NorthHawk wrote:According to Schefter, he might miss the first month of the season.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... of-season/
NorthHawk wrote:Here's an argument that says we made out pretty good by trading Clark.
I'm not sure I agree with it as I tend to believe that the team who gets the
best player wins a trade. It'll take a couple of years to fully understand
how well we did.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... -and-more/
jshawaii22 wrote:I'm amazed when you put on paper what we had a week before the draft, and what one trade, albeit it was sad to lose Clark, all became:
One 'new' First
One 'new' Second next year
and it led to moving down and going from 4 picks to 11...
and open up cap space to sign Ziggy and others and possibly BWags.
I still would of traded both my firsts with the JETS for Williams to anchor the DLine, but it is what it is. Not the way the team operates.
The article didn't factor Russell's contract into the equation, which makes the trade look a lot better than the alternative, which would have meant dedicating 25% of our cap space to two players, nor did he account for the fact that we only had 4 draft picks prior to the trade.
As you stated, it will take several years to accurately assess the Clark trade. But at this point, I really like it.
RiverDog wrote:I like our offseason moves, too, but we have to keep in mind that it's all on paper.
Hawk Sista wrote:60 million?? Are you sure? I heard yesterday that it was 20 after the four we signed this week. If we have 60, I’d sight Bobby and J Reed now and bring in Nick Reed + maybe Earl Mitchell.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests