NorthHawk wrote:It looks like we will be playing without DK, so it will be even tougher.
On a side note it will give us a glimpse of what it would be like if we traded DK as in a prior thread.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:The Bills have a good record, but their wins have come against weak teams. Allen's performances have been strong vs weak teams and weak vs strong teams. I don't think they are as good as their record much like how the Seahawks 3-0 start was misleading.
Rest assured, the Seahawks are not the Ravens or the Texans, but the Bills aren't way ahead of the Seahawks.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:I don't know which one shows up Sunday. The one that played the Giants likely loses this one. The one that beat the Falcons could very well pull it off.
c_hawkbob wrote:Not that I'm pretending to be in Schneider's and MacD's heads but I don't think trading DK was ever anything more than a fan driven 'what if' scenario. I know most don't agree with me on this but I see DK as a future HOFer.
River Dog wrote:I agree completely. That's why I said that this one is tough to pick. I'm leaning towards picking the Bills simply due to the QB they're facing and the year he's having. We're going to need some turnovers if we're going to pull out a win, and Allen hasn't been turning the ball over this season. Turnovers have been the one thing that's kept Allen and the Bills from taking that next step.
There are a whole slew of teams in the NFC with 2-3 losses, 7 to be exact, nearly half the conference. We're one of those teams who are still trying to sort themselves out, contenders or pretenders. We'll know more by Sunday evening as to which category we fall under.
River Dog wrote:I agree completely. That's why I said that this one is tough to pick. I'm leaning towards picking the Bills simply due to the QB they're facing and the year he's having. We're going to need some turnovers if we're going to pull out a win, and Allen hasn't been turning the ball over this season. Turnovers have been the one thing that's kept Allen and the Bills from taking that next step.
There are a whole slew of teams in the NFC with 2-3 losses, 7 to be exact, nearly half the conference. We're one of those teams who are still trying to sort themselves out, contenders or pretenders. We'll know more by Sunday evening as to which category we fall under.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:The Ravens kept Allen to 55% completion; Texans kept him to 30%. It was 180 and 130 yards, respectively. Both of these were away games, and both were the only losses for the Bills thus far. The Seahawks have to find a way to get the better of Allen the way these two did.
MackStrongIsMyHero wrote:That’s real. If they could not slow down Jones, it definitely calls into question finding a way to get the better of Allen. Need the offense to keep Allen on the side lines as much as possible.
River Dog wrote:Did you see that graphic? 2 minutes left in the 3rd quarter, and we have 3 yards rushing.
4XPIPS wrote:Not that it would make muck difference now, but on that bad snap that Walker scooped up, instead of running with it and taking a massive loss he should have thrown the ball away. It was a pass play and most of line man were pass blocking, if not it would have been either an incomplete pass or illegal man down field which would have been a penalty and save the down, but instead he took a massive loss of yards on that play. Either way, this game is over
Aseahawkfan wrote:Bills are out of our league. If we're this inconsistent from week to week, then we're not really contenders. You don't make it through the playoffs this inconsistent. That's fine. We weren't going to build into a contender this quick. I think we all want real contention, not just punch our ticket and one and done in the playoffs. We've done that for years and being a yearly lower tier playoff team that isn't really competitive hoping for some magic to happen is not what I want to be. I want to be a real contender that can go head to head with the best.
NorthHawk wrote:This is a complete change of philosophy on both sides. It’s going to take time.
Pete wasn’t particularly good the first year, either with some good games and some bad games.
What we need is an off season like we had in 2012 when we loaded up in the draft. I don’t expect that to happen, but a couple of solid drafts where they can get players that fit their schemes and can provide the culture that the FO wants.
This year is the first year for MacDonald and Grubb to really evaluate the players when in the heat of battle.
They’re only 8 games into their evaluations and they may never be successful but they need time to really show what they can do. I think if they get the right players the team can become a force because some of the pieces are in place and they’re not starting from scratch but they consistently get beat because of the failures in the trenches as has happened for the last 7 or 8 years.
c_hawkbob wrote:Connor Williams just cost us 2 scores.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests