jshawaii22 wrote:I love this time of year. Everyone of our draft picks has 'potential' and they were all steals at the draft. While we'd like to compare him to other HOF receivers before his first practice in pads, Metcalf was passed on by 59 other teams, including a couple times by the Seahawks... is he the diamond in the rough or just another 6' 4" 220lb kid who can't run routes and drops passes, which was his MO of why he dropped from the top 10 into the 60's. it wasn't drugs or DV or an arrest, which makes up most of these stories, either. I HOPE I'M WRONG, TOO. HOF? Maybe... you never know.
Arizona got the steal of the draft a couple years ago with a pot-head Ndemche (sp) - he was supposed to be great, he doesn't start and doesn't play much.
Why? It's called a crap-shoot. The whole NFL draft is a crapshoot. But it's fun to dream what could be.
4 To Watch: If you take away Flowers and Dickson who are already 'star's or on their way, my 4 are Poona and Dissley are the best two prospects that we have coming out of last year. DJ and John Ursua, from UH! Go Warriors - same type as Edelman and other inside receivers. I just have a feeling he makes the team with a very crowded receiver room.
jshawaii22 wrote:I love this time of year. Everyone of our draft picks has 'potential' and they were all steals at the draft. While we'd like to compare him to other HOF receivers before his first practice in pads, Metcalf was passed on by 59 other teams, including a couple times by the Seahawks... is he the diamond in the rough or just another 6' 4" 220lb kid who can't run routes and drops passes, which was his MO of why he dropped from the top 10 into the 60's. it wasn't drugs or DV or an arrest, which makes up most of these stories, either. I HOPE I'M WRONG, TOO. HOF? Maybe... you never know.
Arizona got the steal of the draft a couple years ago with a pot-head Ndemche (sp) - he was supposed to be great, he doesn't start and doesn't play much.
Why? It's called a crap-shoot. The whole NFL draft is a crapshoot. But it's fun to dream what could be.
4 To Watch: If you take away Flowers and Dickson who are already 'star's or on their way, my 4 are Poona and Dissley are the best two prospects that we have coming out of last year. DJ and John Ursua, from UH! Go Warriors - same type as Edelman and other inside receivers. I just have a feeling he makes the team with a very crowded receiver room.
Hawktawk wrote:Not to cast aspersions, not accusing and hoping this is way off base but There just aren't many 6'3" 225 lb men who have basically 0 % body fat, pipes like a weightlifter and run 4.3 in the 40.
I hope as Holmgren said so famously of Shawn Springs that the guy isn't taking "aspirin". Maybe it was the neck injury or something, some unknown except to scouts attitude issue but why did a guy projected as top 10 go last pick of the second? I hope hes the next coming of Julio Jones, Mega tron or Micheal Irvin for sure.
RiverDog wrote:
The raps on Metcalf are his route running, game experience, and injury history. He also has shown traits of being somewhat of a diva, his chest baring being one example. Hopefully it's just a maturity issue and becoming a professional cures him of that tendency.
mykc14 wrote:I’m definitely not going to spend a lot of time defending Metcalf. My expectations for him, especially in year one, is lower than most but I don’t know where you keep coming up with the Diva talk, River, especially using him taking his shirt off to meet PC as an example.
idhawkman wrote:I thought I saw a video post by PC after some of the OTAs where he said he was pleased with Metcalf and that his route tree was thorough and full. Maybe I misunderstood it or what else would we expect PC to say, right?
idhawkman wrote:This time of year it is all posturing but then again, isn't that the case all year round?
Don't want to tell the other teams your weaknesses so they can exploit them. Because I'm the eternal homer for the Seahaws though, I'm hoping he is as good as these recent reports. So for me, for right now, this is good news. We'll have to wait and see in the preseason if it was bluster or fact. Go Hawks!!!
RiverDog wrote:That's fine for you, but I like to keep my powder dry for when the rubber hits the road in the regular season games. Even preseason games don't excite me much as the primary objective for teams is player evaluation and keeping all their starters healthy. I've read too many of these glowing, optimistic reports coming out of training camps that it's almost to the point that I don't believe a word of them.
There's plenty of bad news out there, too. One of the negative comments about Metcalf that I read in a blog was that he's not as fast as his 40 time would suggest, that good CB's can match him stride-for-stride. Plus the multiple reports about dropped passes has me concerned. Steve Largent spoiled me a long time ago in that I now expect all NFL WR's to catch passes. The last 4 months of 2004 had to be the most stressful 4 months in my life with DJack and KRob having a contest on who could drop the most catchable passes.
So we'll see. At the very least he'll be a player to watch.
NorthHawk wrote:TC and Pre-season are completely different from the regular season.
So for WR's, I look for if they have the athleticism, do they stand out in a good way,
do they have game speed equal to the Combine results, since the Defenses are basic
do they dominate in 1 on ones and if a team uses a simple zone defense, do they
understand what they are supposed to do, and finally, can they catch the ball both
when all alone and in traffic when expected to be hit.
idhawkman wrote:Regarding "good CBs" keeping up with him, that is fine. I'm not concerned about that because we also have Lockett and D'arbough. (I probably messed up the spelling of his name). For instance, most defenses don't have 3 "good CBs" on the team. So which one is manned up against one of our recievers? If they leave the so-so DB on Metcalf, watch him run and leave the dude in the dirt. Same for Lockett and D'arbough. One of them is going to be able to run down the field with a better than 50% chance of getting open. Especially if the oline is opening holes for the RB to pound the ball.
That all said, I'm stoked for this year's possibilities and I'm pretty sure you are hopeful even though you are more of a Missouri kind of guy where you say, "SHOW ME"! Right?
RiverDog wrote:Keep in mind that the comment about "good CB's" keeping up with Metcalf was made about him going up against a good college DB. At the NFL level, Metcalf is going to have to do something else to create separation other than run by DB's, especially if there's any truth in the comments I made above about agility and failing to "sell" DB's on short routes. John Ross was the fastest WR in the 2017 draft and he hasn't done squat.
jshawaii22 wrote:From PFF -- in an article about rookie WR's and who landed on the 'best' team for their skills -
Best Route: Go
Widely documented that he lacked a full route tree coming out of Ole Miss, Metcalf’s vertical route tree is something to behold. Within that was his ability on go routes and 100% of his go route receptions ended in a first down or touchdown last year. He averaged 44.7 yards per go route in 2018 and scored three touchdowns on such, coming down with one of the nation’s more impressive highlight reels in the process.
Luckily for Metcalf, he landed in Seattle with a quarterback in Russell Wilson who has been as good as it gets when targeting the go route. Since 2016, Wilson has completed 39 go routes — tied for the most among quarterbacks in that span — for 1,245 yards and 28 big-time throws. His completion percentage of 39.4% on these routes ranks first among the 24 quarterbacks with at least 50 attempts since 2016, and his 103.0 passer rating on these throws ranks third.
NorthHawk wrote:I've always maintained the Draft is about selecting potential.
There's a risk/reward calculation for every pick, and I think that at
pick #64 the needle pointed firmly at the reward side, and in some
minds an extreme reward.
We'll see how it all plays out.
NorthHawk wrote:I've always maintained the Draft is about selecting potential.
There's a risk/reward calculation for every pick, and I think that at
pick #64 the needle pointed firmly at the reward side, and in some
minds an extreme reward.
We'll see how it all plays out.
c_hawkbob wrote:He's (Metcalf) a top 10 talent with a late round body of work. By almost all accounts a steal at the bottom of the second. I think he was the pick of the draft.
NorthHawk wrote:He should have some idea of what it takes to make it in the NFL with his father being
a Guard at Ole Miss and his grandfather being Terry Metcalf (who was born in Seattle).
But his injury history might be an issue as he also had a broken foot in College.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests