Sox-n-hawks wrote:Since when is wrapping up a d-linemen from behind not holding?
its only a penalty when it is us.
Sox-n-hawks wrote:Since when is wrapping up a d-linemen from behind not holding?
chris98251 wrote:They can't cut guys, that's like the 10th missed cut attempt at a tackle I have seen.
chris98251 wrote:They can't cut guys, that's like the 10th missed cut attempt at a tackle I have seen.
chris98251 wrote:Sack on Wilson, he stepped into that away from Britt. Penalty helped us.
Sox-n-hawks wrote:School yard improv
Sox-n-hawks wrote:This game has a 41-38 feel to it.
More than 27 points and PC teams lose
chris98251 wrote:Britt had the angle on the drop back and he was right there, he stepped up and there was too much separation and the defender just was able to side step and get to Wilson. It was on Wilson. But Moot because of penalty.
chris98251 wrote:This is becoming a trend, late play into the huddle and confusion burning time outs.
again Wilson had no way of knowing he was comming back to block the announcers even said so. so sorry it was not on Wilson at all. if anything on the initial blocker not being able to block.
chris98251 wrote:This is becoming a trend, late play into the huddle and confusion burning time outs.
chris98251 wrote:
Since when do the announcers know jack s*** about anything, your reaching.
Anthony wrote:it amazes me how often they are wide open, running innovative pattens, compared to us.
Sox-n-hawks wrote:
It's the Norton soft zone. Remember pre Gus? Bend but don't break?
chris98251 wrote:Good first half, we are hanging around which many experts didn't expect to happen.
Sox-n-hawks wrote:As always, playing to the level of our opponent.
Sox-n-hawks wrote:As always, playing to the level of our opponent.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests