told you guys this, but I had a friend and teammate that was killed on the playing field during a game in my junior year of high school. I was the one that went in for him when he went down. Not that it has anything to do with this subject.[/quote]
[quote="Aseahawkfan wrote:How did that happen? Football can get brutal. I imagine a bunch of young, testosterone driven kids can do some pretty cruel stuff to each other.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests