I-5 wrote:I didn't have a chance to watch either night, but my question to you is, do you think the country is ready for 4 more yours of autocratic rule?
I-5 wrote:I didn't have a chance to watch either night, but my question to you is, do you think the country is ready for 4 more yours of autocratic rule?
Aseahawkfan wrote:I read up on the debates. I think their plan to provide all immigrants illegally entering the United States health benefits while naturalizing them is going to turn a lot of folks off.
I think they are once again not aware of America's real stance on immigration. I don't think most Americans enjoy having these huge camps on the border and they don't want some pogrom against immigrants like some folks are calling for, but they also don't want the no borders and all immigrants get free stuff for making it to America policy either.
A well-thought out stance on immigration tied to our current economic conditions that isn't used by big corps to globalize the labor pool to drive down wages, but that is still generous and allows us to grow as a nation with a fairly low birth rate is much more palatable than a we don't want any immigrants or a let them all in and give them a ton of taxpayer supported benefits plans. Americans on the whole don't despise immigrants, but they also don't want a bust the border attitude either.
The hate Wall Street ideas are not as relevant as they were 3 years ago. Business is booming and people are making a lot of money. Swing voters aren't usually the unemployed poor of the nation looking to take a bite of Wall Street. Those folks are already in Democratic pockets. Swing voters want to hear intelligent, centrist policy that is good for the nation. When even Yahoo News isn't posting that from the Dems, they may be in trouble.
I-5 wrote:Yes, it was a hyperbole. Lighten up.
However, do you know any president in the modern era since the 2 term limit law was imposed after FDR passed that has ever suggested or even joked about staying on past the second term?
I-5 wrote:Yes, it was a hyperbole. Lighten up.
However, do you know any president in the modern era since the 2 term limit law was imposed after FDR passed that has ever suggested or even joked about staying on past the second term?
I-5 wrote:Yes, it was a hyperbole. Lighten up.
However, do you know any president in the modern era since the 2 term limit law was imposed after FDR passed that has ever suggested or even joked about staying on past the second term?
Aseahawkfan wrote:That healthcare and benefits position for illegal immigrants was about as dumb as I've read. I'm surprised the Dems think that is a smart position, any of them. You wonder why citizenship checks for voting are being pushed hearing trash like that.
burrrton wrote:You're drawing distinctions without a difference, there, chief.
But keep laughing this guy to another term, then congratulate yourself.
But the Dem's position on immigration is far more reasonable than Trump's
I agree that it's a rather far fetched scenario and I'm not subscribing to it, but there is enough evidence that we've seen over the past 3 years in the form of Trump's eccentric behavior and deep fake technology that it's a bit more than just some whacky suggestion out of Area 51.
But the Dem's position on immigration is far more reasonable than Trump's
burrrton wrote:Not even close. His position is wrong, theirs is off-the-charts bananas.
...but it is a radical idea.
...but it is a radical idea.
burrrton wrote:Ya think?
RiverDog wrote:Don't overwork yourself in crafting your responses...
RiverDog wrote:Agreed, that was an obscene proposal regarding rights for illegals. Trash is the nicest thing that can be said about it.
But the Dem's position on immigration is far more reasonable than Trump's, who has declared that the country is "full" when schools are closing for lack of students and we have more job openings BY FAR than we have unemployed.
RiverDog wrote:The "off the charts bananas" position is a $25B border wall that will do next to nothing in addressing the vast majority of illegal aliens and illicit goods entering the country.
But I do agree that some of the proposals made by Dems go too far, like de-criminalizing illegal border crossings. It's not "open borders" that Trump claims as under their proposal they would still be prosecuted civil court, but it is a radical idea.
What they should be doing is increasing INS staff, immigration judges, and handling facilities in order to better expedite the huge backlog that was created in part by Trump's zero tolerance policy. We need to allow a certain number of deserving immigrants as we have a severe labor shortage that if not addressed, will begin to be a drag on our economy. The birth rate in the USA is continuing to decline and there will not be not enough native born Americans to fill job openings that currently way outnumber those that are unemployed. I just read where the average age of a licensed electrician is 55 years old and demand for that occupation is expected to increase by 9% over 10 years.
Hawktawk wrote:I didn't really watch more than snippets of the debates but watched all the coverage afterwards. Day one was a dud. All the progressives gushing over Warren must want another 4 years of Trump.An annoying policy wonk nag who sounds like an angry schoolteacher lecturing her class. Beto where did you go. Julian Castro? if that's having a good night hello?The nominee will come from the second night. It will be interesting to see how new polls look for Biden after an uneven lackluster [performance and getting schooled by Kamela Harris.
Mayor Pete would be the next president of the united states if he weren't gay and married.
I say that not out of homophobia as i've crossed that bridge long ago but out of pragmatic political calculation. I could be wrong because hes smart as hell, has great answers for the questions and has served his country with honor. hes wise beyond his years.
Now Harris was to me the overwhelming breakout star and I think polls will show it. Its also telling that Trump jumped in to defend Biden against her attacks on twitter. He may be a complete tool(well is, not may be) but I think he saw the flaws of Biden and the danger of Kamela Harris, a centrist candidate with a record of law and order, attractive, extremely well spoken and in command of the issues. And shes already on the record as saying she favors his prosecution after he leaves office. As the former AG of the state of California she isnt just another politician talking out of her arse. She knows the laws hes broken. I think it would be delicious seeing a strong woman cutting him to ribbons on the debate stage as his red face and fat head looks ready to explode, his twitter blizzards increasingly unhinged.He wont bully her.
But note to the dems, People aren't giving you a chance because of policy. They sort of like the economy etc for the most part . They are giving you a shot because of Donald Trump. As George Will said his numbers have no room to move, but yours do. Keep pushing their wackadoodle fringe ideas and you might just dumb down the vote enough to give yourselves and all of us 4 more years of the adult day care.
ooops! Too late.
ooops! Too late.
burrrton wrote:
There's still over a year to go, ID- I wouldn't be counting your chickens yet.
RiverDog wrote:Agreed, that was an obscene proposal regarding rights for illegals. Trash is the nicest thing that can be said about it.
But the Dem's position on immigration is far more reasonable than Trump's, who has declared that the country is "full" when schools are closing for lack of students and we have more job openings BY FAR than we have unemployed.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Where are you getting this schools are closing idea?
Aseahawkfan wrote:Where are you getting the employment information as well? As far as I know employment issues have more to do with America not producing folks with the necessary skills for the economy, not because of immigration because of a poorly educated population in specific areas like computer programming and other technical skills. We have tons of psychology, philosophy, and liberal arts degrees and a dearth of scientific and technical degrees. We're not going to get that from Latin America.
burrrton wrote:A dropoff in college enrollment is being called a "crisis"?? LOL.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Where are you getting the employment information as well? As far as I know employment issues have more to do with America not producing folks with the necessary skills for the economy, not because of immigration because of a poorly educated population in specific areas like computer programming and other technical skills. We have tons of psychology, philosophy, and liberal arts degrees and a dearth of scientific and technical degrees. We're not going to get that from Latin America.
RiverDog wrote:
I thought it was common knowledge, but here you go!
It’s official: The US economy doesn’t have enough workers.
For nearly a year now, the number of open jobs each month has been higher than the number of people looking for work — the first time that’s happened since the Department of Labor began tracking job turnover two decades ago.
At the end of January, the US economy had 7.6 million unfilled jobs, but only 6.5 million people were looking for work, according to data released Friday by the US Department of Labor. This was the 11th straight month that the number of job openings was higher than the number of job seekers. And each month, the gap has grown.
Nearly ever industry now has a labor shortage, but here’s the twist: Employers are having a harder time filling blue-collar positions than professional positions that require a college education.
https://www.vox.com/2019/3/18/18270916/ ... workers-us
It is most likely becasue the colleges have priced themselves out of middle america's price range.
burrrton wrote:You need to be careful quoting Vox (aka BridgeToGaza.com), but yeah- I think we're certainly in need of workers right now.
idhawkman wrote:And yet, how do you explain all the homeless spilling over into our parks and streets in most every major city? Are they not capable of meaningful work or has the illegal immigrants taken all their jobs?
burrrton wrote:A dropoff in college enrollment is being called a "crisis"?? LOL.
The drop off in college enrollment isn't a problem, it's a symptom of a problem. It is an indication of the shrinking pool of available workers.
The bottom line is that due to the steady decline in the birth rate, there aren't going to be enough American born citizens from the 18-35 age group that are needed to pay into group health insurance without taking out. The ratio of worker to retiree is going to continue to get worse and make Medicare and Social Security even more unsustainable. We have a need for young, healthy workers, particularly in those occupations that do not require a college education, like truck drivers, electricians, health care workers, etc.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests