c_hawkbob wrote:He got flat tire'd (back of his heel stepped on), no biggie.
Distant Relative wrote:c_hawkbob wrote:He got flat tire'd (back of his heel stepped on), no biggie.
Most guys would have walked it off. Not a matter of if but when with PH IMO.
HumanCockroach wrote:Come on D.R. give it a chance man, just give it a chance.... He might be hurt, hell, I don't know, just know when he isn't hurt, he changes the entire complexion of that offense.
HumanCockroach wrote:All that shows is either you have never watched the man play football, or your bias is so incredibly deep that you are incapable of rational thought. The SB WAS Harvin, in a SMALL, VERY small dose, multiply it by 5 and you might be close. The man changes the dynamic of that offense because EVERY time he touches the ball, no matter WHERE on the field he can score, something Tate ( as much as I defended, and appreciated the guy) and Baldwin simply do NOT have the ability to do.
Anyone claiming "mediocre" doesn't really garner any type of consideration about what they are saying, you want to claim the "health" thing, fine, but actual talent? Makes you look silly, biased or slow, nothing more..
briwas101 wrote:HumanCockroach wrote:Come on D.R. give it a chance man, just give it a chance.... He might be hurt, hell, I don't know, just know when he isn't hurt, he changes the entire complexion of that offense.
He does? He was mediocre in every game but the superbowl.
When he's "healthy" he still isn't as good as Baldwin or Tate who's no longer here.
HumanCockroach wrote:Agree with RD, his ability isn't in question, his health is another matter. While I don't adhere to the players health is the all encompassing importance of a player, his and others health are key components to competing for another title.
c_hawkbob wrote:I don't know that there is any reason to call Percy's motivation into question.
HumanCockroach wrote:All that shows is either you have never watched the man play football, or your bias is so incredibly deep that you are incapable of rational thought. The SB WAS Harvin, in a SMALL, VERY small dose, multiply it by 5 and you might be close. The man changes the dynamic of that offense because EVERY time he touches the ball, no matter WHERE on the field he can score, something Tate ( as much as I defended, and appreciated the guy) and Baldwin simply do NOT have the ability to do.
Anyone claiming "mediocre" doesn't really garner any type of consideration about what they are saying, you want to claim the "health" thing, fine, but actual talent? Makes you look silly, biased or slow, nothing more..
NorthHawk wrote:edit
"You know I keep hearing that, and yet, he never seemed to have anyone other than one coach say anything derogatory about him. Seems off to me."
I hadn't heard that much, either except from disgruntled Viking fans.
/edit
Considering PC and JS put such a premium on competitiveness and the psychological aspect, I don't see how those things mesh - unless they think his abilities more than make up for any discontent he might display.
What I have heard is he plays so hard he puts himself in a position to get hurt.
The injuries might cause frustration which could be mistaken for being a malcontent - most of us really don't know him to say.
Futureite wrote:NorthHawk wrote:edit
"You know I keep hearing that, and yet, he never seemed to have anyone other than one coach say anything derogatory about him. Seems off to me."
I hadn't heard that much, either except from disgruntled Viking fans.
/edit
Considering PC and JS put such a premium on competitiveness and the psychological aspect, I don't see how those things mesh - unless they think his abilities more than make up for any discontent he might display.
What I have heard is he plays so hard he puts himself in a position to get hurt.
The injuries might cause frustration which could be mistaken for being a malcontent - most of us really don't know him to say.
Ok, not to cause an argument or suggest he will be a problem, but he does have a well documented history of conflicts with every football team that he has played for dating back to college. In fact, I listened to the Minnesota beat writer discuss this in depth on ESPNRadio when trade rumors were swirling around him back in Minnesota. His history is not in question.
Players with questionable character often practice or play extremely hard. TO is a prime example; probably the hardest worker on our entire team. That said I seriously doubt Harvin will bring any drama to the Hawks. If healrhy he is going to make plays all yr long.
FolkCrusader wrote:Futureite wrote:NorthHawk wrote:edit
"You know I keep hearing that, and yet, he never seemed to have anyone other than one coach say anything derogatory about him. Seems off to me."
I hadn't heard that much, either except from disgruntled Viking fans.
/edit
Considering PC and JS put such a premium on competitiveness and the psychological aspect, I don't see how those things mesh - unless they think his abilities more than make up for any discontent he might display.
What I have heard is he plays so hard he puts himself in a position to get hurt.
The injuries might cause frustration which could be mistaken for being a malcontent - most of us really don't know him to say.
Ok, not to cause an argument or suggest he will be a problem, but he does have a well documented history of conflicts with every football team that he has played for dating back to college. In fact, I listened to the Minnesota beat writer discuss this in depth on ESPNRadio when trade rumors were swirling around him back in Minnesota. His history is not in question.
Players with questionable character often practice or play extremely hard. TO is a prime example; probably the hardest worker on our entire team. That said I seriously doubt Harvin will bring any drama to the Hawks. If healrhy he is going to make plays all yr long.
Please produce this "well documented history" future. I think you will find it does not exist.
Futureite wrote:NorthHawk wrote:edit
"You know I keep hearing that, and yet, he never seemed to have anyone other than one coach say anything derogatory about him. Seems off to me."
I hadn't heard that much, either except from disgruntled Viking fans.
/edit
Considering PC and JS put such a premium on competitiveness and the psychological aspect, I don't see how those things mesh - unless they think his abilities more than make up for any discontent he might display.
What I have heard is he plays so hard he puts himself in a position to get hurt.
The injuries might cause frustration which could be mistaken for being a malcontent - most of us really don't know him to say.
Ok, not to cause an argument or suggest he will be a problem, but he does have a well documented history of conflicts with every football team that he has played for dating back to college. In fact, I listened to the Minnesota beat writer discuss this in depth on ESPNRadio when trade rumors were swirling around him back in Minnesota. His history is not in question.
Players with questionable character often practice or play extremely hard. TO is a prime example; probably the hardest worker on our entire team. That said I seriously doubt Harvin will bring any drama to the Hawks. If healrhy he is going to make plays all yr long.
FolkCrusader wrote:Futureite wrote:NorthHawk wrote:edit
"You know I keep hearing that, and yet, he never seemed to have anyone other than one coach say anything derogatory about him. Seems off to me."
I hadn't heard that much, either except from disgruntled Viking fans.
/edit
Considering PC and JS put such a premium on competitiveness and the psychological aspect, I don't see how those things mesh - unless they think his abilities more than make up for any discontent he might display.
What I have heard is he plays so hard he puts himself in a position to get hurt.
The injuries might cause frustration which could be mistaken for being a malcontent - most of us really don't know him to say.
Ok, not to cause an argument or suggest he will be a problem, but he does have a well documented history of conflicts with every football team that he has played for dating back to college. In fact, I listened to the Minnesota beat writer discuss this in depth on ESPNRadio when trade rumors were swirling around him back in Minnesota. His history is not in question.
Players with questionable character often practice or play extremely hard. TO is a prime example; probably the hardest worker on our entire team. That said I seriously doubt Harvin will bring any drama to the Hawks. If healrhy he is going to make plays all yr long.
Please produce this "well documented history" future. I think you will find it does not exist.
Futureite wrote:
Go to the Minnesota 2009 bleacher report which discusses Harvin having been kicked off his highschool football team for "numerous conflicts with players and faculty". Did that story exist or did it not. Why am I doing this when you should be the one who is reading and learning about your own player? I provided the seaech terms and the quote. He has an established history of conflict at each level.
Your next response is going to be to downplay that incident and tell me to find another article. I am through playing these little kid games here and arguing things that are common knowledge. Believe what you want to believe. I am not even bashing him as a "bad Hawk" or suggesting he will be a problem. I saw a post that I disagreed with, and I responded to it. End of story on my end.
Futureite wrote:
Go to the Minnesota 2009 bleacher report which discusses Harvin having been kicked off his highschool football team for "numerous conflicts with players and faculty". Did that story exist or did it not. Why am I doing this when you should be the one who is reading and learning about your own player? I provided the seaech terms and the quote. He has an established history of conflict at each level.
Your next response is going to be to downplay that incident and tell me to find another article. I am through playing these little kid games here and arguing things that are common knowledge. Believe what you want to believe. I am not even bashing him as a "bad Hawk" or suggesting he will be a problem. I saw a post that I disagreed with, and I responded to it. End of story on my end.
c_hawkbob wrote:Futureite wrote:
Go to the Minnesota 2009 bleacher report which discusses Harvin having been kicked off his highschool football team for "numerous conflicts with players and faculty". Did that story exist or did it not. Why am I doing this when you should be the one who is reading and learning about your own player? I provided the seaech terms and the quote. He has an established history of conflict at each level.
Your next response is going to be to downplay that incident and tell me to find another article. I am through playing these little kid games here and arguing things that are common knowledge. Believe what you want to believe. I am not even bashing him as a "bad Hawk" or suggesting he will be a problem. I saw a post that I disagreed with, and I responded to it. End of story on my end.
BS. You said it was well documented; provide some documentation or don't say it in the first place.
RiverDog wrote:Come on, guys. Harvin has had character question marks, both in the pros and in college. It was an issue in the draft and it was an issue for teams like the Hawks when the Vikings were looking to trade him.
Here's one:
http://www.twincities.com/ci_20357723/v ... ine-issues
And another...
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Dail ... ssues.aspx
I certainly don't mind you guys defending him as he's been on his best behavior here, but please, don't pretend that he's as pure as the wind driven snow.
Harvin seemingly has matured during his three seasons with Minnesota. He led the Vikings with 87 catches in 2011 and is considered a team leader. Last season, he won the Korey Stringer Good Guy award, given each year to a Vikings player who exemplifies professionalism when dealing with the media.
RiverDog wrote:Come on, guys. Harvin has had character question marks, both in the pros and in college. It was an issue in the draft and it was an issue for teams like the Hawks when the Vikings were looking to trade him.
Here's one:
http://www.twincities.com/ci_20357723/v ... ine-issues
And another...
http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Dail ... ssues.aspx
I certainly don't mind you guys defending him as he's been on his best behavior here, but please, don't pretend that he's as pure as the wind driven snow.
HumanCockroach wrote:I'm personally not "defending" him, just saying that something smells fishy in regards to his character concerns. Maybe he DID almost get kicked off his HS team, but seriously, his HS team? Good lord. How many times has Future trotted out the "young man" defense for guys in the pro's? I don't have really any issue with what Future said, or what RD has said, my issue stems from what seems to me to be a combination of Fans displeasure with "migraines and injuries" and a conflict of personalities with one of his coaching staffs.
When it comes to serious character issues, I tend to think of players that fight with team mates , whine to the press, or argue on the sideline with coaches, none of which has happened with Harvin that I can find anywhere. Maybe it happened in HS, it is certainly possible, however I feel like 10 years is probably enough time not to cling to that as some sort of verifiable proof that he currently has issues.
I've personally never heard a single team mate say anything but how incredible he is, and what an amazing teammate teammate, IF he was some sort of problem, I could understand current teammates saying that, but NOTHING coming out of Minnesota AFTER he was traded was in any way negative, which is why, I say something doesn't seem right.
Just don't believe in the theory that the media is always completely honest and forthright in regards to this stuff, and the actual facts don't seem to jive with the claims. I could care less what the fans in Minnesota, the media in Minnesota, or the former coaching staff in Minnesota feels about it, all I care about is what he does here, and how he does it, that said, I haven't read didly poo about what kind of cancer he was, that is verified in some sort of witnessed action. He had EVERY opportunity to express to the media his displeasure in Minnesota with the way he was being used and the staff, he didn't, he has had numerous opportunities to lash out at fans, teammates and the media, and he hasn't. Just doesn't coincide with the diva, character issue guy many have painted him as.
c_hawkbob wrote:First, I wasn't defending him, I was holding Future to account for his "well documented" statement.
Second, both your links are about his issues in college, not in the Pro's. In fact from the first link:Harvin seemingly has matured during his three seasons with Minnesota. He led the Vikings with 87 catches in 2011 and is considered a team leader. Last season, he won the Korey Stringer Good Guy award, given each year to a Vikings player who exemplifies professionalism when dealing with the media.
In fact, other than a minor, although public, disagreement with Childress as a rookie all his character issues seem to have been while in college.
I don't mind you taking Futures part in an argument, just don't overstate your case in the doing.
FolkCrusader wrote:You are seriously digging a hole here, RD. If that's the case Ricky Waters was the least behaved player in the history of the game. Matt Hasselbeck got in fights weekly with Holmgren. Getting excited on the sidelines with your coach is not a character concern. Disrespecting your coach on the sidelines is another problem.
Face it, you want to buy in to the media hype on this. Great, you eat media bias like cookies. If you want to call that conversation a fact of flawed character, ok. You win.
RiverDog wrote:FolkCrusader wrote:You are seriously digging a hole here, RD. If that's the case Ricky Waters was the least behaved player in the history of the game. Matt Hasselbeck got in fights weekly with Holmgren. Getting excited on the sidelines with your coach is not a character concern. Disrespecting your coach on the sidelines is another problem.
Face it, you want to buy in to the media hype on this. Great, you eat media bias like cookies. If you want to call that conversation a fact of flawed character, ok. You win.
Face it? You guys are the ones that need to face it. You're in serious denial if you attribute Harvin's problems to nothing more than media hype.
Here's a report about Harvin while at Florida:
It(Harvin's behavior) only got worse as Harvin’s career progressed. At one point during the 2008 season, multiple sources confirmed that Harvin, now a prominent member of the Minnesota Vikings, physically attacked wide receivers coach Billy Gonzales, grabbing him by the neck and throwing him to the ground. Harvin had to be pulled off Gonzales by two assistant coaches—but was never disciplined
http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-footba ... -will-musc
c_hawkbob wrote:I don't think he's buying the media hype, I think he just likes cutting against the grain.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests