Feez wrote:
this would be a short term solution from the Texans viewpoint and from ours why would we trade Michael when there is a very real possibility Lynch is going to retire after this season? Even if we drafted a replacement in the next draft they most likely won't be ready to take that many snaps straight out of their rookie camp. Rice would be a nightmare PR wise which probably takes him out of consideration for a stop gap pick up but both Jackson and Johnson have enough left in the tank to fill in for a few weeks
I don't think you've seen Steven Jackson or Chris Johnson run lately if you think they have enough left in the tank. Jonson is a straight line runner who was only effective when he had world class speed. Now he can't get to the corner or beat LBs to the hole and he has no wiggle. Steven Jackson is an absolute shell of what he used to be. The Cowboys chose Darren McFadden over either of them (even though Steven Jackson was lobbying to go to Dallas), that should tell you something.
Foster is having surgery tomorrow and will almost certainly get IRed with designation to return, which means he'll be out for at least half the season, not a couple of games. Also Groin injuries are also notoriously easy to reaggravate and Foster is almost 30 and has been banged up for the last three seasons with a giant contract. If they aren't looking for a long term replacement, they should be.
It makes all the sense in the world for the Texans to get a young fresh RB who would have had a first round grade if not for off the field concerns and has no tread wear (who also happens to be from Texas) if all it costs them is a conditional 5th round pick.
Again not advocating for the trade but it makes complete sense if your the Texans