RiverDog wrote:To be fair, in that analysis, we took a big hit, both in terms of draft capital, two #1 picks, and salary due to the Jamal Adams trade and contract extension, something that none of the other teams have experienced, and we've gotten very little in return due to at least in part to the injuries he's suffered.
Old but Slow wrote:In our last 10 drafts we have taken 5 defensive tackles in the first three rounds. In the 2d we took McDowell '17, Reed '16. In the 3d we took Rasheem Green '18, Naz Jones '17, and Jordan Hill "13. Collier is the only defensive lineman taken in the first, and he is listed as a defensive end. Other DTs we took are Quinten Jefferson and a bunch of jags. Remember Demarcus Christmas, round 6 in '17, Kristian Sokoli round 6 '15, Jimmy Staten rd 5 ''14, Jesse Williams rd 5 '13, and Jared Smith rd 7 '13.
Currently we have Woods from a trade, Mone and Ford who were undrafted, as was Adams. Jefferson was drafted in the 5th round in '16.
In the last ten drafts we have not found a single defensive tackle worth a first round choice? Sounds like neglect to me.
Defensive end is better. The picks the last few years have included Collier, the only first, but also Mafe, Tyreke Smith (who was injured this year), Taylor, Robinson and Frank Clark. Before that we took Obum Gwatchum, Cassius Marsh, and Ty Powell.
How can a coach with a rep as a defensive mastermind allow his defensive line to be approached this way?
Hawktawk wrote:As awesome as Pete and john have done on the balance I’m tired of this defense . Nauseated .
NorthHawk wrote:Desai is interviewing for the Browns DC.
Isn't that a step down from being an Associate Defensive HC?
If so, does it mean that we are considering the 3-4 as somewhat of a failure and going to move back to a 4-3?
Maybe I'm just reading something into this that's not there.
NorthHawk wrote:Desai is interviewing for the Browns DC.
Isn't that a step down from being an Associate Defensive HC?
If so, does it mean that we are considering the 3-4 as somewhat of a failure and going to move back to a 4-3?
Maybe I'm just reading something into this that's not there.
Didn't Pete comment on this a week or 2 ago? Or am I imagining it? I swear he stated there would be no scheme changes. Maybe he changes his mind if Desai leaves, though. They really don't have enough proper players for a 3-4 right now but that can change with the draft.
Hawktawk wrote:As awesome as Pete and john have done on the balance I’m tired of this defense . Nauseated .
NorthHawk wrote:Desai is interviewing for the Browns DC.
Isn't that a step down from being an Associate Defensive HC?
If so, does it mean that we are considering the 3-4 as somewhat of a failure and going to move back to a 4-3?
Maybe I'm just reading something into this that's not there.
Hawktawk wrote:Here we go quoting yards again.How about points ? I know this year we were 4th in scoring at one point.
Hawktawk wrote:Reading comprehension needed . I said we were top 5 in WINS last 13 years .
NorthHawk wrote:This years draft is crucial for the future of the franchise. We know what’s needed but will they go back to playing the trade down past top talent game again or will they take solid players at positions of need? With 4 picks in the top 51, we can’t afford to
miss on many like we have done in the past.
Hawktawk wrote:Have not looked it up but I bet our scoring defense was better last year with Norton and lots of these same guys . Why did we do this ?
Hawktawk wrote:Reading comprehension needed . I said we were top 5 in WINS last 13 years .
Hawktawk wrote:Your not a fan of pete. You never have been . But its ridiculous to say we've been an also ran in the last 8 years. 31 teams are every year. Losing in the Divisional or championship or super bowl is a loser, an also ran.
Hawktawk wrote:If you get to the tournament year after year you have a chance.
Hawktawk wrote:Saying we have been an also ran for 8 years is utterly ridiculous. hate speech
NorthHawk wrote:Every year is important of course, but this year is even more so because we have set most of the base in last years draft and we have to both finish that work and look to the future.
If we mess it up we will continue to flounder in limbo or sink to the bottom, but if we hit on another group of real good players we can set up for the long term.
NorthHawk wrote:I'm hoping last years draft actually opened their eyes, but I have no faith that they can build a decent OL and am now wondering if they can build a DL either.
After making a shambles of the IOL after Unger was traded 8 years ago they still haven't addressed it properly and it's been about 5 years since the DL has been any good.
We've kept treading water as a result but never getting good enough to challenge after the championship years.
It all starts along the LoS.
Hawktawk wrote:Your not a fan of pete. You never have been . But its ridiculous to say we've been an also ran in the last 8 years. 31 teams are every year. Losing in the Divisional or championship or super bowl is a loser, an also ran.
Hawktawk wrote:If you get to the tournament year after year you have a chance.
Hawktawk wrote:Saying we have been an also ran for 8 years is utterly ridiculous. hate speech
Hawktawk wrote:You've more or less called Pete a dunce, liar (used car salesman) etc. .
Hawktawk wrote:I won’t play tit for tat . You criticize Pete a lot . I’ll leave it there . Used car salesman suggests dishonest to me although I’ve used the term as well. Pete’s not perfect . He’s been great though .
Hawktawk wrote:I won’t play tit for tat . You criticize Pete a lot . I’ll leave it there . Used car salesman suggests dishonest to me although I’ve used the term as well. Pete’s not perfect . He’s been great though .
RiverDog wrote:The used car salesman or some similar moniker, yes. But that's not what got me going. You suggested that I called Pete a dunce, or something to that effect. Not once have I EVER even remotely suggested that Pete was anything less than a very smart man. And there's a difference between calling or suggesting that someone is being intentionally dishonest in one or two statements, which Pete undeniably has been, and calling him a liar. A 'liar' means that they are perpetually and blatantly dishonest. It's a difference in frequency and scale.
As far as criticizing Pete, of course, I do. I've also criticized my boss, my parents, my teachers, my wife, my close friends. It doesn't mean that I don't like or respect them.
And lastly, I've always indicated that I have a very deep appreciation for what Pete has done here. Yes, he has been great, given us the best period of Seahawk football in franchise history, including our only Lombardi. But what has he done for us lately? IMO not near enough.
Having said all of that, I'll repeat my position on Pete's continuance as our HC. I am not quite there as far as calling for his head. I am not at all pleased with his performance over the past 8 seasons, but this past year, in particular the results of the Russell trade, his management of the 2022 draft, and the success of some aspects of our team this season has caused me to pull back a bit on what I was calling for at the end of last season. But I'm not going to vigorously defend him, either. My personal preference is that he retire and hand the reins over to someone else, but I could live with him for another season.
RiverDog wrote:The used car salesman or some similar moniker, yes. But that's not what got me going. You suggested that I called Pete a dunce, or something to that effect. Not once have I EVER even remotely suggested that Pete was anything less than a very smart man. And there's a difference between calling or suggesting that someone is being intentionally dishonest in one or two statements, which Pete undeniably has been, and calling him a liar. A 'liar' means that they are perpetually and blatantly dishonest. It's a difference in frequency and scale.
As far as criticizing Pete, of course, I do. I've also criticized my boss, my parents, my teachers, my wife, my close friends. It doesn't mean that I don't like or respect them.
And lastly, I've always indicated that I have a very deep appreciation for what Pete has done here. Yes, he has been great, given us the best period of Seahawk football in franchise history, including our only Lombardi. But what has he done for us lately? IMO not near enough.
Having said all of that, I'll repeat my position on Pete's continuance as our HC. I am not quite there as far as calling for his head. I am not at all pleased with his performance over the past 8 seasons, but this past year, in particular the results of the Russell trade, his management of the 2022 draft, and the success of some aspects of our team this season has caused me to pull back a bit on what I was calling for at the end of last season. But I'm not going to vigorously defend him, either. My personal preference is that he retire and hand the reins over to someone else, but I could live with him for another season.
Aseahawkfan wrote:Hater!![]()
![]()
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests