Hawktawk wrote:RD I saw a test that was conducted with everyday people who dont even play football and THEY could tell the difference.Brady is LYING. Billacheat is LYING.
Oh and BTW why did Seattle get jumped on for using an MLK quote in a promo and Brady can tell the world "this isn't ISIS". Where is the moral outrage? That is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard any athlete say when trying to cover his ass.Talk about a callous disregard for the people who have had relatives publicly beheaded and shot like dogs in the street.
The more I think about it the more I have to ask. HOW LONG has it been going on? It is widely suspected that Spy gate went on from the beginning of Billacheats tenure. Why is this any different? The Colts complained after the first meeting.At a minimum something changed dramatically for Brady and the Pats after they were drubbed by KC and Brady was benched in the second half after multiple turnovers.
One could make the case they would have beat the colts with 20 lbs of air in the ball but the Ravens were certainly an opponent they may well have beaten only due to their competitive advantage.The Pats came back from 14 down twice in the divisional round. Flacco uncharacteristically threw a couple of killer picks in the inclement conditions while Gronk was making circus catches and Blount was error free from a turnover standpoint.The ball is easier to catch and hang on to deflated slightly, not just throw. Its a microcosm of the Nerf ball philosophy.
Goodell will lose any shred of credibility he has which isn't much if they whitewash this scandal.Some of the punishment should be handed down right now IMO.
NorthHawk wrote:Brady said he checked the balls and accepts them as just like he wants them before they are put in the bag before the game.
That he wouldn't know they are different when the game starts is inconceivable.
My guess is he had a tacit agreement with the ball boy or equipment manager to slightly deflate the balls.
I've heard some different theories about how it could have happened - one of them is they were inflated and tested in a very hot room and when they went outside the pressure naturally decreases. It might be true, and maybe work, but who would agree to heat the room up that much in order to do that? It seems to me that it would have to be a team management decision to knowingly bend the rules to their advantage. That sounds like something the Pats would do considering their past and what they did in their playoff match with the Colts with their eligible/ineligible player changes.
Proving deceit in this case will be a difficult task unless someone confesses.
c_hawkbob wrote:2 to 3%. That's how much the air temperature difference would make. It's a BS explanation.
He said the balls were"artificially inflated to 12.5 lbs
savvyman wrote:Not a Former Player or coach.
But Bill Nye "The Science Guy" says that Belichick's explanation is BS.
http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/bill-nye-the-science-guy-says-bill-belichick-is-full-of-1681658679?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&utm_source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
Hawktawk wrote:This is the problem I have with this. Its obvious they are lying. If it were a criminal matter no lawyer would ever advise Brady or Belichick to open their yaps, because they are impeaching themselves worse with every syllable.
I think they realize they are going to get hammered by the league in a very dramatic fashion and they would like to muddle the issue for another week.
The pr offensive is all about making sure it doesn't happen before Sunday. Because the ride might be coming to an end in NE for one or the other of them if not both.
Again, where is Goodell?He has said he would use a lower burden of proof for repeat offenders and frankly there is proof something was done that manipulated the air pressure in the footballs.
I guess the appointment of Ted Wells suggests a whitewash at least in terms of knocking the story off the front pages for the immediate future. It will a topic for this Superbowl regardless.
I love that Richard Sherman is telling the truth, but, couldn't he have waited until February 2nd. ??
Hawktawk wrote:Maybe there is a smoking gun.Fox Sports is reporting that the investigation is focused on a Patriots locker room attendant who is seen on videotape taking the inspected footballs from the locker room to another room before exiting and taking them to the field. He has already been interviewed.
Hawktawk wrote:Maybe there is a smoking gun.Fox Sports is reporting that the investigation is focused on a Patriots locker room attendant who is seen on videotape taking the inspected footballs from the locker room to another room before exiting and taking them to the field. He has already been interviewed.
savvyman wrote:Again the key point from that person who did the statistical analysis is that the under-inflated football is easier to grip - not only by the QB - But even more importantly by the running back and receivers who through that guys statistics showed that the patriots fumbles drop to a near statistically impossible low rate beginning in 2007 - right when the NFL allowed teams to "Bring Your Own Football" to games.
savvyman wrote:Rep for Wilson - Manufacturer of NFL Footballs - Says Belichick's explantion is "BS"
http://deadspin.com/nfl-football-manufacturer-also-says-bill-belichick-is-f-1681802079
The real answer is that you should have paid more attention in school, maybe gone into a STEM field, and maybe you wouldn't be blogging 17 blogs about soft footballs as if this, any of this, could possibly matter in any way, ever, to anyone.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests