NorthHawk wrote:I wonder how many of these players will stick and how many UFA's will make the team.
I'm sure not all of the listed additions will be here at the start of the season, and that's
good because it means competition is the determining factor.
RiverDog wrote:It's a little bit concerning that we lost more than we've gained in terms of quality, specifically Clark and Thomas. But there are a couple that if they can stay healthy, like Iupati and Ziggy, that could end up paying huge dividends.
RiverDog wrote:It's a little bit concerning that we lost more than we've gained in terms of quality, specifically Clark and Thomas. But there are a couple that if they can stay healthy, like Iupati and Ziggy, that could end up paying huge dividends.
idhawkman wrote:I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you on this but I don't see losing Earl as a huge loss simply for the fact that he's been hurt or MIA for much of the last 2 seasons. Clark is definitely a loss though. Doug's contributions and key catches will be a huge loss, too. I'm not sure how much of a cancer he would have been in the locker room after reading some of the articles lately - especially the inuendos that Sherman threw out there.
I'm thinking the gains this year (I'm including KJ and Fluker in this) are more than the losses as a whole.
RiverDog wrote:
We never really replaced Earl, either, and he still has some mileage left on him, so it's a big loss, or at least that's my take.
All I'm talking about is roster additions/subtractions, not resignings that were already on the roster, like Russell, KJ, Fluker, Fant, Jefferson, et al.
RiverDog wrote:We never really replaced Earl, either, and he still has some mileage left on him, so it's a big loss, or at least that's my take.
idhawkman wrote:I get your point. I just think that even though we didn't replace ET, our defense didn't suffer all that badly after he went down.
idhawkman wrote:I know you weren't couting the resignings but I put them in because they were scheduled to leave. Not all that you listed, e.g RW since he had more time on his contract but Fluker and KJ especially were huge resignings in my mind. That's why I put them in.
idhawkman wrote:Well I hope you are wrong that we will be worse this year than last. As you pointed out, ET wasn't there for 12 games (I think he also held out a couple games, too.) so losing him didn't effect the overall performance of our defense from last year at all. That's not a knock on his overall talent in any way he just wasn't there to contribute. Adding KJ back on the roster since he missed many games last year is a big upgrade over last year's overall performance. If Kendrycks can play this year it will be one of the LB corps in the league.
All together, I think we are better on defense this year than we were last year even with Clark being replaced by Ziggy.
jshawaii22 wrote:I see the offseason as Even so far, but only If our wounded come back for at least the last 2/3 of the season -- Ziggy, Iupati, and Dissly and Kendricks stays out of prison, then we actually did a good job as far as balancing the loss of some top line talent like Clark and Coleman. ET was already 'gone' so it's a different kind of talent loss.
On the field, Clark was the biggest loss, but losing Justin Coleman might be the hardest to replace.
Including the draft, there is absolutely no doubt that we are reforming the roster with higher quality backups (except QB!) and that will help over the course of the year.
We'll never have another LOB, but the new kids did a pretty good job last year. We need to see the new nickle and dime packages this fall. It could make or break us.
jshawaii22 wrote:I see the offseason as Even so far, but only If our wounded come back for at least the last 2/3 of the season -- Ziggy, Iupati, and Dissly and Kendricks stays out of prison, then we actually did a good job as far as balancing the loss of some top line talent like Clark and Coleman. ET was already 'gone' so it's a different kind of talent loss.
On the field, Clark was the biggest loss, but losing Justin Coleman might be the hardest to replace.
Including the draft, there is absolutely no doubt that we are reforming the roster with higher quality backups (except QB!) and that will help over the course of the year.
We'll never have another LOB, but the new kids did a pretty good job last year. We need to see the new nickle and dime packages this fall. It could make or break us.
jshawaii22 wrote:I've never heard of him. Wikipedia: He was drafted by Miami and stayed for 3 years and then traded for a 7th Round pick to Cleveland and they traded him to AZ for the 6th round pick. Released and signed as FA by Denver... who released him. Then he signed as FA with the Seahawks.
If you're right and this 'quality' of player becomes a major cog on our passing formation defences (nickelback) then like I said, this position will make or break us this year. The third CB in the current NFL will be uber important to cover slot receivers. Probably on the field 60-65% of the plays.
NorthHawk wrote:There will be good DL cut this off season and maybe one or two will end up here.
It should be a prime destination to go to considering Pete is a Defensive coach
and we need help along the DL. It's a good place for a "show what you have left"
type of contract or maybe a longer term if they are younger.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests