Hawk Sista wrote:Ricardo Lockette in this moment makes zero sense. His alligator arms didn't help, the play call was horrendous.
#hawksforever
RiverDog wrote:I have been watching football for over 50 years, and given the game situation and significance of the game, that ranks as the worst play call that I have ever seen in my life. It wouldn't have been so bad had it not been 2nd down, had we not had a timeout left, had it not been that it would have been to our advantage to run the clock down to 15 seconds or so, or had the pass play been a safe corner throw, or if we were having little success on the ground. With 3 cracks at getting one yard, there's about a 99% chance that Lynch would have gotten that one yard. It made me sick to my stomach. I never like losing, but losing like that is a very tough pill to swallow. We snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory.
And although Bevel is the obvious villain and deserves every bit of venom that we can hurl towards him, we should not let two immortal Gods off the hook, either. Russell should have never thrown that ball and Pete Carroll's liberal riverboat gambler-fly in the face of conventional wisdom style that enabled Bevell to make such a call rose up and bit him in the ass at the worst possible moment.
I am absolutely sick. The wife is locking all the upstairs windows and hiding all the guns and knives as we speak.
Anthony wrote:[What exactly was Wilson suppose to do, it is a timing play and he pretty much has no choice. Dumb play call.
savvyman wrote:Yes the Worst play call in the History of the NFL.
savvyman wrote:As I speculated on the obvious above - Seahawk players are the angriest of all.
http://www.sbnation.com/2015/2/1/7961557/pete-carroll-interview-postgame-super-bowl-2015
RiverDog wrote:
Like I said, it was the worst play call I've ever seen. But it doesn't excuse the play execution. Russell didn't have to throw the ball at all. He did not see the defender lurking to jump that route. Had he anticipated the DB jumping that route, he could have reloaded, scrambled, fired the ball out of bounds, even taken a sack. Plus I assume that he always had the option to audible out of the call from the bench. Bad decision. You can't excuse him. He turned the ball over under zero pressure at the worst possible moment. Had that been Tony Romo or Colin Kaepernick, we would have all been giving the choke sign.
RiverDog wrote:
Like I said, it was the worst play call I've ever seen. But it doesn't excuse the play execution. Russell didn't have to throw the ball at all. He did not see the defender lurking to jump that route. Had he anticipated the DB jumping that route, he could have reloaded, scrambled, fired the ball out of bounds, even taken a sack. Plus I assume that he always had the option to audible out of the call from the bench. Bad decision. You can't excuse him. He turned the ball over under zero pressure at the worst possible moment. Had that been Tony Romo or Colin Kaepernick, we would have all been giving the choke sign.
Anthony wrote:Oh so Wilson is to blame because in your mind he should have known that locket would not have beaten his guy to the spot, in less than 1 second. FYI PC just said there was no audible on that play sorry this one is not on Wilson at all.
RiverDog wrote:
Partially to blame. The majority of blame falls on the play call, and as I have said repeatedly, it is the worst call I have ever witnessed.
But I'm not going to apologize for Russell as you seem inclined to do. His receiver didn't fall down, the ball didn't bounce off the receiver's hands, the receiver did not run the wrong route, and the OL did not fail to protect him. Russell knew the game situation, that he still had two plays left FROM THE ONE and a timeout in his pocket. If the receiver was not clearly open, he should not have thrown it. The entire game was in his hands, and he blew it.
NorthHawk wrote:It seems to me the Pats were stacking the box in expectation of a run. It also means that the pass shouldn't be thrown into the middle where all the Defensive players are but rather if thrown, to a TE or WR in the corner or in the back of the end zone.
Just a mind boggling play call from my perspective.
HumanCockroach wrote:Talked to my brother, and multiple freinds about the play after the game had ended, and I think the single BIGGEST issue anyone had, is we lost NOT doing what WE do ( isn't this a mantra amongst Seahawks players?) IF they had handed the ball to Lynch three times and he doesn't get in? Tip the cap, and loss is acceptable, fumble it on the one running Lynch? Tip the cap, and it is acceptable. Why? Because that IS what Seattle does, and stopping the run is NOT what NE does.
Not only that, but the playcall, removed Wilson's STRENGTH as well..... IF Seattle was hell bent on throwing the ball, they could ( and should) have brought in their heavy set, run a play action roll out to a TE and allowed Wilson to CHOOSE to throw it, or run it, under NO circumstances should Bevell or anyone thought a throw into the teeth of the defense, with the 4th receiver was a good idea in that circumstance, where Wilson isn't "reading" squat, he is planting and throwing the ball on a timing route, in a condensed area, with the Patriots playing at the line of scrimmage.
True Wilson could have not thrown the ball, but the person he was throwing to, WAS the primary receiver on the play, the kid from NE made a hell of a play, but he should NEVER have had that chance in the first place....
IMHO this has little to do with the right decision, and EVERYTHING to do with Bevells ego, and obvious desire to weed the running game from his attack, and his childish issues with Lynch ( go back and look folks, ever since the little one fingered salute from Lynch in Wilsons first game, his short yardage goal line attempts have dwindled and dwindled and dwindled. Lynch scores plenty in the red zone, but 90% of the time it comes from outside the 5). I'm done with the guy. He stole this victory from this team,Lynch and more importantly from us 12's. NO one is "bigger" than the team, NO one, and Bevell's ego, crept up at the WORST possible moment, in the WORST possible game, on the BIGGEST possible stage.
As far as I'm concerned he can just stay in Arizona and work on his golf game.
NorthHawk wrote:It seems to me the Pats were stacking the box in expectation of a run. It also means that the pass shouldn't be thrown into the middle where all the Defensive players are but rather if thrown, to a TE or WR in the corner or in the back of the end zone.
Just a mind boggling play call from my perspective.
I have been watching football for over 50 years, and given the game situation and significance of the game, that ranks as the worst play call that I have ever seen in my life.
If the vaunted d wants to get critical, maybe they shouldn't have given up 14 points in the 4th.
Hawk Sista wrote:Wilson, Pete and Bevel all took responsibility. Their interviews were so much more classy than whiney ass Rogers two weeks ago. Of course players were heart-broken and took some shots. Hell, I did from my couch. It HURTS!!!
It's too bad Melissa Stark and all the others who can't wait to tweet ish out doesn't tweet out all the interviews I just heard where team member after broken hearted team player said the right thing. You know, there is nobody who doesn't owe the fact that we made it as far as we did to the guy who owns the decision. NOBODY!!!
If the vaunted d wants to get critical, maybe they shouldn't have given up 14 points in the 4th. Really...it was a game for the ages and RW had a good game, Marshawn had a great game, Mathews had a great game, bennet had a great game, Bev called a decent game. We had more yards, we came up short. It's tough to lose this way (feels worse than a blowout) but wanting someone's head right now is really stupid & immature. Lockette reaches better and we win and Bev is a genius. It's easy to sit on your couch and be critical. We have been the NFC champs thrice in 10 years. That's better than a kick in the teeth.
Thanks coaches, players, john and Paul. It was a great year.
HumanCockroach wrote:Talked to my brother, and multiple freinds about the play after the game had ended, and I think the single BIGGEST issue anyone had, is we lost NOT doing what WE do ( isn't this a mantra amongst Seahawks players?) IF they had handed the ball to Lynch three times and he doesn't get in? Tip the cap, and loss is acceptable, fumble it on the one running Lynch? Tip the cap, and it is acceptable. Why? Because that IS what Seattle does, and stopping the run is NOT what NE does.
Not only that, but the playcall, removed Wilson's STRENGTH as well..... IF Seattle was hell bent on throwing the ball, they could ( and should) have brought in their heavy set, run a play action roll out to a TE and allowed Wilson to CHOOSE to throw it, or run it, under NO circumstances should Bevell or anyone thought a throw into the teeth of the defense, with the 4th receiver was a good idea in that circumstance, where Wilson isn't "reading" squat, he is planting and throwing the ball on a timing route, in a condensed area, with the Patriots playing at the line of scrimmage.
True Wilson could have not thrown the ball, but the person he was throwing to, WAS the primary receiver on the play, the kid from NE made a hell of a play, but he should NEVER have had that chance in the first place....
IMHO this has little to do with the right decision, and EVERYTHING to do with Bevells ego, and obvious desire to weed the running game from his attack, and his childish issues with Lynch ( go back and look folks, ever since the little one fingered salute from Lynch in Wilsons first game, his short yardage goal line attempts have dwindled and dwindled and dwindled. Lynch scores plenty in the red zone, but 90% of the time it comes from outside the 5). I'm done with the guy. He stole this victory from this team,Lynch and more importantly from us 12's. NO one is "bigger" than the team, NO one, and Bevell's ego, crept up at the WORST possible moment, in the WORST possible game, on the BIGGEST possible stage.
As far as I'm concerned he can just stay in Arizona and work on his golf game.
RiverDog wrote: If the receiver was not clearly open, he should not have thrown it. The entire game was in his hands, and he blew it.
monkey wrote:Riverdog, you're actually starting to really piss me off now. This is pure grade A horseshit and you KNOW IT IS!
That's not how a freaking timing play like that works, and you KNOW IT! You've watched enough football that I shouldn't have to lecture you on slant, timing patterns 101.
Lockette WAS open when Wilson threw the damn ball, he WAS! That defender simply fought through and made a play. That's NOT Wilson's fault and your insistence that it was, is really rubbing me the wrong way, because it's showing me that you clearly have some axe to grind here.
You are ALWAYS the first to try to blame Wilson for anything that goes wrong ALWAYS. You're always trying to somehow pin responsibility for bad things on him, even when it is plainly obvious it was not his fault.
This was a TIMING route...you understand that right? He get's the ball, sees that his receiver has the correct separation (and he DID!!) then throws to the spot where his receiver will be, which he did.
IT'S A STUPID PLAY CALL!!! In that spot, throwing into the middle of traffic, when you can simply run the damn ball, is simply THE MOST BRAIN DEAD, BONEHEADED PLAY CALL IMAGINABLE!
Stop, stop, stop with this ridiculous axe you have to grind against Wilson. It's nauseating and you've been doing it all damn year now.
There's nothing to be done. All the ranting and raving is just hurting you.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 47 guests