HumanCockroach wrote:I like the situation they are currently in. Always was a strong believer in continuity in offense in regards to the backup QB. One reason I wanted Jackson gone and Daniels inserted as the primary backup.
RiverDog wrote:It's a no never mind. If we lose Russell, we're screwed no matter who our back-up is, so there's no sense in devoting a lot of resources into a backup QB. Boykin is cheap.
jshawaii22 wrote:What we know about Jake is if he's playing we're toast. Drink that magic water Russell. Get well, soon...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests