monkey wrote:I think it was all a matter of having their cake and eating it with the Broncos trade. They got to move down and add a third, AND they didn't move out of the first round, and were still able to get THE guy they wanted most.
With the Dallas trade, they would have been risking missing Ifedi, and I don't think they wanted to take that chance.
jshawaii22 wrote:http://espn.go.com/nfl/draft2016/story/_/id/15425129/dallas-cowboys-wanted-trade-take-paxton-lynch-memphis-first-round-nfl-draft
interesting, if true... we turned down the Cowboys offer of their second AND third round pick and would of gone more, but the Seahawks took Denver's offer instead. I would of had no issue with the Lynch to the Cowboys. Which offer would of been better? We wouldn't of ended up at the end of the first round, but would have waited only 4 more picks and would of ended with multiple 2's and a way better 3rd at least, and probably a little more.
js
NorthHawk wrote:
I would be surprised if he started the first game at RT, but he might be at RG to begin.
It's going to take a while to get up to speed on NFL level of play and get to the point where he doesn't have to think about what he has learned from OTA's onward.
monkey replied:
LG most likely I would bet. I doubt RG, because at RG they tend to like guys to be a little bit smaller and quicker. LG they have used Carpenter, and Britt. They want BIG road graders at LG, and that is definitely Ifedi.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:So, 2nd round pick. Perhaps and outside shot that either will be there, but, if you have the choice, would you go with:
Chris Jones, DT, MS State
Connor McGovern, C/G, Mizzou
I'm a Bulldog alum, so I'd love Jones as a Seahawk, but Connor looks like a dude the o line could really use. I'm going with Connor. Could seriously solidify the line with him and Ifedi.
monkey wrote:Good point.
At the moment, if we don't draft another lineman, we'd look like this:
LT: Gilliam
LG: *Webb/Ifedi/Britt
Center: Lewis
RG: Glowinski
RT: *Ifedi/Webb/Britt
* listed in order of who I think is most likely to start where as of right now.
Best part is, we're not done yet. Tomorrow we'll add at LEAST one more, possibly up to three more O-linemen, and one of them is bound to be a center to upgrade that spot.
After tomorrow, I expect the line to be, LT: Gilliam LG: Webb C: McGovern/or another rookie RG: Glowinski RT: Ifedi
I see this line actually improving over last years mess when all is said and done, in spite of the doom and gloom prognostications.
obiken wrote:
OK I am going into my draft whine mode. I hate to. But when is he going to be ready to play? Weak 9? Its like they always get a guy that never has any skill and has long arms and then try to coach him. Football focus had him as a 6th round pick. He is another project. He is another lump of clay, that if he works out Cable takes all the credit, IF not Cable has a built in excuse. NFL Scouts, ESPN, FBF, all have him as a looks the part but no skill. The NFL analysis is below. In short Monk, he is another project gosh damn it sob ect ect, we don't have time for projects. This guy IMHO, is 3 years away. Who know many with 6-6 325 we could move him to DT. I am fine with all of this till our future ends up with a torn ACL, then flip out will have an all new meaning. T A&M the home of lineman Bust.
Weaknesses Offensive scheme limited ability to fire out. Tries to snatch with hands and hang on rather than securing blocks with leg drive. Inconsistent depth of pass sets opens up edge. Timing of combo blocks needs work. Gets in a hurry and doesn't always get first block secured. Uses more of a kick stomp than fluid kick slide. High pad level on down blocks limits leg drive to secure. Passive vertical pass sets allow easy pocket squeeze. Needs to eliminate habit of leaning into blocks. Too content to stalemate rather than dominate. Patience and discipline is a problem in pass protection. Lunges rather than letting the rep come to him.
Draft Projection Round 2
Sources Tell Us "I think he should have gone back (to school). I like the talent, but he didn't put it together like I needed to see to give him a first two-round grade. I see him as a guard and not a tackle." -- NFC area scout
NFL Comparison Billy Turner
RiverDog wrote:I wouldn't be surprised to see us use that 3rd round pick acquired from Denver to trade up in the 2nd. We're a team that unlike the Browns, we don't need numbers, so I can't see hanging onto 3 draft picks grouped so closely together.
OK I am going into my draft whine mode. I hate to. But when is he going to be ready to play? Weak 9? Its like they always get a guy that never has any skill and has long arms and then try to coach him. Football focus had him as a 6th round pick. He is another project. He is another lump of clay, that if he works out Cable takes all the credit, IF not Cable has a built in excuse. NFL Scouts, ESPN, FBF, all have him as a looks the part but no skill. The NFL analysis is below. In short Monk, he is another project gosh damn it sob ect ect, we don't have time for projects. This guy IMHO, is 3 years away. Who know many with 6-6 325 we could move him to DT. I am fine with all of this till our future ends up with a torn ACL, then flip out will have an all new meaning. T A&M the home of lineman Bust.
Weaknesses Offensive scheme limited ability to fire out. Tries to snatch with hands and hang on rather than securing blocks with leg drive. Inconsistent depth of pass sets opens up edge. Timing of combo blocks needs work. Gets in a hurry and doesn't always get first block secured. Uses more of a kick stomp than fluid kick slide. High pad level on down blocks limits leg drive to secure. Passive vertical pass sets allow easy pocket squeeze. Needs to eliminate habit of leaning into blocks. Too content to stalemate rather than dominate. Patience and discipline is a problem in pass protection. Lunges rather than letting the rep come to him.
Draft Projection Round 2
Sources Tell Us "I think he should have gone back (to school). I like the talent, but he didn't put it together like I needed to see to give him a first two-round grade. I see him as a guard and not a tackle." -- NFC area scout
NFL Comparison Billy Turner
obiken
Legacy
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sat Dec 14, 2013 4:50 pm
Location: Wilsonville, Oregon 97070
Ultimately, it's a crap shoot whether it be Tunsil or Ifedi or any other player. That's what the draft is.
obiken wrote:OK I am going into my draft whine mode. I hate to. But when is he going to be ready to play? Weak 9?
Sources Tell Us "I think he should have gone back (to school). I like the talent, but he didn't put it together like I needed to see to give him a first two-round grade. I see him as a guard and not a tackle." -- NFC area scout
NFL Comparison Billy Turner
monkey wrote:YES!
That's both of the players I was worried about, hoping that Seattle wouldn't take them, GONE BABY!
No Nkemdiche, and no Derrick Henry.
obiken wrote:Analysis
Weaknesses Ineffective pass rusher.
And that's why I didn't think we'd take him, but he really does perfectly replace Mebane.
obiken wrote:Sure, but we have pass rushers up the ying yang, we were missing the run stopper like Red Bryant or Mebane.
Obiken, I am going to ask you to do something here that may go against the grain, because you are the kind of guy who doesn't just swallow every line fed to you, you want to see it first.
In fact I'm going to ask you to do two things that just don't come naturally to you bud.
First, I'm going to ask you to trust that, as a guy who lives in the Fargo North Dakota area, and has actually seen Billy Turner play, every single home game of his entire collegiate career, that I REALLY KNOW what I am talking about when I say that, if that scout's comparison to Ifedi is Billy Turner, then that scout knows ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT BILLY TURNER OR GERMAIN IFEDI!!! Not one single bloody thing!
Those two are so different, so incredibly different. They have almost no similarities AT ALL. They are two VASTLY different players.
Ifedi is a FAR, FAR more athletic player than Turner. They play so differently, and have such radically different styles that hte thought to compare them to each other would never even cross my mind.
Now the second thing I'm going to ask you to do is, completely ignore that idiot scout, and instead listen to the guys like Rob Stanton, (and several others as well), who are saying that Ifedi is going to play day one, and will upgrade the line
obiken wrote:Actually I would have happier to take our 2nd round pick 1st and our 1st 2nd, but ok. I'm there.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests