HumanCockroach wrote:I certainly could see a benefit for a player on something structured to make "all" of his money. It isn't the salary players are pining for, it's the guarantee's.... Something like 7 years, starting at 10-12 and working up to 18-20 over the length of it, certainly would allow the team to keep building the team, while protecting the player as well ( something like 10/12/14/17/17/18/22 = 110 million guaranteed. The team loses if the players career ends, or he goes in the tank, other than that, it allows the team the flexability to continue to assure good players around him for 7 years, while allowing him the ability to make a ton of money).
briwas101 wrote:I don't think the CBA allows the hawks to say, "take less money and we will make sure you make tons of money in endorsements" BUT if the hawks do aggressively help Russell become one of (if not THE) most endorsed player in the league first then I don't think they would violate any rules by trying to get him to sign a below-market deal.
THAT is how I have interpreted the "outside the box" comments, although guaranteeing a huge % would also work.
It shouldn't matter to Russell where his money is coming from, so if all he has to do is make a few more commercials to make up for a below - market contract and it allows him to throw to an actual #1 WR I think he would be open to it.
[url][/url]Old but Slow wrote:Yes, it is interesting, and there is a bit of test of sensibility here. Some players seem to value the status of having the biggest number in front of their name, and others who just want the value. It is fine to have the big number contract, but what are the guarantees? How many $40 Million contracts have paid the guy $8 million? A smaller gross number with more guaranteed is the better contract for the player.
Russell is astute. And he is not apparently ego driven. So I would not be surprised if he signs for something in the $18 million per year range, with a large portion guaranteed. There is a lot more security with the big number guaranteed, then there is with the big number up front.
Old but Slow wrote:Yes, it is interesting, and there is a bit of test of sensibility here. Some players seem to value the status of having the biggest number in front of their name, and others who just want the value. It is fine to have the big number contract, but what are the guarantees? How many $40 Million contracts have paid the guy $8 million? A smaller gross number with more guaranteed is the better contract for the player.
Russell is astute. And he is not apparently ego driven. So I would not be surprised if he signs for something in the $18 million per year range, with a large portion guaranteed. There is a lot more security with the big number guaranteed, then there is with the big number up front.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests