HawkWow wrote:Vikes ask permission to interview Dan Quinn for HC job. 2 things:
1) Screw the Vikes
2) There should be a rule disallowing ANY such requests, or even mention of prospective candidates, that are still actively coaching another team. Because the Vikes sucked and their season over, why should our team, or any other play-off team, be penalized with such distraction?
I don't like it and it shouldn't be this way, IMO. I say, with apologies to Dan Quinn, we deny this and any other such request until OUR season has concluded.
Zorn76 wrote:Get used to it.
We're a top contending team for the SB, so naturally the coaching staff is gonna be seriously considered for vacant HC gigs elsewhere.
Even if Quinn leaves, we'll be fine.
RiverDog wrote:HawkWow wrote:Vikes ask permission to interview Dan Quinn for HC job. 2 things:
1) Screw the Vikes
2) There should be a rule disallowing ANY such requests, or even mention of prospective candidates, that are still actively coaching another team. Because the Vikes sucked and their season over, why should our team, or any other play-off team, be penalized with such distraction?
I don't like it and it shouldn't be this way, IMO. I say, with apologies to Dan Quinn, we deny this and any other such request until OUR season has concluded.
It's better than the colleges, where coaches routinely accept other jobs before their last games in their current job.
FolkCrusader wrote:Even if there was a rule against it teams would still be contacting coaches via less official means. The fact is the process happens quickly and if you want to be considered you need to be available. Pete's willingness to let guys interview guarantees that he gets a good shot at the best possible replacements. He handles it the right way.
HawkWow wrote:While on that subject, even though not comparably optimum for viewing / advertising compared to the holiday season, I don't see how the current format of forcing (some) teams to wait an entire month to play is good for anyone other than the networks. These kids have lives they need to get on with, whether football related or not. Just my opinion. Love college football...the NCAA, not so much.
Oly wrote:HawkWow wrote:While on that subject, even though not comparably optimum for viewing / advertising compared to the holiday season, I don't see how the current format of forcing (some) teams to wait an entire month to play is good for anyone other than the networks. These kids have lives they need to get on with, whether football related or not. Just my opinion. Love college football...the NCAA, not so much.
I'll play devil's advocate here. I'm a college professor (not at a D1 school, but I was for my 5 years of grad work), and many of these kids spend so much time on football during the semester that they really need some time off to catch up before final exams. Despite popular belief, there are some--admittedly too few--athletes who really are students and want to get something out of college other than a ticket to the NFL. Having time off gives them time to prepare for finals.
Now, this doesn't make the Jan 5th and 6th games make any sense. I'd just as soon have students finish by Jan 1 so that they can get a little time off before starting the next semester, but I don't mind having students wait until the winter break to play their bowl games.
HawkWow wrote:Zorn76 wrote:Get used to it.
We're a top contending team for the SB, so naturally the coaching staff is gonna be seriously considered for vacant HC gigs elsewhere.
Even if Quinn leaves, we'll be fine.
I think that all goes without saying, Zorn. My point being that such activity should be delayed until after a candidate's team is eliminated from play.
Clem7 wrote:"Quite frankly, I have been hoping Wilson would just start ignoring the plays Bevell sends in and just call his own plays." (Seahawk4Ever)
LOL and agree.
HawkWow wrote:Vikes ask permission to interview Dan Quinn for HC job. 2 things:
1) Screw the Vikes
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests