NorthHawk wrote:Pete has done a lot for Seattle football but his time has pretty much come to an end.
He’s had 5 years to fix the Defense and it’s still not performing well enough to compete at the highest level. He’s
even abandoned his 4-3 under scheme in an effort to improve it to no avail. He’s given up his Offensive philosophy
and that seems to have worked but we’re still in a severe talent deficit with holes all over the lineup.
I really appreciate he brought a championship and he should be celebrated for that but we’ve only won 1 playoff game
the last 6 or so years. Meanwhile the Rams have won a SB and the 49ers have gone deep into the playoffs while we watched from the sidelines.
Some people may be happy with just being competitive, but I’m one of those who thinks we should strive for a lot more.
NorthHawk wrote:Pete has done a lot for Seattle football but his time has pretty much come to an end.
He’s had 5 years to fix the Defense and it’s still not performing well enough to compete at the highest level. He’s
even abandoned his 4-3 under scheme in an effort to improve it to no avail. He’s given up his Offensive philosophy
and that seems to have worked but we’re still in a severe talent deficit with holes all over the lineup.
I really appreciate he brought a championship and he should be celebrated for that but we’ve only won 1 playoff game
the last 6 or so years. Meanwhile the Rams have won a SB and the 49ers have gone deep into the playoffs while we watched from the sidelines.
Some people may be happy with just being competitive, but I’m one of those who thinks we should strive for a lot more.
obiken wrote:IF I could trade off Pete for Sean Peyton, or a Stefanski, I would do it in a heartbeat River!
TriCitySam wrote:They had a good season, a great draft and some areas improved. They're in position to improve with a good draft this year....but the armchair's keep whining. Take away the LOB years, in the past 5 years out of 32 teams only 5 (FIVE) have more wins than Seattle. Very hard to win in the NFL - that is a pretty good job by JS and PC.
TriCitySam wrote:They had a good season, a great draft and some areas improved. They're in position to improve with a good draft this year....but the armchair's keep whining. Take away the LOB years, in the past 5 years out of 32 teams only 5 (FIVE) have more wins than Seattle. Very hard to win in the NFL - that is a pretty good job by JS and PC.
TriCitySam wrote:They had a good season, a great draft and some areas improved. They're in position to improve with a good draft this year....but the armchair's keep whining. Take away the LOB years, in the past 5 years out of 32 teams only 5 (FIVE) have more wins than Seattle. Very hard to win in the NFL - that is a pretty good job by JS and PC.
Hawktawk wrote:How many playoff wins?
That's the measuring stick.
If you want to wallow in the middle and never be ready to challenge for a championship, then fine, but many if not most want to have some hope for the future.
Sitting in the middle and having a winning season over and over just doesn't cut it. Not good enough to go deep into the playoffs and not bad enough to rebuild.
That's not much to be pleased about.
That's your measuring stick - teams that fire winning coaches for that reason become long term losers - it's not a mindset that works for a long term winner. I don't want to be the Texans or the Jets or the Cardinals rolling thru coaches and not being competitive.
NorthHawk wrote:
Any team not striving for a championship and not making the necessary changes is simply trying for a
participation badge. That may be good enough for elementary school but it doesn’t cut it in Pro Sports.
In the middle is in the middle of nowhere.
TriCitySam wrote:That's your measuring stick - teams that fire winning coaches for that reason become long term losers - it's not a mindset that works for a long term winner. I don't want to be the Texans or the Jets or the Cardinals rolling thru coaches and not being competitive.
RiverDog wrote:Boy, Marty Schottenheimer would have sure loved to have been working for you.
Andy Reid had a 130-93-1 record as the Philadelphia Eagles' head coach when they fired him after the 2012 season. Since then, they've had 3 head coaches, so they must be like the Jets and Cardinals, rolling through coaches and not being competitive, right? Wrong. All 3 coaches since Reid posted overall winning records for the Eagles, they won the Super Bowl once, and had the league's best record this season.
The point is that if we were to fire Pete...and I'm not saying that we should...it doesn't mean that we're destined to become a long term loser. All it would mean is that we're turning the page to the next chapter of Seahawk football.
