NorthHawk wrote:I thought I read somewhere that Darnold probably won't play and if he does it will only be for a series.
Maybe I'm wrong about that but if it happens then we should see a lot of Milroe.
But for me, I want to see how the Offense performs - not the success rate, but rather the style and how the new Offensive Coaches use the players and the blocking schemes.
River Dog wrote:Well, we must be on the downhill side of summer as the first preseason game is tomorrow night, 7pm PDT kickoff on NFL Network. It's the third game of a triple header, although only two appear on NFL Network.
Since my bedtime is commonly around 8-9pm, I'll record it and watch it later. If it were a regular season game, I'd change my sleeping habits. But not for a stinking preseason game. I'm hoping to see a lot of Jalen Milroe and our Kam Chancellor-like safety we traded up to get.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Time to get rolling. Let's hope to find some gems. At least it will be more hopeful than the Mariners endless wasting of a great pitching staff because ownership is unwilling to spend on bats.
Stream Hawk wrote:Have you not followed the Mariners the last couple weeks? Their offense is basically stacked now. But overall their ownership definitely doesn’t spend in the off-season.
Stream Hawk wrote:I think we take the division. The AL is very winnable this year. Cal’s actually slumping a lot now, and Julio is heating up per the late summer norm. I’d love it if this team were sold or Stanton steps down, but neither is likely soon.
Our excellent farm system combined with trader saviness of Jerry/Justin may just beat the system. I am not impressed with their mgr decisions. Neither Dan nor Scott had experience - and it showed.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Time to get rolling. Let's hope to find some gems. At least it will be more hopeful than the Mariners endless wasting of a great pitching staff because ownership is unwilling to spend on bats.
Stream Hawk wrote:Have you not followed the Mariners the last couple weeks? Their offense is basically stacked now. But overall their ownership definitely doesn’t spend in the off-season.
River Dog wrote:It's pretty easy to complain about ownership, kinda like complaining about your boss. They've had to make some tough calls over the past few years. I tend to be a little more forgiving.
They've made some very good moves down the stretch, in particular bringing in Josh Naylor. I don't know if they can win the division, but they should make the playoffs where anything can happen. It's nice to have them doing well as my interest level in baseball has waned significantly over the years due mostly to the troubles the Mariners have had.
Aseahawkfan wrote:You always are a strange contradiction. You act like the Seahawks aren't pushing hard enough to win when they have been far more successful than the Mariners, than act magnanimous for 20 years of futility and unwillingness to spend by Mariners ownership.
In baseball, you buy championships with rare exception. You really want to win in the MLB, you build a great team from your farm league which the Mariners have managed to do with the pitching staff and players like Cal and Julio, then when you have that core you spend big on bringing in some big bats and supplement pitchers and really go after the World Series.
That's how the MLB works. If your ownership can't look down and go, "We got a hella of a core built, we need to go all in now while we have this strong core", then you're going to end up as the Mariners have been for the past 20 years and really their whole existence other than that brief period in the mid 90s to 2001.
Forgiving? That has nothing to do with it. Mariners have produced no results and don't know what to do when they do have some results that if then went in big, would give them a real shot at winning it all.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests