RiverDog wrote:How many times do I have to say it? All things considered, Russell's play wasn't that bad. He led the offense to putting 24 points on the board, which if you look at averages, should win a majority of games played. His play was not the root cause but rather one of several factors in our loss. Does that sound to you like I'm piling on?
I am trying to objectively discuss our QB's weaknesses and areas in which he can improve his game. You keep getting emotional, defending him with irrational statements like "If you expect other QBs to play better on the road against the Denver defense, then go and try to get them on the team.
Try defending him with logic, such as mykc has done, rather than these emotional outbursts that seem to have consumed you when trying to discuss the subject.
I already defended him with logic. You don't go by logic. You get something in your head then grind it over and over and over again without a factual basis. I don't think I owe you a single beer, coffee, or beverage and you owe me a few due to the way you grind something without facts. Russell doesn't need to play better because if he does, he's setting the NFL record for TDs and yards in a season. That is an impossible expectation by you and the peanut gallery.
Fact is you're expectations have reached a stupid level. I want you to use that ability to logic you claim you have, think about where he was playing and with whom, and then logically accept that he deserves next to none of the blame other than what is standard for any QB not playing perfect.
On top of that, I want you realize that in the NFL blaming is a waste of time. These players will work harder than any beer-drinking, sideline sitting fan to analyze the real problems with what happened with inside knowledge of the play and schemes and work to fix them.