TriCitySam wrote:That's your measuring stick - teams that fire winning coaches for that reason become long term losers - it's not a mindset that works for a long term winner. I don't want to be the Texans or the Jets or the Cardinals rolling thru coaches and not being competitive.
RiverDog wrote:Boy, Marty Schottenheimer would have sure loved to have been working for you.
Andy Reid had a 130-93-1 record as the Philadelphia Eagles' head coach when they fired him after the 2012 season. Since then, they've had 3 head coaches, so they must be like the Jets and Cardinals, rolling through coaches and not being competitive, right? Wrong. All 3 coaches since Reid posted overall winning records for the Eagles, they won the Super Bowl once, and had the league's best record this season.
The point is that if we were to fire Pete...and I'm not saying that we should...it doesn't mean that we're destined to become a long term loser. All it would mean is that we're turning the page to the next chapter of Seahawk football.
Hawktawk wrote:Marty Schottenheimer was the most snakebit great coach in history. He was the Greg Norman of NFL HCs except Greg did get one major, should have had 4 or 5. Schottie last opportunity in the league ended with a 14-2 or 13-3 team in the AFC title game when some players on his Chargers team lost their cool in the final seconds and advanced the Pats to the super bowl.
Last I checked they haven't done a goddamn thing since. God rest his soul by the way.
He was a hell of a great coach, like Knox. Not all great coaches win one. Some franchises dont have one . Some have never gone to one much less win one.
When we talk about guys living in the past maybe we're talking about Shula with not a single championship in Marinos amazing career. But what the hell have they won since?
Eagles and Reid? Yeah I suppose but hes got something Siriani doesn't have, A Lombardi. He's looking real good right now and maybe a reunion with his old team in the big one! wouldnt that be fun.
The weird thing with Peterson is he did something Vermeil and Reid and Rhodes and whoever the hell else went through there didn't. Win it all. won it all with NICK FOLES AT QB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Beat GOAT squared. Had Foles catch a pass on 4th down for a TD to shame Belichick. Next year we eliminated them with 50 year old Josh McCown after Wendz pulled up lame self reporting concussion symptoms. A year later unemployed .
I said when Pete looked to be a bit shaky get that guy if Pete leaves. Well Jax did and the man coached up a team to win a playoff game with a QB who threw 4 picks. I know a guy who did that too...........
When Siriano or what the hell gets his lombardi with Hurts=Wilson we can say the Eagles know what they are doing cause if he dont win it all at least once and they and all of us watch Pedersen develop Jax into a power the eagles are gonna look like a stupid organization that got lucky once in the last 40 years . LIke Dallas. Maybe Pederson can get a reunion. Good luck though Eagles aint happening this year.
Seattle? Playoffs 10 of 13, lombardi and 2 superbowl apperances, even playoffs with half the roster new. I think Ive talked myself into another year of this loser has been Carroll.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Pete isn't a loser. He's already won a Lombardi. Most coaches never do that. So he can't be a loser when he's already won.
Pete's legacy is set. Now he's adding to it.
Not sure why you're calling him a loser.
Old but Slow wrote:About whether Pete goes or stays, I believe that it will be his decision. They won't fire him.
Hawktawk wrote:Marty Schottenheimer was the most snakebit great coach in history. He was the Greg Norman of NFL HCs except Greg did get one major, should have had 4 or 5. Schottie last opportunity in the league ended with a 14-2 or 13-3 team in the AFC title game when some players on his Chargers team lost their cool in the final seconds and advanced the Pats to the super bowl.
Last I checked they haven't done a goddamn thing since. God rest his soul by the way.
He was a hell of a great coach, like Knox. Not all great coaches win one. Some franchises dont have one . Some in have never gone to one much less win one.
When we talk about guys living in the past maybe we're talking about Shula with not a single championship in Marinos amazing career. But what the hell have they won since?
Eagles and Reid? Yeah I suppose but hes got something Siriani doesn't have, A Lombardi. He's looking real good right now and maybe a reunion with his old team in the big one! wouldnt that be fun.
The weird thing with Peterson is he did something Vermeil and Reid and Rhodes and whoever the hell else went through there didn't. Win it all. won it all with NICK FOLES AT QB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Beat GOAT squared. Had Foles catch a pass on 4th down for a TD to shame Belichick. Next year we eliminated them with 50 year old Josh McCown after Wendz pulled up lame self reporting concussion symptoms. A year later unemployed .
I said when Pete looked to be a bit shaky get that guy if Pete leaves. Well Jax did and the man coached up a team to win a playoff game with a QB who threw 4 picks. I know a guy who did that too...........
When Siriano or what the hell gets his lombardi with Hurts=Wilson we can say the Eagles know what they are doing cause if he dont win it all at least once and they and all of us watch Pedersen develop Jax into a power the eagles are gonna look like a stupid organization that got lucky once in the last 40 years . LIke Dallas. Maybe Pederson can get a reunion. Good luck though Eagles aint happening this year.
Seattle? Playoffs 10 of 13, lombardi and 2 superbowl apperances, even playoffs with half the roster new. I think Ive talked myself into another year of this loser has been Carroll.
Old but Slow wrote:Nice post HT, and I agree with your view of Peterson.
About whether Pete goes or stays, I believe that it will be his decision. They won't fire him.
Hawktawk wrote:And I’ll paraphrase most if not many right on the forum . “ Jodi is a dummy that got swindled into trading Russ by the diabolical John and Pete “
Then it works well but oh well Jodi dont know a damn thing . The headless monster that is the Seahawks got lucky .![]()
Pete kisses her ….in the media all the time . He gets it .
NorthHawk wrote:HT lives in his own world some times making up things nobody said or implied.
Nobody thinks Jody is a dummy, nor does anyone think she runs the show like a female Jerry Jones.
Most likely she listens to all sides including the people from Vulcan along with JS and PC, but lately less of PC as he mentioned.
She then makes as informed a decision as she can given the information provided.
RiverDog wrote:Yeah, I'm not sure how he started that narrative, either. The worst I've ever said about Jody is that she's not a football person, something that she's said about herself. I haven't seen a poster in here say anything that could be interpreted as mean or corrosive. Her management style is a true mystery, even more so than her brother's, but if I had to guess, I'd say that she has 2-3 people at Vulcan that she trusts as close advisors.
RiverDog wrote:Let's get the record straight. At the end of last season, I was of the opinion that one of them, ie Pete or Russell, had to go, that the marriage was over. My initial preference was for Pete to go, but after it became apparent that Pete was staying, I was on board with the Russell trade when it happened. And I was never critical of Jodi for making the trade or suggested that she got swindled.
So please, stop with this self-adulation. You're not the only one that was for trading Russell.
Aseahawkfan wrote:So as far as this being some kind of settled affair, John and Pete aren't safe yet. You can bank on that. They gotta show more improvement and an ability to compete against a division opponent like the 49ers. Right now we don't even look in the same league as them.
TriCitySam wrote:So, you are suggesting John and Pete are in danger of not returning for the '23 season?
NorthHawk wrote:HT lives in his own world some times making up things nobody said or implied.
Nobody thinks Jody is a dummy, nor does anyone think she runs the show like a female Jerry Jones.
Most likely she listens to all sides including the people from Vulcan along with JS and PC, but lately less of PC as he mentioned.
She then makes as informed a decision as she can given the information provided.
RiverDog wrote:Yeah, I'm not sure how he started that narrative, either. The worst I've ever said about Jody is that she's not a football person, something that she's said about herself. I haven't seen a poster in here say anything that could be interpreted as mean or corrosive. Her management style is a true mystery, even more so than her brother's, but if I had to guess, I'd say that she has 2-3 people at Vulcan that she trusts as close advisors.
RiverDog wrote:Since it seems that we've turned this thread into a Jody Allen thread, here's some excerpts from the first article that popped up in my search:
'Toxic’ Trail Blazers owner Jody Allen should sell team, say insiders
It’s the NBA’s biggest battle — only off the court. Nike founder Phil Knight has made a $2 billion bid to buy the Portland Trail Blazers from owner Jody Allen, who has been embroiled in allegations of sexual harassment and bad behavior. But Allen, 63, who is reportedly worth more than $20 billion, issued a defiant statement Tuesday, saying that she won’t sell the team her brother, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen left her after his 2018 death.
Sources told The Post, there is growing disarray behind the scenes. A highly placed team staffer alleged that Jody’s “toxic behavior” — dating back to allegations of harassing bodyguards and violating US import laws — has spilled over into the management of the team.
In November, Blazers CEO/President Chris McGowan — who also served as CEO of Vulcan Sports & Entertainment, the company founded by the Allens — quit after nine years, allegedly because of frustration with Jody and Kolde. “The Trail Blazers are not as successful as they could have been. Jody is deferring everything to Bert, and he is not the right guy for the team,” Miller said.
Kolde was Paul Allen’s college roommate and friend. “He always had these issues that didn’t make sense. Paul would consult [Kolde], but [Paul] would make the decisions,” Miller added. “Jody’s letting Bert make all the decisions now.
According to Miller, Jody even refused to take Knight’s call when the Nike founder, who has an estimated fortune of $54.5 billion, put his initial offer together: “She did not take Phil’s call. She deferred him to Bert.”
She has also refused to talk to Blazers star player Damian Lillard, who reportedly has had issues with the way the team is being run, the team source claimed. “Damian wanted to sit down and have a conversation with Jody about the team and she didn’t return his call. Then he tried to email her. Eventually she just never responded and put him in touch with Bert,” the source alleged. “When you own a team, there are critical key decisions to make and you should be the one involved in making the decisions.”
For years, Jody and Paul had to face accusations of bad behavior. In 2013, the siblings settled with two of their former security chiefs who accused them of smuggling, bribery and sexual harassment.
A settlement was reached in November 2013 before the case went in front of a jury. At least 15 former members of the Allens’ personal security detail brought civil claims against them, with 13 eventually settling out of court. While under oath, Jody also declined to address allegations that she purchased tight, European-cut swim trunks for the men guarding her and requested they perform a “fashion show.”
https://nypost.com/2022/07/07/insiders- ... sell-team/
RiverDog wrote:Since it seems that we've turned this thread into a Jody Allen thread, here's some excerpts from the first article that popped up in my search:
'Toxic’ Trail Blazers owner Jody Allen should sell team, say insiders
It’s the NBA’s biggest battle — only off the court. Nike founder Phil Knight has made a $2 billion bid to buy the Portland Trail Blazers from owner Jody Allen, who has been embroiled in allegations of sexual harassment and bad behavior. But Allen, 63, who is reportedly worth more than $20 billion, issued a defiant statement Tuesday, saying that she won’t sell the team her brother, Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen left her after his 2018 death.
Sources told The Post, there is growing disarray behind the scenes. A highly placed team staffer alleged that Jody’s “toxic behavior” — dating back to allegations of harassing bodyguards and violating US import laws — has spilled over into the management of the team.
In November, Blazers CEO/President Chris McGowan — who also served as CEO of Vulcan Sports & Entertainment, the company founded by the Allens — quit after nine years, allegedly because of frustration with Jody and Kolde. “The Trail Blazers are not as successful as they could have been. Jody is deferring everything to Bert, and he is not the right guy for the team,” Miller said.
Kolde was Paul Allen’s college roommate and friend. “He always had these issues that didn’t make sense. Paul would consult [Kolde], but [Paul] would make the decisions,” Miller added. “Jody’s letting Bert make all the decisions now.
According to Miller, Jody even refused to take Knight’s call when the Nike founder, who has an estimated fortune of $54.5 billion, put his initial offer together: “She did not take Phil’s call. She deferred him to Bert.”
She has also refused to talk to Blazers star player Damian Lillard, who reportedly has had issues with the way the team is being run, the team source claimed. “Damian wanted to sit down and have a conversation with Jody about the team and she didn’t return his call. Then he tried to email her. Eventually she just never responded and put him in touch with Bert,” the source alleged. “When you own a team, there are critical key decisions to make and you should be the one involved in making the decisions.”
For years, Jody and Paul had to face accusations of bad behavior. In 2013, the siblings settled with two of their former security chiefs who accused them of smuggling, bribery and sexual harassment.
A settlement was reached in November 2013 before the case went in front of a jury. At least 15 former members of the Allens’ personal security detail brought civil claims against them, with 13 eventually settling out of court. While under oath, Jody also declined to address allegations that she purchased tight, European-cut swim trunks for the men guarding her and requested they perform a “fashion show.”
https://nypost.com/2022/07/07/insiders- ... sell-team/
Hawktawk wrote:Wow .
Of course it’s “insiders “ and disgruntled former employees as sources . But it’s seamy conduct for sure . I’d say with the house cleaning a year ago there’s bad blood . And the dirt comes out .
As for Phil Knight I have a good friend in Newport who helped build Rogue ale brewery and sat on the board at Nike . He’s well acquainted with Phil and he’s no choirboy either . Most billionaires have their quirks . This is a dispute between people with many billions of dollars . Not sure Lillards beef . I hadn’t heard it publicly . If there’s a word of caution about cleaning house they missed the postseason again afterwards . But nice hit piece .
I guess if making security guards prance in swimsuits is sue worthy how about maintaining a hotel suite and furnishing NDAs for the star qb to sexually assault women . Or ross paying to lose games . Or Snyder . Jerry Jones anyone ? Bob Irsay ? Bidwell?
Need some perspective I think .
There has not been a peep about this type of conduct with Seattle . So it’s confusing . I’m sure you will give her the benefit of the doubt you give the dudes accused of stuff like this .
RiverDog wrote: '
There has not been a peep about this type of conduct with Seattle . So it’s confusing . I’m sure you will give her the benefit of the doubt you give the dudes accused of stuff like this .
RiverDog wrote:There's no doubt that rich people present themselves as a huge target for extortion and blackmail, but 15 former employees from their security detail seems like a pretty high percentage. How many people do they employ as security guards/agents?
Hawktawk wrote:25 navy seals on the yacht Octopus.
RiverDog wrote:As far as what other owners have done, two wrongs don't make a right. It's absolutely no defense if these accusations are true. Besides, the sexual stuff wasn't what I was alluding to so much as it was the talk about Jody's deferring decisions to others and being detached from the overall management of the Blazers. It contradicts your opinion of her management style.
Hawktawk wrote:Its an account of Jodis conduct from second hand and unnamed sources in some part. I guess if Bert Kolde fired everyone without her maybe it's true shes detached. If hes her GM its not unusual for an owner of any business to use their GM as a conduit to employees. Its how my owner deals with it and it drives me nuts not having my own voice for the first time in 38 years, But hes allegedly worth 200 million and he can do what he wants. Like Jodi. Proves nothing.
Hawktawk wrote:As for Phil Knight calling her directly and her not taking it good for her. Hes attempting a hostile takeover and she wants nothing to do with him. All the blazers prove to me is she will fire someone. Seattle's been different as John speaks with her regularly according to Pete who doesn't. He said in 21 he comes to a meeting when she tells him to. As for all this other garbage from 10 years ago my point to you is how many times i've heard the words gold digger from you every time someone gets accused. Even watson I had it explained that these asian masseuses' ase pretty shady themselves, maybe some out for money.
How about if someone has 62 billion? would they be a target? Its all Im saying. Allens have quite a bit of latitude with me .
Hawktawk wrote:Wow .
Of course it’s “insiders “ and disgruntled former employees as sources . But it’s seamy conduct for sure . I’d say with the house cleaning a year ago there’s bad blood . And the dirt comes out .
As for Phil Knight I have a good friend in Newport who helped build Rogue ale brewery and sat on the board at Nike . He’s well acquainted with Phil and he’s no choirboy either . Most billionaires have their quirks . This is a dispute between people with many billions of dollars . Not sure Lillards beef . I hadn’t heard it publicly . If there’s a word of caution about cleaning house they missed the postseason again afterwards . But nice hit piece .
I guess if making security guards prance in swimsuits is sue worthy how about maintaining a hotel suite and furnishing NDAs for the star qb to sexually assault women . Or ross paying to lose games . Or Snyder . Jerry Jones anyone ? Bob Irsay ? Bidwell?
Need some perspective I think .
There has not been a peep about this type of conduct with Seattle . So it’s confusing . I’m sure you will give her the benefit of the doubt you give the dudes accused of stuff like this .
Users browsing this forum: jshawaii22 and 44 guests