River Dog wrote:I'm penciling this in as a win, too. The Giants' offense hasn't done much, but their defense has been solid, so conventional wisdom would dictate a low scoring game. But getting K9 back in the lineup was huge, and I expect him to have another big game, cracking the century mark in rushing yards. I also don't expect Daniel Jones to go 18-for-18. Byron Murphy, Tyrell Dodson, and Boye Mafe didn't practice yesterday, but Williams, Baker, Love, and even Nwosu did practice, albeit it limited, so we should be a little closer to full strength than we were against the Lions.
But it's a classic trap game. We have a huge game coming up a week from today vs. the Niners, and there's the chance that we'll be looking past the Giants and taking them for granted. Nevertheless, I think we win handily.
Hawks 31, Giants 14.
River Dog wrote:I'm penciling this in as a win, too. The Giants' offense hasn't done much, but their defense has been solid, so conventional wisdom would dictate a low scoring game. But getting K9 back in the lineup was huge, and I expect him to have another big game, cracking the century mark in rushing yards. I also don't expect Daniel Jones to go 18-for-18. Byron Murphy, Tyrell Dodson, and Boye Mafe didn't practice yesterday, but Williams, Baker, Love, and even Nwosu did practice, albeit it limited, so we should be a little closer to full strength than we were against the Lions.
But it's a classic trap game. We have a huge game coming up a week from today vs. the Niners, and there's the chance that we'll be looking past the Giants and taking them for granted. Nevertheless, I think we win handily.
Hawks 31, Giants 14.
4XPIPS wrote:I like the dominant score, but I just got this feeling the way refs are flagging our games lately, this will be a penalty fest game on both sides, and most likely kill a few good drives.
River Dog wrote:Interesting that you mentioned penalties as I was about to start a thread about them.
You're right, we have had a lot of penalties called on us, 32, which makes us the 6th most penalized team in the league. However, we an even higher beneficiary count, 34, tied for 3rd highest in that category, of penalties that have gone in our favor. It's a similar story with penalty yardage, as we've had 253 against yards vs. 288 beneficiary yards. That doesn't mean that we aren't the victim of a bias, just that there isn't any empirical evidence to support such a claim. Personally, I've never bought into the conspiracy theories that the refs/league is out to get us.
There are more penalties being called league wide this season. Last year, there were 11.3 accepted penalties called per game. After 64 games this season, that average is 13.2, or an increase of about 17% over last season. We seem to be involved in games where a lot of penalties are thrown. The last two games, we've had a total of 20 accepted penalties assessed against us and 23 that went against our opponents. That's 21.5 penalties a game in our past two contests vs. a league average of 13.2.
If you're really interested, there's a pretty good site that tracks penalties:
https://www.nflpenalties.com/
4XPIPS wrote:I agree with you. I don't think we have been targeted as a team, but I think DK is on the minds of the refs. He seems to be averaging and OPI or holding call per game. He does push off almost on every play(surprised he isn't called for more OPIs), but because he dwarfs almost any CB out there it looks more egregious. His holding penalties are easy to call on most outside run plays, and that is on him 100% of the time because when the tailback is bouncing to the outside, DK is usually on the outside blocking the corner, and it's just an easy call to make. I would say DK needs to clean it up, but I don't want him to lose that physical nature he embodies out there. However, as massive as he is as a WR he just sticks out.
jshawaii22 wrote:This is a trap game, with a short week and SF 49ers coming in next.
We also had to travel to Detroit for a MNF game, while the Giants had 4 extra days of rest for this game, coming off a Thursday night game.
I just saw this on morning football: Going back to last year, teams that play Detroit, have lost by an average of 14 points the following week,
Injuries: We had 20 players listed, but only 4 "out" and two of those was PT. It seems that most of our defense that missed last week may be coming back, but who knows at what level as they are all listed as "questionable" - the last couple of weeks, most of the players with that designation have played Sunday.
Biggest injury news is that Giants great rookie receiver, Malik Nabers is out. He is something like 60% of the offense and looked really good.
Spread has moved Tuesdays 5 1/2 to 7 this morning, so evidently we're supposed to win. I agree, 24-13 Hawks.
c_hawkbob wrote:Well tied at the half is best case for us, hopefully we can make some adjustments.
Oly wrote:Avatar for Oly
Hawks have no business being tied, or even in the game. They got lucky. I can't think of a moment more important in showing us Macdonald's coaching chops than if his adjustments can turn this around.
Stream Hawk wrote:Geno s*** the bed in this one. So did defense. And definitely coaching takes the cake. Niners are looking to kick our ass on Thursday night. I hate to say it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests