Sox-n-hawks wrote:I'm not convinced it'll be a beatdown. Something in my gut says the Hawks will show up to play ball.
RiverDog wrote:
And there's good reason for some optimism. We've won our last two in a row during which Russell Wilson has played relatively well by taking care of the ball and not taking stupid sacks, and our running game has begun to show some signs of life. Plus the Rams are not without warts. In their last game, the Vikings, minus their top running back, hung 31 points on them. If we can control the ball and keep the Ram offense on the sidelines, make the most out of our opportunities, and not commit any turnovers, we have a great chance to pull off an upset.
Plus this is a home game, and the 12's will be in full throat.
NorthHawk wrote:On the negative side, the only TE that is fully healthy is Darrell Daniels as Vannett has a lower back injury.
Fant will probably see some action at TE, but how much can we really expect from him besides blocking?
NorthHawk wrote:On the negative side, the only TE that is fully healthy is Darrell Daniels as Vannett has a lower back injury.
Fant will probably see some action at TE, but how much can we really expect from him besides blocking?
NorthHawk wrote:On the negative side, the only TE that is fully healthy is Darrell Daniels as Vannett has a lower back injury.
Fant will probably see some action at TE, but how much can we really expect from him besides blocking?
RiverDog wrote:Minor question, but if Fant plays at TE, is he going to have to change his uniform number? I thought that the NFL had some type of rule preventing eligible receivers from wearing 50's, 60's, and 70's.
chris98251 wrote:Madden can't pound anything, worst blocking FB I have ever seen. Why we still have him is perplexing. But the idea is sound.
c_hawkbob wrote:Minor question, but if Fant plays at TE, is he going to have to change his uniform number? I thought that the NFL had some type of rule preventing eligible receivers from wearing 50's, 60's, and 70's.
I think he'd just have to report as eligible before the play.
c_hawkbob wrote:I think so.
I-5 wrote:I'm impressed with the Seahawks so far hanging...they are showing the ability to run as the last 2 games. So far, no blowout.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 42 guests