jshawaii22 wrote:I think most of the pundits had us overdrafting him be at least 2 rounds. He played up to that 3rd round 'pick' level about what we expected.
Another one of the JS stretch picks that boggle our minds. Not to say he'll never play up to that pick, but he's not even in Carson's league right now, except for a couple of glimpses of it last year.
jshawaii22 wrote:I think most of the pundits had us overdrafting him be at least 2 rounds. He played up to that 3rd round 'pick' level about what we expected.
Another one of the JS stretch picks that boggle our minds. Not to say he'll never play up to that pick, but he's not even in Carson's league right now, except for a couple of glimpses of it last year.
jshawaii22 wrote:I think most of the pundits had us overdrafting him be at least 2 rounds. He played up to that 3rd round 'pick' level about what we expected.
Another one of the JS stretch picks that boggle our minds. Not to say he'll never play up to that pick, but he's not even in Carson's league right now, except for a couple of glimpses of it last year.
obiken wrote:I think Penny will improve this year remember, he had a broken finger a lot of the season, and the biggest jump is in the 2nd year.
Good read on him: https://www.seahawks.com/news/seahawks- ... ow-to-be-a
NorthHawk wrote:There were a couple of things involved in the thinking about taking Penny when they did.
The first was Carson was coming off an injury and nobody knew how well he would stand'
up to punishment in the NFL with his running style. The second was the run game was
anemic the prior couple of years and they needed to upgrade it badly. With Barkley going
early, they had to take a good RB early and Penny was at the top of their list (rightly or
wrongly). So I think the debate inside the team might have been do we wait and get
a player who we think is a lesser RB and hope he is better than we think or do we take
the guy at the top of our list now? It was a tough place to be in and they went with what
they thought were the best odds.
I don't think Carson will ever play 16 games and I doubt he has much more than a 4 or 5
year career with how hard he runs, so a good RB is an absolute necessity.
NorthHawk wrote:Carson is the better RB as of last year. It remains to be seen if he will be
throughout 2019 as the inevitable injury bug hits him. We need a solid RB
to replace him and take away the starting job, or at least challenge for it.
I don't have a problem with them taking a RB with the first pick.
They identified a need and filled it. That's what the draft is for.
He's going to have to beat out Carson as the workhorse of our offense if he's to live up to the expectations of being a #1 draft choice. IMO you don't burn a first round pick and your first pick in a draft on a player and not expect him to at least be good enough to start.
He's going to have to beat out Carson as the workhorse of our offense if he's to live up to the expectations of being a #1 draft choice. IMO you don't burn a first round pick and your first pick in a draft on a player and not expect him to at least be good enough to start.
obiken wrote:I agree Riv, but come on, its Pete Carroll we're talking about here, rounds don't matter to this guy. He can always pick up a good WR in the 6th round and turn him into an All Pro DB! The problem is you usually never find All-Pro OLineman in the 5th round. I think Penny will have a good 2nd year, but not displace Carson. Its a good insurance policy.
NorthHawk wrote:In other news, it looks like Kendricks might be available all year.
I sure hope so.
https://www.profootballrumors.com/2019/ ... -kendricks
NorthHawk wrote:This line is what stands out for me:
John P. Gilbert of FieldGulls.com observes that Kendricks’ co-defendant, Damilare Sonoiki — whose sentencing is scheduled for July 15 — petitioned the court for permission to travel in May so that he could seek employment. And as Gilbert points out, it would be curious if Sonoiki filed that petition in search of two-month employment prior to a court appearance that could theoretically send him to jail for a significant stretch, so it sounds as if Sonoiki believes he can avoid prison time entirely.
NorthHawk wrote:Is it unusual for 2 people convicted of the same crime to get different sentences?
It would seem odd to me, but I guess you never know.
jshawaii22 wrote:more importantly since many states and the feds have very specific guidelines, are the past history of each accused. If someone with a prior felony and someone who is clean both conspire or each, say, robs a restaurant with a gun, there is noway that they get the same sentence and the person with no record will probably not go to jail, as long as that said person comes clean in front of the judge.
That's true, but if I remember correctly, neither Kendricks or his partner in crime had any prior felony convictions, so there is reason to believe that they would receive similar sentences or avoid jail time altogether.
That's true, but if I remember correctly, neither Kendricks or his partner in crime had any prior felony convictions, so there is reason to believe that they would receive similar sentences or avoid jail time altogether.
jshawaii22 wrote:RD, I think in this case, I'll bet that right now, Kendricks has agreed to or will testify against the broker who brought him into the scheme. I would think that delays at this point is an attempt to mitigate the charges for Kendricks, which I think Pete spilled the beans by his smirky comment a few days ago.
Also in his defense, he came clean right away, as compared to the rich b**** Martha Stewart who fought it all the way to jail.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests