c_hawkbob wrote:can we PLEASE get an O-line now?
c_hawkbob wrote:can we PLEASE get an O-line now?
c_hawkbob wrote:can we PLEASE get an O-line now?
Are you kidding? We already have a VASTLY improved offensive line. We need to trade up and get us a quarterback.
obiken wrote:http://www.espn.com/blog/seattle-seahawks/post/_/id/24030/seahawks-fall-short-of-super-bowl-goal-during-average-season
Great read. We cant just retool the OL we only have 5.1 million unless you get rid of Graham.
obiken wrote:http://www.espn.com/blog/seattle-seahawks/post/_/id/24030/seahawks-fall-short-of-super-bowl-goal-during-average-season
Great read. We cant just retool the OL we only have 5.1 million unless you get rid of Graham.
Hawktawk wrote:Bye hauchka. Fire Bevell twice and use graham, don't trade him. Cut kearse so there is no way Russell can target him anymore.
mykc14 wrote:No need to completely revamp anything. We NEED to improve along the oline. We have an extremely talented roster that has the financial flexibility to improve. The window isn't closing and we don't need to clean house. Improve Oline, get healthy, stay healthy seems like a recipe for a good run to me...
HumanCockroach wrote:
Yep, but only if there's an available upgrade, with tread left, and isn't going to eat all of the available cap space. Unfortunately for Seattle, there isn't going to BE any tackle upgrades wandering the streets, regardless of how much we need or want them, seems to be a major sticking point or a point of confusion for many, year after year after year.
Best we can hope for is a team up against the cap being dumb enough to release one ( fat chance) or trading up for a high draft pick ( unlikely to part with the bulk of our draft for a single rookie line prospect) or keep drafting them repeatedly, how our injured players come back fully healthy, and pray that one of them blows up the odds and excels far greater than expected, and learn a little patience allowing them to fully develop.
There really is no realistic alternatives, barring pipe dreams like trading for Thomas or something which is highly unlikely and doubtful at best.
HumanCockroach wrote:Not sure how trading a top five corner in the league, in his prime, helps this team in any way shape or form.
The POPE wrote:Sherman has been exposed a little without ET there to cover his ass. He can't play as free and take as many chances without ET. The LOB was great when all the members were there. Not anymore, getting older, slower, and more injury prone. Put Sherman on another team, in a different scheme, with no ET and at best you have an above average corner, but not a top 5 corner. With ET coming back no changes will be made with the major players.The LOB is not to be feared anymore. Teams don't fear Sherman, Kam, or any of the role players anymore. Maybe they can get the swagger back, but some changes will need to be made. It will be interesting to see what those are, if any
HumanCockroach wrote:Give it a rest RD, You aren't baiting me, I could care less, and honestly rubbing salt in open wounds of someone that bleeds blue and green and has for thirty years is pretty low class, and more something I expect of Niners or Boys fans, not 12's.
I don't remember seeing jabs after the 90 yard opening drive, or the Detroit game, young players need to find consistency, that's life. I can cope, even if you can't, or aren't willing to.
HumanCockroach wrote:That's crap. I made a post in what? Week 6? That was indeed accurate regardless of your feelings on it, don't give a golden polished turd what your beef is, the statement at the time was 100 percent accurate, and you've spent the ENTIRE f#cking season going back to it. I've expressed my opinion on it a thousand times, a thousand different ways, interestingly enough, when they played well ( which happened far more often than you have ever been willing to admit) or showed promise, did I personally try to bait you? Did I continually call you out? No? Imagine that. Baiting is directly pointed at someone, not a general statement. You've admitted it, acknowledged it, even gone so far as to apologise for it, and have claimed you were going to end it. Yet every couple weeks, there it is again ( not that I should have ever believed you could do what you said, so I reckon that's my fault somehow).
WTF ever RD. I don't give a F#ck what your opinion of it is, you're pissy ( just like you are after every single loss, and unsatisfied after every win "but it was only insert whatever team you want"). I tend to let go quickly and look forward. You want to revel in the misery, that's your deal, enjoy it, I couldn't care less, leave me out of it. b****, moan and whine to your heart's delight.
Posting an article showing improvement isn't baiting anyone, nor is agreeing with it, nor is noting the improvements made, you seem to have a severe case of an overdeveloped sense of worth believing everything posted needs your judgement and approval, if it doesn't meet your standards, too damn bad.
Peace out.
HumanCockroach wrote:I'm one hundred percent sure, I replied to another poster ( even has his post attached). Not sure where you got the idea that making a joke with another poster ( you know what that was, hence the lol face at the end) is somehow an attempt to bait you, but it isn't. Am I now to be worried how you're going to take a post made Directly to another poster now? Fear RD's judgement? You've got to be kidding. No one can believe every post, to every member, is somehow a direct attack or reply to them, can they? What kind of ego does that take?
It was a fricken joke about missed receivers, unfortunately, I didn't realize judge RD would take offense, I postulate before the almighty RD, should have known better.
Barf.
Hawktawk wrote:Our front 7 was as pathetic as any unit on the field . Their inability to stop the run or consistently get pressure on Ryan is the biggest story of the game. I guess Bennett tried to gouge an offensive lineman in the eye and threatened a reporter who asked about the anemic pass rush.
Et will help but this defense is going sideways and cannot stop good teams anymore or even bad teams with a good offense as Az showed. The last 3 decent to excellent offenses rolled it up on us. It ain't all the offensive line
HumanCockroach wrote:Awesome to know that you also get to decide not only what was meant, but to whom it was addressing RD. What a f#cking joke. Read it again, was it a dig? Or was it simply an attempt to express frustration over Wilson's inability to hit wide open receivers running In for a TD this season while attempting to avoid the Wilson can do no wrong crowd? ( You know you, Anthony etc).... Hmmm?
Get over yourself, life nor this board revolves around your opinion, belief or judgement.
HumanCockroach wrote:Nah, I'm done. I'm honestly, not in the least, interested in this crap anymore. I'm tired, you win RD. I'm out. At least for a while. I'm sure you and Obi and Anthony can enjoy a nice long discussion about the failings of the line, FO and the defense that needs dismantling without me involved. Enjoy, I haven't the energy, or desire to be continually accused of doing or saying things I haven't.
Hawktawk wrote:BOYS BOYS!!!!lets don't cannibalize one another.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests