RiverDog wrote:
I'm not ready to go "leaps and bounds better", but he was much improved. Having a decent guard next to him may account for some of his improvement, but it doesn't help keep him from committing false starts, and he still ranked 3rd in the league in that category last season. I'm OK with him starting, but everything else equal (like injuries), he's definitely the weak link in the group and a position that is a prime candidate for an upgrade.
idhawkman wrote:I'm not ready to go "leaps and bounds better", but he was much improved. Having a decent guard next to him may account for some of his improvement, but it doesn't help keep him from committing false starts, and he still ranked 3rd in the league in that category last season. I'm OK with him starting, but everything else equal (like injuries), he's definitely the weak link in the group and a position that is a prime candidate for an upgrade.
RiverDog wrote:That's fair. I don't recall complaining about his false starts that much toward the end of last year though. Maybe I'm being a homer but I'm thinking he's going to be a good fit this year. (At least I'm hoping for it in any case.)
RiverDog wrote:Last season, Ifedi had 6 false starts in 17 games, tied for 3rd with 2 other players for all positions. That's a lot better than his 2017 flags, in which he had 20 penalties in 16 games, 9 for false starts league highs in both categories. Despite the improvement, he was still the 9th most penalized OT in the league last season, so it's not like the problem has completely gone away.
The one thing that Ifedi has going for him is that he's a returning veteran and has worked with this group, the OL coach, and the OC for a full season now, and as you know, continuity is as important on the OL as any other position group in the game, so I don't think your optimism stems from being an unreasonable homer, rather it's grounded in some very good logic.
idhawkman wrote:I think attributions for the quotes in the last thread were reversed.
So at number 9, that's bottom 1/6th of the league figuring that there are 32 teams and 2 OTs per team. That's much better than being dead last the season before and I don't know how many of those came in the first half vs. second half of the season. That would be interesting info.
RiverDog wrote:
Here's my source:
http://www.nflpenalties.com/position/of ... ?year=2018
It's a good site with sortable stats for players, teams, season, types of penalties, etc. In summary, Ifedi was horrible by any measure in 2017, significantly better but still room for improvement in 2018.
Of course, penalties aren't the only measure of an OT's worth, but his performance in 2017 was completely unacceptable and was the primary reason why I was so down on him.
There are certain things in life that pi$$ me off, and jumping offside ranks up there with wet toilet paper and smart asses.
idhawkman wrote:yeah, so I was right, he only had one false start in november and one in december. He had 3 in sept. and 1 in oct but went from Oct 7 to Nov 15 without a false start. I have to go look at when FLuker got hurt to see if that had any impact. 3 of the false starts came with Fluker in and 3 when he was out.
Not much else that can be gleened from the stats but it feels like he got much better toward the end of the season. Especially when you consider his first 4 false starts came in the first 5 games. He did add 4 holds and one unsportsmanlike but we don't know what was happening with RW when the holds happened so it is unfair to judge those.
RiverDog wrote:The holding calls, although obviously more impactful, don't bother me as much as the false starts, especially when you have a scrambling quarterback like Russell Wilson compounded by the fact that Russell has had a well known tendency to hold onto the ball too long. Besides, holding calls are much more subjective than false starts. You could call a holding penalty on almost every passing play.
It's the false starts, along with unsportsmanlike and some personal foul penalties, that irritate me the most about an individual player as IMO they are entirely preventable. Ifedi's always been heavily penalized, and last season was the first time in the past 3 years that I've seen some improvement.
Penalties has also been one of my main beefs about Pete's coaching style. His teams are notoriously heavily penalized. Although last season was our best performance in that category (ranked 9th), every single year he's been here we've been in the top 10.
NorthHawk wrote:In other news, the Seahawks have initiated negotiations with Bobby Wagner.
Apparently he is representing himself, but I hope he gets a fair deal for both.
https://www.profootballrumors.com/2019/ ... sion-talks
And on the lesser news front, CJ Prosise has undergone abdominal surgery.
https://www.profootballrumors.com/2019/ ... s-seahawks
NorthHawk wrote:Apparently Prosise has only gained 129 yards in 2 years. I feel badly for him because he has so much potential
but if you can't get on the field, you can't contribute.
So with Davis gone and Prosise always injured and McKissic coming back from a serious injury, I can see us
looking at another RB in the draft.
RiverDog wrote:Mychal Kendricks' sentencing hearing was pushed back again. It was scheduled for April 4th, now it could be as late as mid July before we find out about his availability:
Seattle linebacker Kendricks learned that his sentencing hearing for insider trading has been pushed back from April 4th until some time in the future. Kendricks’ hearing with U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania may happen in mid-July now as that is when Kendricks’ co-conspirator, Damilare Sonoiki, is being sentenced. It would make sense to have the two near the same date. This is the second time Kendricks’ hearing has been pushed back as his original hearing was scheduled for late January.
https://12thmanrising.com/2019/03/27/se ... kendricks/
RiverDog wrote:I'm encouraged by this news, and I hope it's true. It forces both sides to show their hands early, and if Pete and John don't think that we can remain competitive by meeting Russell's demands, then we have plenty of time to explore the possibility of a trade. If they can come to an agreement, then we don't have to go through this daily will-he-or-won't-he Chinese water torture for the next two years.
jshawaii22 wrote:I think we should look at signing Bobby and Clark now --
NorthHawk wrote:Back to the Wilson topic, he clarified that if he doesn't get a deal by the 15th, he
will shut down negotiations until after the season but will be at all team activities.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... -workouts/
NorthHawk wrote:Back to the Wilson topic, he clarified that if he doesn't get a deal by the 15th, he
will shut down negotiations until after the season but will be at all team activities.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... -workouts/
c_hawkbob wrote:Which is basically what he did last negotiation. Difference being he used the beginning of TC as his end date rather than the beginning of off season activities. He's just wanting to maintain his focus on the field.
RiverDog wrote:
That's one interpretation. Another interpretation that I've seen circulating is that it's part of a power play for Russell to leave the team. In other words, Russell may be trying to flush out the Hawks best offer, and if it's not good enough, then he and the Hawks could start working on a trade.
April 15th is not only prior to team activities, it's 10 days before the draft, more than enough time to work a deal. There's been a lot of speculation about the Giants trading of OBJ, that it was designed to clear cap space and acquire draft capital in order to make a run at Russell. After all, Russell's wife has reportedly indicated her desire to live in the Big Apple.
Now please don't kill the messenger! I am simply pointing out a possibility, I'm not advocating it. My first choice is that we resign Russell.
Anthony wrote:As to the SPECULATION that its a power play, as of now Wilsons team has made it clear they want to be here. Until we hear otherwise there is no reason to worry.
NorthHawk wrote:Power play doesn't necessarily mean he wants to leave, rather it means he's putting pressure on the
team to make a deal before they are ready. It's a negotiation strategy, but it also means he's thinking
about going the FT route like Cousins did and he got fully guaranteed $128 Million. The scenario
that played out with Cousins must be part of the thinking between Wilson and his agent.
NorthHawk wrote:I'm not sure your numbers work. I've read other comments that say if he goes the Tag route
it will cost about $110 Million over 3 years, so that would be the starting point of any
negotiations.
But this is part of the dance. The player and Agent try to pressure the team to get the most
and the team will try to drag it out until it's in their best interest and pressure the player.
At some point something might get done this year, but in the last contract, Wilson wanted
it completed before TC, so it remains to be seen if he's of a like mind or determined to
get the most he can even if it means going the FT route.
jshawaii22 wrote:
Two different thoughts on this. His salary is 17+ million this year, but he CAP # is around $25m, so RW has 3 or 4 years of probable 'cost' that depends on if you use the 17m or the 25m as the basis for the franchise tag and I don't have a clue which way it works.
NorthHawk wrote:Sehawks signed Cassius Marsh to a 1 year deal.
https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2 ... year-deal/
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests